Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this study was a comparison of the X-ray density in certain organs and anatomical structures and the determination of the radiation exposure during venous-arterial MSCT scanning and classical two-phase CT of organs of the abdominal cavity. It has been established that the technique of venous-arterial MSCT scanning provided a significant reduction of radiation dose during CT of organs of the abdominal cavity and could be used as an alternative to two-phase examination in the process of dynamic monitoring of cancer patients.References
Буровик И.А., Локшина А.А., Кулева С.А. Оптимизация методики мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии при динамическом наблюдении онкологических больных // Медицинская визуализация. - 2015. - № 2. - C. 129-134.
Прокоп М., Галански М. Спиральная и многослойная компьютерная томография. Учебное пособие в 2 т.: Пер. с англ. под ред. А.В. Зубарева, Ш.Ш. Шотемора. М.: МЕДпресс. - 2007. - Т. 2. - 712 с.
Berrington de Gonzalez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P. et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007 // Arch. Intern. Med. - 2009. - Vol. 22. - № 169. - P. 2071-2077.
Bongartz G., Golding S.J., Jurik A.G. et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. - March 2004. - 52 р.
Brink J.A., Amis E.S. Jr. Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection // Radiology. - 2010. - № 257. - P. 601-602.
Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. Washington, DC: National academy Press, 1990. - 436 p.
Dougeni E., Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. A review of patient dose and optimization methods in adult and paediatric CT scanning // Eur. J. Radiol. - 2012. - Vol. 4. - № 81. - P. 665-683.
EC European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. - EUR 16262. Brussels: EUR, 1999. - 107 р.
Hart D., Wall B.F., Hillier M.C., Shrimpton P.C. Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. - Chilton, Didcot: HPA-CRCE-012. - 2010. - 52 p.
Harvey H.B., Pandharipande P.V. The federal government’s oversight of CT safety: regulatory possibilities // Radiology. - 2012. - № 262. - P. 391-398.
Howe G.R., McLaughlin J. Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study // Radiat. Res. - 1996. - Vol. 145. - P. 694-707.
Lee T.Y., Chhem R.K. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT // Eur. J. Radiol. - 2010. - Vol. 1. - № 76. - P. 28-35.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United states. National Council on Radiation Protection report no. 160. - Bethesda, Md: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. - 2009.
National Research Council (US) Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII phase 2. - Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences. - 2006. - 422 р.
Smith-Bindman R., Lipson J., Marcus R. et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer // Arch. Intern. Med. - 2009. - Vol. 22. - № 169. - P. 2078-2086.
Sodickson A., Baeyens P.F., Andriole K.P., et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults // Radiology. - 2009. - Vol. 1. - № 251. - P. 175-184.
All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...