Kasparov, B. S., Kovlen, D. V., Semiglazova, T. U., Kondrateva, K. O., Ponomarenko, G. N., Kluge, V. A., Kudryashova, T. I., Donskikh, R. V., Semiglazov, V. V., Nosov, A. K., & Beliaev, A. M. (2023). Study of the effectiveness of personalized rehabilitation of patients with operable prostate cancer . Voprosy Onkologii, 69(3), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-3-422-428

Abstract

Aims: evaluating the effectiveness of a personalized rehabilitation program in patients with operable prostate cancer, evaluating the event-free survival of patients in this category.

Materials and methods: A combined cohort controlled clinical study was conducted with the inclusion of 140 primary operable patients with prostate cancer (PC) who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups, in one of the groups, rehabilitation activities were carried out according to standard methods, in the other, rehabilitation programs included technologies selected on the basis of the scientometric analysis. A comprehensive analysis of effectiveness was carried out with the definition of indicators and determinants of efficiency, as well as factor analysis and comparative analysis of alternative strategies of choice.

Conclusions: Personalized rehabilitation of patients with prostate cancer, as a system for assessing the patient's anamnestic, anthropometric, clinical, functional, psychophysiological parameters, allows determining the determinants of the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs, predicting and managing their effectiveness.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-3-422-428

##article.numberofdownloads## 139

##article.numberofviews## 195

pdf (Русский)

References

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660.

Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, et al. Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol. 2020;77(1):3852. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005.

Matthew A, Lutzky-Cohen N, Jamnicky L, et al. The Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic: A biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(6):393–402. doi:10.3747/co.25.4111.

Santa Mina D, Guglietti CL, Alibhai SM, et al. The effect of meeting physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors on quality of life following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8(2):1908. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0329-z.

Bock D, Angenete E, Bjartell A, et al. Habits and self-assessed quality of life, negative intrusive thoughts and depressed mood in patients with prostate cancer: a longitudinal study. Scand J Urol. 2017;51(5):353359. doi:10.1080/21681805.2017.1326523.

Angenete E, Angerås U, Börjesson M, et al. Physical activity before radical prostatectomy reduces sick leave after surgery - results from a prospective, non-randomized controlled clinical trial (LAPPRO). BMC Urol. 2016;16(1):50. doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0168-0.

Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. The physical activity guidelines for americans. JAMA. 2018;320(19):20202028. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14854.

Каспаров Б.С., Семиглазова Т.Ю., Ковлен Д.В. и др. Физические методы реабилитации больных раком предстательной железы: наукометрический анализ доказательных исследований. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2020;9(6):1826 [Kasparov BS, Semiglazova TYu, Kovlen DV, et al. Physical rehabilitation methods in patients with prostate cancer: a scientometric analysis of evidence-based studies. Onkologiya Zhurnal imeni PAGertsena. 2020;9(6):1826 (In Russ.)]. doi:10.17116/onkolog2020906118.

Henningsen P. Still modern? Developing the biopsychosocial model for the 21st century. J Psychosom Res. 2015;79(5):3623. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.09.003.

Papadimitriou GN. The “Biopsychosocial Model”: 40 years of application in Psychiatry. Psychiatriki. 2017;28(2):107–10. doi:10.22365/jpsych.2017.282.107.

Karlsson E, Gustafsson J. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core sets from 2001 to 2019 - a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(14):37363748. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1878562.

Семиглазова Т.Ю., Клюге В.А., Каспаров Б.С. и др. Международная модель реабилитации онкологических больных. Медицинский совет. 2018;(10):108–16 [Semiglazova TYu, Klyuge VA, Kasparov BS, et al. International rehabilitation model for oncological patients. Medical Council. 2018;(10):108–16 (In Russ.)]. doi:10.21518/2079-701x-2018-10-108-116.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Study of the effectiveness of personalized rehabilitation of patients with operable prostate cancer

Keywords

How to Cite

Abstract

References

Similar Articles