DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with implants: texture vs polyurethane
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

breast cancer
prepectoral reconstruction
immediate breast reconstruction

How to Cite

Shatova, I., Przhedeckij, I. ., Przhedetckaya, V. ., Vashchenko, L., Shevchenko, N., & Chernikova, E. . (2022). DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with implants: texture vs polyurethane. Voprosy Onkologii, 68(3), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-348-353

Abstract

retrospective study included 125 patients with breast cancer, who underwent NSM following DTI prepectoral breast reconstruction with textured implants (98 cases) or polyurethane implants (27 cases) as a part of complex/combined treatment. The most acceptable aesthetic results were after DTI prepectoral reconstructions with TI compared with PI because of reducing the risk of implant contouring (11.2% vs. 40.7%), ripple effect (25.5% vs. 44.4%), especially during the body position  changes. However, using of them is associated with a higher rate of surgical complications followed by implant loss (early periprosthetic seroma 3.1% vs 0%, suppuration of the implant capsule 3.1% vs 0%, implant protrusion/extrusion 6.1% vs 0% ) and capsular contracture III-IV degree compared with PI (6.1% vs. 3.7%).

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-3-348-353
pdf (Русский)

References

Кит О.И., Шатова Ю.С., Франциянц Е.М. и др. Путь персонифицированной тактики лечения больных раком молочной железы // Вопросы онкологии. 2017;63(5):719–723 [Kit O.I., Shatova Iu.S., Frantsiiants E.M. et al. The way of personalized tactics of treatment of breast cancer patients // Questions of oncology. 2017;63(5):719–723 (In Russ.)].

Шатова Ю.С., Ващенко Л.Н., Максимова Н.А. и др. Онкопластические резекции с использованием перемещенных перфорантных лоскутов у пациенток с раком молочной железы и малым/средним объемом молочных желез // Казанский медицинский журнал. 2020;101(1):119–123 [Shatova Iu.S., Vashchenko L.N., Maksimova N.A. et al. Oncoplastic resections using displaced perforant flaps in patients with breast cancer and small/medium breast volume // Kazan Medical Journal. 2020;101(1):119–123 (In Russ.)].

Chopra S, Al-Ishaq Z, Vidya R. The Journey of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction through Time // World J Plast Surg. 2021;10(2):3–13.

Marcelli S, Aso J. Preliminary outcomes and comparison of polytech POLYtxt Ⓡ and MESMOsensitive Ⓡ breast implants with focus on late seroma: Single-surgeon, retrospective cohort study on 621 consecutive aesthetic breast surgery cases // J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74(9):2217–2226. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.092

Пржедецкая В.Ю., Златник Е.Ю., Позднякова В.В. и др. Некоторые особенности гуморального иммунитета и цитокинового статуса при алломаммопластических операциях у больных раком молочной железы // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2021(3):142. doi:10.17513/spno.30851 [Przhedetskaia V.Iu., Zlatnik E.Iu., Pozdniakova V.V. et al. Some features of humoral immunity and cytokine status in allomammoplastic operations in breast cancer patients // Modern problems of science and education. 2021(3):142 (In Russ.)].

Ribuffo D. et al. Dual-Plane Retro-pectoral Versus Pre-pectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction: An Italian Multicenter Experience // Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(1):51–60.

De Vita R. et al. Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results // Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(2):e358–e363. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2018.12.015

Loreti A, Siri G, De Carli M et al. Immediate Breast Reconstruction after mastectomy with polyurethane implants versus textured implants: A retrospective study with focus on capsular contracture // Breast. 2020;54:127–132. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.009

Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS, Oliveira PH, Gouveia P. The breast cancer conservative treatment. Cosmetic results — BCCT.core — Software for objective assessment of esthetic outcome in breast cancer conservative treatment: A narrative review //Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;126:154–9. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.11.010

Marques M, Brown SA, Oliveira I. Long-term follow-up of breast capsule contracture rates in cosmetic and reconstructive cases // Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:769–778.

Pool SMW, Wolthuizen R, Moues-Vink CM. Silicone breast prostheses: a cohort study of complaints, complications, and explantations between 2003 and 2015 // J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71:1563–1569.

Duxbury PJ, Harvey JR. Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery // J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2016;69(4):452–460.

Loreti A, Siri G, De Carli M et al. Immediate Breast Reconstruction after mastectomy with polyurethane implants versus textured implants: A retrospective study with focus on capsular contracture // Breast. 2020;54:127–132. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2020.09.009

Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Corrias F et al. A Clinical Study of Late Seroma in Breast Implantation Surgery // Aesth Plast Surg. 2012;36:97–104. doi:10.1007/s00266-011-9755-3

Плаксин С.А. Поздние серомы после протезирования молочных желез // Новости хирургии. 2019;29(4):402–408. doi:10.18484/2305-0047.2019.4.402 [Plaksin S.A. Late seromas after breast prosthetics // News of surgery. 2019;29(4):402–408. doi:10.18484/2305-0047.2019.4.402 (In Russ.)].

Park BY, Lee DH, Lim SY et al. Is late seroma a phenomenon related to textured implants? A report of rare complications and a literature review // Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(1):139–145. doi:10.1007/s00266-013-0232-z)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2022