The possibilities of intra-arterial chemioembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

interventional radiology
intra-arterial chemotherapy
neuroendocrine tumors
liver metastases

How to Cite

Solovyova, L., Polikarpov , A., Popov, S., Pavlovsky, A., Kozlov, A., Granov , D., & Maistrenko, D. (2023). The possibilities of intra-arterial chemioembolization in the treatment of patients with unresectable liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors. Voprosy Onkologii, 69(2), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-2-285-291

Abstract

Introduction. The liver is a common site of metastasis for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). The number, size, and distribution of liver metastases are important factors that influence the prognosis and quality of life of patients.

Until recently, surgical resection was the preferred treatment method. However, due to the multifocal and predominantly bilobar nature of liver involvement in NET metastases, many patients with NET metastases are not eligible for surgical intervention.

Aim. To analyze the results of intra-arterial chemioembolization in treating patients with unresectable liver metastases of NET.

Materials and methods. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of treatment outcomes using interventional radiology methods for 142 patients with liver metastases of NET between 2006 and 2021.

Results. After two cycles of regional chemotherapy, a complete response was achieved in 13 % of patients, partial response in 20 %, stabilization in 53 %, and progression in 14 %. Reduction of carcinoid syndrome symptoms was observed in 65 % of patients. In patients with primary unresectable NET liver metastases after regional chemotherapy, radical surgery was possible in 5 % of cases and cytoreductive surgery in 8 % of cases.

Conclusion. The number, size, and location of liver metastases are important factors determining the disease prognosis and the patient's quality of life. Given the multifocal, predominantly bilobar nature of liver involvement, the majority of patients with NET metastases are not suitable for surgery. Interventional radiology methods are an effective alternative treatment that can reduce tumor burden, alleviate symptomatic manifestations of carcinoid syndrome, and prepare the patient for further cytoreductive interventions.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-2-285-291
pdf (Русский)

References

Egger ME, Armstrong E, Martin RC, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization vs radioembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastases: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(4):363370.doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.026.

Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patientswith neuroendocrine tumors in the united states. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(10):13351342.doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589.

Hallet J, Law CH, Cukier M, et al. Exploring the rising incidence of neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based analysis of epidemiology, metastatic presentation, and outcomes. Cancer. 2015;121(4):58997.doi:10.1002/cncr.29099.

Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after "carcinoid": epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):306372.doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377.

Zhang XF, Beal EW, Chakedis J, et al. Early recurrence of neuroendocrine liver metastasis after curative hepatectomy: risk factors, prognosis, and treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21:182130. doi:10.1007/s11605-017-3490-2.

Riihimaki M, Hemminki A, Sundquist K, et al. The epidemiology of metastases in neuroendocrine tumors. Int J Cancer. 2016; 139(12):26792686.doi:10.1002/ijc.30400.

Frilling A, Clift AK. Therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases. Cancer. 2015;121(8):1172–1186. doi:10.1002/cncr.28760.

Интервенционная радиология в онкологии: Национальное руководство. Автор: Долгушин Б.И. Издательство: Видар-М. 2022:783. ISBN 978-5-88429-265-9 [Dolgushin BI. Interventional radiology in oncology: National Guidelines. Vidar-M. 2022:783. ISBN 978-5-88429-265-9. (In Russ.)].

Юткин М.В., Поликарпов А.А., Таразов П.Г., и др. Регионарная химиотерапия у пациентов с метастазами в печени гастроинтестинальных стромальных опухолей (GIST). Лучевая диагностика, лучевая терапия. 2022;5(2):5774 [Yutkin MV, Polikarpov AA, Tarazov PG, et al. Regional chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Radiol Diagn Ther. 2022;5(2):5774 (In Russ.)].

Таразов П.Г., Поликарпов А.А., Гранов Д.А. Артериальная химиоэмболизация в лечении больных метастазами злокачественного карциноида в печень. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2010;3:1924 [Tarazov PG, Polikarpov AA, Granov DA. Arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of patients with liver metastases of malignant carcinoid. Ann Surg Hepatol. 2010;3:1924 (In Russ.)].

Попов С.А., Павловский А.А., Поликарпов А.А., и др. Новые возможности комплексного лечения метастатических и местнораспространенных нейроэндокринных опухолей поджелудочной железы. Вопросы онкологии. 2018;64(4):493498 [Popov SA, Pavlovsky AA, Polikarpov AA, et al. New opportunities for comprehensive treatment of metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Vopr Onkol. 2018;64(4):493498 (In Russ.)].

Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, et al. The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the Jejunum, Ileum, Appendix, and Cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39(6):75366. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ebb2a5.

Kulke MH, Bendell J, Kvols L, et al. Evolving diagnostic and treatment strategies for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Hematol Oncol. 2011;4:29. doi:10.1186/1756-8722-4-29.

Cloyd JM, Wiseman JT, Pawlik TM. Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020; 11(3):590600. doi:10.21037/jgo.2019.11.02.

Touloupas C, Faron M, Hadoux J, et al. Long term efficacy and assessment of tumor response of transarterial chemoembolization in neuroendocrine liver metastases: a 15-year monocentric experience. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(21):5366. doi:10.3390/cancers13215366.

Biolato M, Marrone G, Racco S, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for unresectable HCC: a new life begins? Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14(4):35662.

Carrasco CH, Charnsangavej C, Ajani J, et al. The carcinoid syndrome: palliation by hepatic artery embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(1):14954. doi:10.2214/ajr.147.1.149.

Scoggins CR. TACE or TARE for unresectable neuroendocrine liver metastases: can we finally start to focus on value? Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(4):18761877. doi:10.1245/s10434-021-09598-4.

Tierney JF, Chivukula SV, Wang X, et al. Resection of primary tumor may prolong survival in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery. 2019;165(3):644651. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.006.

Topaloglu S, Ozturk MH. Chemoembolization for neuroendocrine liver metastasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014;61(130):398404. doi:10.5754/hge12223.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023