Role and place of the surgical complex "Da Vinci" in treatment for the right half of colon cancer
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

minimally invasive surgery
the robot “Da Vinci”
colorectal cancer
robot-assisted surgery

How to Cite

, , , , & . (2016). Role and place of the surgical complex "Da Vinci" in treatment for the right half of colon cancer. Voprosy Onkologii, 62(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2016-62-2-253-257

Abstract

Currently there are a large number of publications, in which the data demonstrate advantages of laparoscopy-assisted colectomy against open surgery. These advantages include: fewer complications in the postoperative wounds, reducing the intensity of pain in the postoperative period, a decrease in length of hospital stay, faster recovery of bowel function in the postoperative period as well as the best cosmetic effect. Also it is proved that when performing laparoscopic surgery it is possible to achieve the criteria of oncological radicalism. A number of clinical studies have reported similar rates of a 3-and 5-year survival rate between these two approaches, which makes laparoscopy-assisted colectomy an attractive alternative to traditional open surgery. Despite significant advances in laparoscopic treatment for colon cancer surgeons are still faced limitations inherent to traditional laparoscopic technique. Development and distribution of surgical instruments for a robotic complex in the middle of the 2000s made it possible to overcome limitations through the use of tools with multiple degrees of freedom and stable three-dimensional high-definition images. The use of robotic technologies in laparoscopic surgery has showed their safety and effective alternative to standard laparoscopic surgery.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2016-62-2-253-257
PDF (Русский)

References

Ballantyne G.H., Ewing D., Pigazzi A., Wasielewski A. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection? // Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. - 2006. - Vol. 16. - P 406-410.

Buunen M., Veldkamp R., Hop W.C. et al. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial // Lancet Oncol. - 2009. - Vol. 10. - P. 44-52.

D’Annibale A., Morpurgo E., Fiscon V. et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases // Dis Colon Rectum. - 2004. - Vol. 47. - P 2162-2168.

D’Annibale A., Pernazza G., Morpurgo E. et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease // Ann Surg Oncol. - 2010. - Vol. 17. - P. 2856-2862.

deSouza A.L., Prasad L.M., Park J.J. et al. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? // Dis Colon Rectum. - 2010. - Vol. 53. - P. 1000-1006.

deSouza A.L., Prasad L.M., Ricci J. et al. A comparison of open and robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma // Dis Colon. - Rectum. - 2011. - Vol. 54. - P. 275-282.

Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey // Ann Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 240. - P. 205-213.

Hazey J.W., Melvin W.S. Robot-assisted general surgery // Semin Laparosc Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 11. - P. 107-112.

Jayne D.G., Guillou P.J., Thorpe H. et al. UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.Randomized trial of laparoscopic assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group // J. Clin Oncol. -2007. - Vol. 25. - P. 3061-3068.

Leung K.L., Kwok S.P., Lam S.C. et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial // Lancet. - 2004. - Vol. 363. - P 1187-1192.

Park J. S., Choi G.-S., Park S. Y. et al. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy // British Journal of Surgery. - 2012. - Vol. 99. - Р 1219-1226.

Rawlings A.L., Woodland J.H., Crawford D.L. Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases // Surg Endosc. - 2006. - Vol. 20. - P. 1713-1718.

Rawlings A.L., Woodland J.H., Vegunta R.K., Crawford D.L. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy // Surg Endosc. - 2007. - Vol. 21. - P 1701-1708.

Ruurda J.P., Draaisma W.A., van Hillegersberg R. et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a four-year single-center experience // Dig Surg. - 2005. - Vol. 22. - Р. 313-320.

Spinoglio G., Summa M., Priora F. et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience // Dis Colon Rectum. - 2008. - Vol. 51. - P 1627-1632.

Zimmern A., Prasad L., Desouza A. et al. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases // World J Surg. - 2010. - Vol. 34. - P 1954-1958.

All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...