Modern trends in surgery of gastrointestinal tract tumors
##article.numberofdownloads## 64
##article.numberofviews## 76
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

oncology
new surgical technologies
endoscopic dissection
laparoscopic surgery
robot-assisted surgery
dissection within the embryonic layers

How to Cite

, , , & . (2016). Modern trends in surgery of gastrointestinal tract tumors. Voprosy Onkologii, 62(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2016-62-2-187-195

Abstract

Development of cancer surgery in recent decades occurs on a background of continuing scientific and technical progress. New technologies after the completion of clinical trials maximally quickly are included in the routine practice of specialized medical centers. At present an escalation of indications for extensive advanced and combined operations in locally advanced and even metastatic tumors goes in parallel with the introduction of minimally invasive interventions, search categories of patients, for whom the radicalism of treatment can be achieved without significant surgical aggression. The study of modern trends of this process will allow seeing the promising areas of scientific research, assuming the image of the future of surgery for cancer.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2016-62-2-187-195
##article.numberofdownloads## 64
##article.numberofviews## 76
PDF (Русский)

References

Abe N., Takeuchi H., Ohki A. et al. Long-term outcomes of combination of endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic lymph node dissection without gastrectomy for early gastric cancer patients who have a potential risk of lymph node metastasis // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2011. - Vol. 74.- № 4. - P. 792-797.

Ajani J.A., Bentrem D.J., Besh S. et al. Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines // J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. - 2013. - Vol. 11. - № 5. - P. 531-546.

Arezzo A., Passera R., Saito Y. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions // Surg. Endosc. - 2014. - Vol. 28. - № 2. - P 427-438.

Baik S.H., Ko Y.T., Kang C.M. et al. Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial // Surg. Endosc. - 2008. - Vol. 22. - № 7. - P 1601-1608.

Bianchi P., Ceriani C., Palmisano A. et al. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer // Ann. Ital. Chir. - 2006. - Vol. 77. - № 1. - P. 41-46.

Biere S.S., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Maas K.W. et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial / H.e.M. van Berge, K.W. Maas et al. // Lancet. - 2012. - Vol. 379. - № 9829. - P. 1887-1892.

Boller A.M., Nelson H. Colon and rectal cancer: laparoscopic or open? // Clin. Cancer Res. - 2007. - Vol. 13. - № 22. - P. 6894-6896.

Borschitz T., Heintz A., Junginger T. The influence of histopathologic criteria on the long-term prognosis of locally excised pT1 rectal carcinomas: results of local excision (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and immediate reoperation // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2006. - Vol. 49. - № 10. - P. 1492-1506.

Briez N., Piessen G., Bonnetain F. et al. Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial // BMC Cancer. - 2011. - Vol. 11. - № 310: doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-310.

Buczacki S.J., Davies R.J. Colon resection: is standard technique adequate? // Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. - 2014. - Vol. 23. - № 1. - P. 25-34.

Buess G., Kipfm ller K., Hack D. et al. Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery // Surg. Endosc. - 1988. - Vol. 2. - № 2. - P. 71-75.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer // N. Engl. J. of Med. - 2004. -Vol. 350. - № 20. - P. 2050-2059.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial // Ann. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 246. - № 4. - P. 655-662.

Collinson F.J., Jayne D.G., Pigazzi A. et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer // Int. J. Colorectal Dis. - 2012. - Vol. 27. - № 2. - P 233-241.

Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M., Veldkamp R. et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial // Lancet Oncol. - 2009. - Vol. 10. - № 1. - P. 44-52.

Dantoc M.M., Cox M.R., Eslick G.D. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review // J. Gastrointest. Surg. - 2012. - Vol.16. - № 3. - P 486-494.

Decker G., Coosemans W., De Leyn P. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. - 2009. - Vol.35. - № 1. - P 13-20.

deSouza A.L., Prasad L.M., Ricci J. et al. A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2011. - Vol. 54. - № 3. - P. 275-282.

D’Journo X.B., Thomas P.A. Current management of esophageal cancer // J. Thorac. Dis. - 2014. - Vol. 6. - № 2. - P. 253-264.

Doornebosch P.G., Bronkhorst P.J., Hop W.C. et al. The role of endorectal ultrasound in therapeutic decisionmaking for local vs. transabdominal resection of rectal tumors // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 2008. - Vol. 51. - № 1. - P 38-42.

Fleshman J., Branda M., Sargent D.J. et al. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial // J.A.M.A. - 2015. - Vol. 314. - № 13. - P. 1346-1355.

Ghezzi T.L., Luca F., Valvo M. et al. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2014. - Vol. 40. - № 9. - P 1072-1079.

Gordon A.C., Kojima K., Inokuchi M. et al. Long-term comparison of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer // Surg. Endosc. - 2013. - Vol. 27. - № 2. - P. 462-470.

Guillou P.J., Quirke P., Thorpe H. et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial // Lancet. - 2005. - Vol. 365. - № 9472. - P 1718-1726.

Gullino D., Giordano O., Ghione S. et al. Mesogastrectomy in the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. Experience with 61 cases // Minerva Chir. - 2000. - Vol. 55. - № 10. - P 721-732.

Heald R.J., Moran B.J., Ryall R.D.et al. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997 // Arch. Surg. - 1998. - Vol. 133. - № 8. - P. 894-899.

Hiki N., Yamamoto Y., Fukunaga T. et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection // Surg. Endosc. - 2008. - Vol. 22. - № 7. - P. 1729-1735.

Hohenberger W., Weber K., Matzel K. et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation - technical notes and outcome // Colorectal Dis. - 2009. - Vol. 11. - № 4. - P. 354-364.

Hosono S., Arimoto Y., Ohtani H. et al. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy // World J. Gastroenterol. - 2006. - Vol. 12. - № 47. - P 7676-7683.

Hotta K., Fujii T., Saito Y., Matsuda T. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors // Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. - 2009. - Vol. 24. - № 2. - P. 225-230.

Hotta K., Saito Y., Matsuda T. et al. Local recurrence and surveillance after endoscopic resection of large colorectal tumors // Dig. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 22. - № 1. - P. 63-68.

Hotta K., Shinohara T., Oyama T. et al. Criteria for non-surgical treatment of perforation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection // Digestion. - 2012. - Vol. 85. - № 2. - P. 116-120.

Isomoto H., Shikuwa S., Yamaguchi N. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study // Gut. - 2009. - Vol. 58. - № 3. - P 331-336.

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) // Gastric Cancer. - 2011. - Vol. 14. - № 2. - P. 113-123.

Jayne D.G., Guillou P.J., Thorpe H.et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcino ma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group // J. Clin. Oncol. - 2007. - Vol. 25. - № 21. - P 3061-3068.

Jeong S.Y., Park J.W., Nam B.H. et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial // Lancet Oncol. - 2014. - Vol. 15. - № 7. - P 767-774.

Jones O.M., Lindsey I., Cunningham C. Laparoscopic colorectal // B. M. J. - 2011. - Vol. 343: d8029.

Kiriyama S., Saito Y., Yamamoto S. et al. Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic-as-sisted colorectal surgery for early-stage colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis // Endoscopy. - 2012. - Vol. 44. - № 11. - P 1024-1030.

Kunitake H., Abbas M.A. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal tumors: a review // Perm. J. - 2012. - Vol. 16. - № 2. - P. 45-50.

Lee J., Kim Y.M., Woo Y. et al. Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy // Surg. Endosc. - 2015. -Vol. 29. - № 11. - P 3251-3260.

Li Destri G., Di Carlo I., Scilletta R. et al. Colorectal cancer and lymph nodes: the obsession with the number 12 // World J. Gastroenterol. - 2014. - Vol. 20. - № 8. - P. 1951-1960.

Low D.E. Evolution in surgical management of esophageal cancer // Dig. Dis. - 2013. - Vol. 31. - № 1. - P. 21-29.

Lujan J., Valero G., Biondo S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients // Surg. Endosc. - 2013. - Vol. 27. - № 1. - P. 295-302.

Luketich J.D., Pennathur A., Awais O. et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 // Ann. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 256. - № 1. - P 95-103.

Martel G., Duhaime S., Barkun J.S. et al. The quality of research synthesis in surgery: the case of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer // Syst. Rev. - 2012. - Vol. - № 14: doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-14.

Meyenberger C., Huch B ni R.A., Bertschinger P. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer // Endoscopy. - 1995. - Vol. 27. - № 7. - P. 469-479.

Morino M., Allaix M.E., Caldart M. et al. Risk factors for recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal malignant neoplasm // Surg. Endosc. - 2011. - Vol. 25. - № 11. - P 3683-3690.

Nakajima T., Saito Y., Tanaka S. et al. Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan // Surg. Endosc. - 2013. - Vol. 27. -№ 9. - P. 3262-3270.

Nayeemuddin M., Daley S.C., Ellsworth P. et al. Modifiable factors to decrease the cost of robotic-assisted procedures // AORN J. - 2013. - Vol. 98. - № 4. - P. 343-352.

Nunobe S., Hiki N., Gotoda T. et al. Successful application of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for a lateral-spreading mucosal gastric cancer // Gastric Cancer. - 2012. - Vol. 15. - № 3. - P. 338-342.

Nussbaum D.P., Speicher P.J., Ganapathi A.M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: results from the national cancer data base // J. Gastrointest. Surg. - 2014. - Vol. 19. - № 1. - P. 124-131.

Ohtani H., Tamamori Y., Noguchi K. et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer // J. Surg. Res. - 2011. - Vol. 171. - № 2. - P. 479-485.

Pai A., Melich G., Marecik S.J. et al. Current status of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A bird’s eye view // J. Minim. Access. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 11. - № 1. - P 29-34.

Park J.S., Choi G.S., Lim K.H. et al. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer // Surg. Endosc. - 2011. - Vol. 25. - № 1. - P 240-248.

Puli S.R., Reddy J.B., Bechtold M.L. et al. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review // World J. Gastroenterol. - 2008. - Vol. 14. - № 10. - P 1479-1490.

Saito Y, Uraoka T., Yamaguchi Y. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video) // Gastrointest. Endosc. - 2010. - Vol. 72. - № 6. - P 1217-1225.

Sehgal R., Coffey J.C. Historical development of mesenteric anatomy provides a universally applicable anatomic paradigm for complete/total mesocolic excision // Gastroenterol. Rep. (Oxf.). - 2014. - Vol. 2. - № 4. - P. 245-250.

Shim C.N., Lee S.K. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer: do we have enough data to support this? // World J. Gastroenterol. - 2014. - Vol. 20. - № 14. - P. 3938-3949.

Siani L.M. Total meso-esophagogastrectomy in surgically resectable Siewert type II-III junctional gastric cancer: Safety and long term oncologic outcome // J. Cancer Res. Ther. - 2014. - Vol. 2. - № 9. - P. 153-159.

Smith B.R., Chang K.J., Lee J.G., Nguyen N.T. Staging accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound based on pathologic analysis after minimally invasive esophagectomy // Am. Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 76. - № 11. - P. 1228-1231.

Son T., Hyung W.J., Lee J.H. et al. Minimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion // Surg. Endosc. - 2014. - Vol. 28. - № 3. - P. 866-874.

Son T., Kwon I.G., Hyung W.J. et al. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer treatment: current status and future perspectives // Gut Liver. - 2014. - Vol. 8. - № 3. - P. 229-236.

Sondenaa K., Quirke P., Hohenberger W. et al. The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery: proceedings of a consensus conference // Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. - 2014. - Vol. 29. - № 4. - P 419-428.

Stevenson A.R., Solomon M.J., Lumley J.W. et al. Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaC-aRT Randomized Clinical Trial // J.A.M.A. - 2015. - Vol. 314. - № 13. - P 1356-1363.

Tanaka S., Haruma K., Oka S. et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm // Gastrointest. - 2001. - Vol. 54. - № 1. - P 62-66.

van der Pas M.H., Haglind E., Cuesta M.A. et al. Lapa roscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial // Lancet Oncol. - 2013. - Vol. 14. - № 3. - P. 210-218.

Veldkamp R., Kuhry E., Hop W.C. et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial // Lancet Oncol. - 2005. - Vol. 6. - № 7. - P. 477-484.

Watanabe T., Itabashi M., Shimada Y. et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer // Int. J. Clin. Oncol. - 2012. - Vol. 17. - № 1. - P. 1-29.

Wexner S.D., Cohen S.M. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy // Br. J. Surg. - 1995. - Vol. 82. - № 3. - P 295-298.

Winde G., Nottberg H., Keller R. et al. Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1). Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. anterior resection // Dis. Colon Rectum. - 1996. - Vol. 39. - № 9. - P 969-976.

Wu Y., Wu Y.Y., Li S. et al. TEM and conventional rectal surgery for T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis // Hepatogastroenterology. - 2011. - Vol. 58. - № 106. - P. 364-368.

Xiong B., Ma L., Huang W. et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a metaanalysis of eight studies // J. Gastrointest. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 19. - № 3. - P 516-526.

Yau K.K.K. Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO) // The Hong Kong Medical Diary. - 2009. - Vol. 14. - № 7. - P. 13-16.

Yoshimura F., Inaba K., Kawamura e Y et al. Clinical outcome and clinicopathological characteristics of recurrence after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer // Digestion. - 2011. - Vol. 83. - № 3. - P. 184-190.

Young P.E., Gentry A.B., Acosta R.D. et al. Endoscopicultrasound does not accurately stage early adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus // Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. - 2010. - Vol. 8. - № 12. - P. 1037-1041.

All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...