COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INFORMATIVE VALUE OF UROVYSION AND AURKA FISH TESTS OF URINE SEDIMENT CELLS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BLADDER CANCER
Vol. 70 No. 2 (2024), Articles
Vol. 70 No. 2 (2024)

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INFORMATIVE VALUE OF UROVYSION AND AURKA FISH TESTS OF URINE SEDIMENT CELLS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BLADDER CANCER

Articles
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-4-483-486
Published 15.12.2013
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Russian Research Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
##article.numberofdownloads## 27
##article.numberofviews## 76
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

FISH
UroVysion
AURKA
bladder cancer

How to Cite

, , & . (2013). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF INFORMATIVE VALUE OF UROVYSION AND AURKA FISH TESTS OF URINE SEDIMENT CELLS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BLADDER CANCER. Voprosy Onkologii, 70(2), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-4-483-486
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Abstract

Informative value of two tests based on FISH of exfoliated urothelial cells in urine sediment (AURKA and UroVysion) was compared in the group of patients (31 persons) with the history of bladder cancer. Coincidence in results of both FISH assays was found in 93.5%. These preliminary data offer the possibility of replacing expensive UroVysion kit by a cheaper AURKA FISH probe and it could be used for monitoring of recurrence in bladder cancer patients.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-4-483-486
##article.numberofdownloads## 27
##article.numberofviews## 76
PDF (Русский)

References

Воробцова И.Е., Васильева З.Ж., Школьник М.И. и др. Применение интерфазного FISH метода на клетках осадка мочи для диагностики рака мочевого пузыря и его рецидивов // Онкоурология. — 2011. — № 1. — С. 73-78.

Троянов А.В. Диагностика и прогнозирование рецидива немышечно-инвазивного рака мочевого пузыря при помощи клинических методов и FISH-анализа // Онкоурология. — 2012. — № 3. — С. 43-50.

Bishoff J.R., Anderson L., Zhu Y. et al. A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers // EMBO J. — 1998. — Vol. 17. — P. 3052-3065.

Marumoto T., Zhang D., Saya H. Aurora A. — a guardian of poles // Nat. Rev. Cancer. — 2005. — Vol. 5. — P. 42-50.

Nakamura K., Kasabian N.,G., Adedonizio J.C. et al. Correlation of heterogeneity index score (HIS) of DNA content in bladder cancer recurrence // Urology. — 1987. — Vol. 30. — P. 498-500.

Park H.S., Park W.S., Bondaruk J. et al. Quantitation of Aurora kinase A gene copy number in urine sediments and bladder cancer detection // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. — 2008. — Vol. 100. — P. 1401-1411.

Sen S., Zhou H., Zhang R.D. et al. Amplification/overexpression of a mitotic kinase gene in human bladder cancer // J. Natl. Cancer Inst. — 2002. — Vol.94. — P. 1320-1329.

Sokolova I.A., Halling K.C., Jenkins R.B. et al. The development of a multitarget, multicolor Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization assay for the detection of Urothelial carcinoma in urine // J. Mol. Diagn. — 2000. — Vol. 2. — P. 116-123.

Zhou H., Kuang J., Zhong L. et al. Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation // Nat. Genet. — 1998. — Vol. 20. — P. 189-193.

All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...