Comparative analysis of morphofunctional indicators of peritoneal macrophages in mice of the cancer line A/sn and white outbred mice
##article.numberofdownloads## 27
##article.numberofviews## 50
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

макрофаги
мыши линии A/Sn
белые беспородные мыши
цитоскелет
адгезия
хемотаксис
F-актин
эндоДНКаза

How to Cite

, , , & . (2013). Comparative analysis of morphofunctional indicators of peritoneal macrophages in mice of the cancer line A/sn and white outbred mice. Voprosy Onkologii, 59(6), 771–776. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-6-771-776

Abstract

A study of the functional state of peritoneal macrophages was conducted of white outbred mice (W/o) which were resistant to cancer pathology as well as the mice of the A/sn line prone to development of cancer diseases. It was reveald that due to induction of aceptic inflamention ( induced by starch administration), chemotaxis of macrophages of the oncological line was 2.5-3 times reduced and capacity to adhesion was 1.5-2 times lower than capacity of macrophages of the control group (W/o). The paint on F-actin of cytoskeletone in cells showed that cells of the control group form filopodia as a result of adgesion to the substrate, during intercellular contacts as well as during macrophage incubation with retinoic acid. Macrophages A/sn can form pseudopodia when exposed to retinoic acid. Macrophages of both groups of mice were shown to be producer of endonucleases. The same activity of these enzymes was provided by the number of cells which was 1.5-2 times fewer in mice of the A/sn line.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-6-771-776
##article.numberofdownloads## 27
##article.numberofviews## 50
PDF (Русский)

References

Дударев А.Н., Антипова Е.Н., Коваленко Г.Ф., Усынин И.Ф. ЭндоДНКазная активность перитонеальных макрофагов // Бюллетень СО РАМН — 2007. — №5. — C. 99-101.

Зубова С.Г., Окулов В.Б. Роль молекул адгезии в процессе распознавания чужеродных и трансформированных клеток макрофагами млекопитающих // Успехи соврем. Биол. — 2001. — Т. 121. — С. — 59-66.

Коваленко Г.А. Индукция ДНКазной активности в сыворотке крови как механизм резистентности к инфекциям в организме человека и животного // Вест. РАМН. — 2001. — № 2. — C. 25-28

Пинаев Г.П. Сократительные системы клетки: от мышечного сокращения к регуляции клеточных функций // Цитология — 2009. — Т. 51. — №3. — С. 172180.

Харьковская Н.А., Краснова ТА., Клепиков Н.Н., Онкологическая и генетическая характеристика мышей A/SN// Экспер. Онкол. — 2000. — № 22. — С. 157-159.

Шутова М.С., Александрова А.Ю. Сравнительное исследование распластывания номальных и трансформированных фибробластов. Роль полимеризации микрофиламентов и актин- миозинового сокращения // Цитология — 2010 — Т. 52. — № 1. — С. 41-51.

Щепеткин И. А. Макрофагальные поликарионы // Успехи физиол. наук — 2000. — Т. 31. — С. 14-31.

Barry I. Hudson, Anastasia Z. Kalea Interaction of the RAGE cytoplasmic domain with diaphanous -1is required for ligand-stimulated cellular migration though activation of Rac1 and Cdc42 // J. Biol. Chem. — 2008. — Vol. 283. — P 34457-34468.

Ellenbroek S.I., Collard J.G. Rho GTPases: functions and association with cancer // Clin. Exp. Metastasis — 2007. — Vol. 24. — P. 657-672.

Endo M., Antonyak M.A., Cerione R.A. Cdc42-mTOR signaling pathway controls Hes5 and Pax6 expresssion in retinoic acid-dependent neural differentiation // J. Biol. Chem. — 2009. — Vol. 284. — P. 5107-5118.

Eruslanov E.B., Lyadova I.V., Kondratieva T.K. et al. Neutrophil responses to mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in genetically susceptible and resistant mice // Infect. Immun. — 2005. — Vol. 3 — P 1744-1753.

Eskelinen E.L., Saftig P Autophagy: a lisosomal degradation pathway a central role in health and disease // Bio-chim. Biophys. Acta — 2009. — Vol. 1793. — P. 664-673.

Fazal F.,Minhajuddin M., Bijli K.M. et al. Evidence for actin cytoskeleton-dependent and independent for RelA/ p65 nuclear translocation in endothelial cells // J. Biol. Chem. — 2007. — Vol.282. — P. 3940-3950.

Olins A.L., Herrmann M., Lichter P Retinoic acid differentiation of HL-60 cells promotes cytoskeletal polarization // Exp. Cell Res. — 2000. — Vol. 125 — P. 130-142.

Palucka K., Banchereau I. Cancer immunotherapy via dendritic cells // Nat. Rev. Cancer — 2012. — Vol. 12. — P. 265-277.

Parent C.A. Making all the right moves: chemotaxis in neutrophils and Dictyostelium // Curr. Opin Cell Biol. — 2004. — Vol. 16. — P. 4-13.

Rego E.M., Desantis G.C. Diferentiation syndrome in pro-myelocytic leukemia clinical presentation, pathogenesis and treatment.// Mediterr. J. Hematol. Infect. Dis. — 2011-3 (1): е2011048/doi:10.4084/MJHID.2011.048.

Robin C., Laura M. Phagocytosis and actin cytoskeleton // J. Cell Science — 2001. — Vol. 114. — P. 1061-1077.

Suzanne F.G. van Helden, Eloise C. Anthong, Rob and PeterI. Horijk. Rho GTFase expression in human myeloid cells // PLOS ONE — 2012-7 (8): e42563.doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone 0042563.

Widlak P., Garrard W.T. Ionik and cofactor requirements for the activity of the apoptosis endonuclease DFF40/CAD // Mol. Cell. Biochem. — 2001. — Vol. 218. — P 125-130.

William E. Allen, Daniel Zicha, Anne J. Ridley et. al. A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis // J. Cell Biol. — 1998. — Vol. 141. — P1147-1157.

All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...