Abstract
Introduction. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for axillary staging in early breast cancer (BC). However, its role in patients with locally advanced disease (cT4N0-1) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) remains debatable.
Aim. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SLNB in patients with stage cT4N0-1M0 (ycN0) BC after NAST.
Materials and Methods. This prospective study included 63 patients with stage cT4N0-1M0 BC who underwent NAST followed by mastectomy with SLNB and completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Sentinel nodes were identified using a radioisotope method (99mTc-Nanotop). The study assessed the sentinel lymph node detection rate, false-negative rate (FNR), sensitivity, and negative predictive value.
Results. The sentinel lymph node detection rate was 95% (60/63). Metastatic involvement was identified in 38.3% of cases (23/60). The FNR was 5.6% (4 cases), sensitivity was 85%, and negative predictive value was 90%. A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 24% of patients, most frequently in the HER2-positive subtype (63%). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the FNR decreased as the number of lymph nodes removed increased. When a single lymph node was removed (7 patients), the FNR was 42% (3 cases). In contrast, when three lymph nodes were removed (29 patients), the FNR was 3% (1 case) (p = 0.012).
Conclusion. Radioisotope-guided SLNB demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in patients with cT4N0-1 BC after NAST. These findings suggest that SLNB can be considered a viable alternative to ALND, provided that at least three sentinel lymph nodes are successfully removed.
References
Lucci A., Linda Mackie McCall, Peter D Beitsch, et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(24): 3657-3663.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062.
Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. Women’s Oncology Review. 2003; 349(6): 546-53.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012782.
Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(12): 983-90.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70947-0.
Piltin M.A., Hoskin T.L., Day C.N., et al. Oncologic outcomes of sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27 (12): 4795-4801.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08900-0.
Старкова М.В., Зикиряходжаев А.Д., Грушина Т.И., et al. Диагностическая значимость биопсии сторожевого лимфатического узла у больных ранним раком молочной железы. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2019; 8(6): 422 427.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20198061422. [Starkova M.V., Zikiryakhodzhaev A.D., Grushina T.I., et al. Diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2019; 8(6): 422 427.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20198061422 (In Rus)].
Charfare H., Limongelli S., Purushotham A.D. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(1): 14-23.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4840.
Nason K.S., Anderson B.O., Byrd D.R., et al. Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy rates after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000; 89(11): 2187-94.
Pecha V., Kolarik D., Kozevnikova R., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer. 2011; 117(20): 4606-16.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26102.
Canavese G., Dozin B., Vecchio C., et al. Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive axillary nodes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37(8): 688-94.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.05.012.
El Hage Chehade H., Headon H., El Tokhy O., et al. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy a viable alternative to complete axillary dissection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis? An updated meta-analysis involving 3,398 patients. Am J Surg. 2016; 212(5): 969-981.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.018.
Tan V.K.M., Goh B.K.P., Fook‐Chong S., et al. The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically node-negative patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2011; 104 (1): 97-103.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21911.
Lyman G.H., Temin S., Edge S.B., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(13): 1365-83.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0947.
Giuliano A.E., Ballman K.V., McCall L., et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 318(10): 918-926.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11470.
von Minckwitz G., Untch M., Blohmer J.U., et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(15): 1796-1804.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595.
Classe J.M., Loaec C., Gimbergues P., et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy without axillary lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is accurate and safe for selected patients: the GANEA 2 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 173(2): 343-352.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5004-7.
Berberoglu K., Erdemir A., Rasa K., et al. Role of gamma probe-assisted intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation in predicting axillary breast cancer metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nucl Med Commun. 2020; 41(2): 120-125.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001111.
Lee S.B., Kim H., Kim J., et al. Prognosis according to clini-cal and pathologic lymph node status in breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone after neo-adjuvant therapy. PLoS ONE. 2021; 16(5): e0251597.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251597.
Jimenez-Gomez M., Loro-Pérez J., Vega-Benítez V., et al. Axillary management in patients with breast cancer and positive axilla at diagnosis. Experience in a Spanish university hospital with a 5-year follow-up. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023; 19(2): 183-190.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_263_22.
Andreis D., Bonardi S., Allevi G., et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2 to T4, N0 and N1 breast cancer. Breast. 2016; 29: 55-61.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.07.003.
Tee S.R., Devane L.A., Evoy D., et al. Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initial biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2018; 105(12): 1541-1552.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10986.
Емельянов А., Криворотько П., Жильцова Е., et al. Хирургическое стадирование аксиллярной области у больных раком молочной железы категории сN+ перешедших в категорию ycN0 после неоадъювантной терапии. Вопросы онкологии. 2022; 68(3): 322-332.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-322-332. [Emelyanov A.S., Krivorotko P.V., Zhiltsova E.K., et al. SemiglazovAxillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients downstaging from cN+ to ycN0. Voprosy Onkologii = Problems in Oncology. 2022; 68(3): 322-332.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-322-332 (In Rus)].
Dominici L.S., Negron Gonzalez V.M., Buzdar A.U., et al. Cyto-logically proven axillary lymph node metastases are eradicated in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab for HER2- positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2010; 116(12): 2884-9.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25152.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2026
