Abstract
Introduction. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with cisplatin radiosensitization currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. More than 80 % of patients present with a substantial tumor burden at initial diagnosis, underscoring the critical need for induction chemotherapy (ICT) as the first treatment step. However, a major limitation of ICT is the high toxicity of the only approved TPF regimen. Here, we present the results of a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of a de-escalated ICT regimen (docetaxel + cisplatin) in HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
Aim. To evaluate three-year oncologic outcomes of a de-escalated ICT regimen (TP) compared with the standard TPF regimen in the treatment of locally advanced HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
Materials and Methods. Since 2021, 68 patients with locally advanced HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (T3–4N0–1 or T1–4N2–3) have been enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two equal groups: the study group received three cycles of ICT according to the de-escalated TP regimen, and the control group received three cycles of the standard TPF regimen. At the second stage of combined treatment, patients in both groups received standard-volume CRT to a total dose of 70 Gy with carboplatin radiosensitization.
Results. Immediate response rates were comparable between the groups: TP — 73.5 %; TPF — 82.4 % (p = 0.213). A statistically significant reduction in the incidence of mucositis was observed with the two-drug ICT regimen (p = 0.025). Three-year oncologic outcomes also showed no statistically significant differences. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 79.4 % in the TP group versus 67.6 % in the control group (p = 0.809). Three-year overall survival (OS) reached 85.3 % in the study group and 76.5 % in the control group (p = 0.442).
Conclusion. The investigational two-drug ICT regimen demonstrated high objective response rates and three-year OS and PFS outcomes comparable to those of the standard TPF regimen, with numerical superiority in some measures. Notably, the study regimen was associated with better tolerability. These findings support further investigation of the two-drug ICT regimen as a potential alternative to the approved regimen in the treatment of patients with locally advanced HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
References
Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2023 году. Москва: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2024; 262.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/sop-2023-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf. [Ed. by A.D. Kaprin. V.V. Starinskii. A.O. Shakhzadova. Malignant tumors in Russia in 2023 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Medical Research Institute — branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution ‘NMRC of Radiology’ of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2024; 262.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/sop-2023-elektronnaya-versiya.pdf (In Rus)].
Global Cancer Observatory. Oropharynx. International Agency for Research on Cancer. World Health Organization. 2024.-URL: https://gco.iarc.who.int/media/globocan/factsheets/cancers/3-oropharynx-fact-sheet.pdf.
Голубев П.В., Болотина Л.В., Геворков А.Р., Дешкина Т.И. Современный взгляд на возможность деэскалации объема лечения ВПЧ-ассоциированного плоскоклеточного рака ротоглотки. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2021; 10(3): 47‑53.-DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20211003147. [Golubev P.V., Bolotina L.V., Gevorkov A.R., Deshkina T.I. A current view on the possibility of treatment volume de-escalation in HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2021; 10(3): 47‑53.-DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20211003147 (In Rus)].
Геворков А.Р., Бойко А.В., Поляков А.П., et al. ВПЧ-отрицательный рак ротоглотки как отдельная прогностически неблагоприятная нозологическая форма, требующая новых подходов к лечению (клиническое наблюдение). Опухоли головы и шеи. 2019; 9(2): 71-80.-DOI: 10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-2-71-80. [Gevorkov А.R., Boyko А.V., Polyakov А.P., et al. HPV-negative oropharyngeal carcinoma as a separate prognostically unfavorable form of cancer, requiring new approaches to treatment (case report). Opukholi Golovy i Shei = Head and Neck Tumors. 2019; 9(2): 71-80.-DOI: 10.17650/2222-1468-2019-9-2-71-80 (In Rus)].
Kreimer A.R., Clifford G.M., Boyle P., Franceschi S. Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevent: Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prevent Oncol. 2005; 14(2): 467-75.-DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0551.
Anantharaman D., Abedi-Ardekani B., Beachler D.C., et al. Geographic heterogeneity in the prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017; 140(9): 1968-75.-DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30608.
Abogunrin S., Di Tanna G.L., Keeping S., et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in head and neck cancers in European populations: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14(1): 968.-DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-968.
Sastre-Garau X., Harlé A. Pathology of HPV-associated head and neck carcinomas: Recent data and perspectives for the development of specific tumor markers. Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 528957.-DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.528957.
Powell S.F., Vu L., Spanos W.C., Pyeon D. The key differences between human papillomavirus-positive and -negative head and neck cancers: biological and clinical implications. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(20): 5206.-DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205206.
Thompson L.D.R., Burchette R., Iganej S., Bhattasali O. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in 390 patients: Analysis of clinical and histological criteria which significantly impact outcome. Head Neck Pathol. 2020; 14(3): 666-688.-DOI: 10.1007/s12105-019-01096-0.
Rieckmann T., Tribius S., Grob T.J., et al. HNSCC cell lines positive for HPV and p16 possess higher cellular radiosensitivity due to an impaired DSB repair capacity. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 107(2): 242-6.-DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.013.
Lacas B., Bourhis J., Overgaard J., et al. Role of radiotherapy fractionation in head and neck cancers (MARCH): an updated meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(9): 1221-1237.-DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30458-8.
Petrelli F., Nardone M., Trevisan F., et al. Comparison of different treatments for HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 280(3): 963-971.-DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07710-2.
Pignon J.P., le Maître A., Maillard E., et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 92(1): 4-14.-DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014.
Чойнзонов Е.Л., Подвязников С.О., Минкин А.У., et al. Клинические рекомендации. Диагностика и лечении рака ротоглотки. Сибирский онкологический журнал. 2016; 15(1): 83-87.-DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-1-83-87. [Choinzonov E.L., Podvyaznikov S.O., Minkin A.U. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. Clinical recommendations. Siberian Journal of Oncology. 2016; 15(1): 83-87.-DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2016-15-1-83-87 (In Rus)].
Bhattasali O., Han J., Thompson L.D.R., et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation versus concurrent chemoradiation alone in the definitive management of p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with low-neck or N3 disease. Oral Oncol. 2018; 78: 151-155.-DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.031.
Голубев П.В., Болотина Л.В., Геворков А.Р., Дешкина Т.И. Сравнительная оценка токсичности различных режимов индукционной химиотерапии при лечении больных плоскоклеточным раком орофарингеальной области. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2022; 11(5): 31‑37.-DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20221105131. [Golubev P.V., Bolotina L.V., Gevorkov A.R., Deshkina T.I. Comparative assessment of the toxicity of different induction chemotherapy regimens for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2022; 11(5): 31‑37.-DOI: 10.17116/onkolog20221105131 (In Rus)].
Dragan T., Van Gossum A., Duprez F., et al. Patient-reported outcomes in terms of swallowing and quality of life after prophylactic versus reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in advanced oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy: Swall PEG study. Trials. 2022; 23(1): 1036.-DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06991-6.
Ghi M.G., Paccagnella A., Ferrari D., et al. Induction TPF followed by concomitant treatment versus concomitant treatment alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer. A phase II-III trial. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(9): 2206-2212.-DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx299.
Болотина Л.В., Владимирова Л.Ю., Деньгина Н.В., et al. Опухоли головы и шеи. Клинические рекомендации RUSSCO, часть 1.1. Злокачественные опухоли. 2025; 15(3s2): 193–219.-DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2025-15-3s2-1.1-09. [Bolotina L.V., Vladimirova L.U., Dengina N.V. et al. Head and Neck Cancer. RUSSCO Clinical Guidelines, Part 1.1. Malignant Tumours. 2025; 15(3s2): 193-219.-DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2025-15-3s2-1.1-09 (In Rus)].
Adelstein D.J., Ismaila N., Ku J.A., et al. Role of treatment deintensification in the management of p16+ Oropharyngeal Cancer: ASCO Provisional Clinical Opinion. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(18): 1578-1589.-DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00441.
Seiwert T.Y., Foster C.C., Blair E.A., et al. OPTIMA: a phase II dose and volume de-escalation trial for human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(2): 297-302.-DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy522.
Tsai C.J., McBride S.M., Riaz N., et al. Evaluation of substantial reduction in elective radiotherapy dose and field in patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2022; 8(3): 364-372.-DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6416.
Misiukiewicz K., Gupta V., Miles B.A., et al. Standard of care vs reduced-dose chemoradiation after induction chemotherapy in HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma patients: The Quarterback trial. Oral Oncol. 2019; 95: 170-177.-DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.06.021.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2026
