Abstract
Introduction. Ex juvantibus confirms that anticancer therapies involving highly toxic agents adversely impact reproductive function. Treatments for childhood malignancies carry equally significant gonadotoxic long-term effects. Current fertility preservation techniques for children and adolescents, particularly the widely used cryopreservation of mature oocytes (in girls) and sperm (in boys), remain unfeasible prior to puberty. In males, sperm cryopreservation represents the most common preservation method. For prepubertal boys, testicular tissue cryopreservation serves multiple purposes: assessing short- and long-term testicular biopsy complications; evaluating the effects of gonadotoxic treatments on future reproductive capacity; refining patient selection criteria through ongoing fertility risk stratification based on diagnosis and treatment protocols; and updating patients and families about scientific advances enabling potential future tissue utilization.
Materials and Methods. The clinical study protocol was developed at the N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology (Ministry of Health, Russia) and approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 18, March 21, 2023). This single-center study focuses on fertility preservation in prepubertal and pubertal boys aged under 17 years with cancer diagnoses.
Conclusion. Current fertility preservation methods for prepubertal boys remain experimental without established standards. Our study pursues the objective to establish a biological cryobank, to refine techniques for spermatogonial stem cell isolation, cultivation and cryopreservation to restore spermatogenesis, and to evaluate the safety of testicular incisional biopsy in this population.
References
Meadows A.T., Silber J. Delayed consequences of therapy for childhood cancer. CA. 1985; 35(5): 271–286.
Meadows A.T. Pediatric cancer survivors: Past history and future challenges. Curr Probl Cancer. 2003; 27(3): 112–126.-DOI: 10.1016/s0147-0272(03)00025-4.
Green D.M., Liu W., Kutteh W.H., et al. Cumulative alkylating agent exposure and semen parameters in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 1215–1223.
Skinner R., Mulder R.L., Kremer L.C., et al. Recommendations for gonadotoxicity surveillance in male childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup Consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: e75–e90.
Abofoul-Azab M., AbuMadighem A., Lunenfeld E., et al. Development of postmeiotic cells in vitro from spermatogonial cells of prepubertal cancer patients. Stem Cells Dev. 2018; 27: 1007–1020.
Wilhelmsson M., Vatanen A., Borgstrom B., et al. Adult testicular volume predicts spermatogenetic recovery after allogeneic HSCT in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61: 1094–1100.
Valli-Pulaski H., Peters K.A., Gassei K., et al. Testicular tissue cryopreservation: 8 years of experience from a coordinated network of academic centers. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34: 966–977.
Ho W.L.C., Bourne H., Gook D., et al. A short report on current fertility preservation strategies for boys. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017; 87: 279–285.
Wyns C., Collienne C., Shenfield F., et al. Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 2022–2030.
Fayomi A.P., Peters K., Sukhwani M., et al. Autologous grafting of cryopreserved prepubertal rhesus testis produces sperm and offspring. Science. 2019; 363 (6433): 1314–1319.
Bahadur G., Ling K.L.E., Hart R., et al. Semen quality and cryopreservation in adolescent cancer patients. Human Reproduction. 2002; 17 (12): 3157–3161.
Faes K., Lahoutte T., Hoorens A., et al. In search of an improved injection technique for the clinical application of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 34: 291–297.
Rives N., Courbière B., Almont T., et al. What should be done in terms of fertility preservation for patients with cancer? The French 2021 guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 2022; 173: 146–166.
Braye A., Tournaye H., Goossens E. Setting up a cryopreservation programme for immature testicular tissue: lessons learned after more than 15 years of experience. Clin Med Insights: Reprod Health. 2019.-DOI: 10.1177/1179558119886342.
Mulder R.L., Font-Gonzalez A., Green D.M., et al. PanCareLIFE Consortium. Fertility preservation for male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22: e57–e67.
Duffin K., Neuhaus N., Andersen C.Y., et al. A 20-year overview of fertility preservation in boys: new insights gained through a comprehensive international survey. Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 16(2): hoae010.
Jensen C.F.S., Mamsen L.S., Wang D., et al. Results from the first autologous grafting of adult human testis tissue: a case report. Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(2): 303–309.
Kilcoyne K., Mitchell R. Testicular transplantation for fertility preservation — clinical potential and current challenges. Reproduction. 2019; 158: F1–F14.
Medrano J.V., Vilanova-Perez T., Fornes-Ferrer V., et al. Influence of temperature, serum, and gonadotropin supplementation in short- and long-term organotypic culture of human immature testicular tissue. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 1045, e1043–1057.
Кулева С.А., Карицкий А.П., Лавринович О.Ю., Татищева Ю.А. Предпосылки к созданию программы по сохранению фертильности у детей с онкологическими заболеваниями. Вопросы онкологии. 2024; 6: 1017–1026.-DOI: 10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-6-1017-1026. [Kuleva S.A., Karitskiy A.P., Lavrinovich O.Yu., Tatishcheva Yu.A. Prerequisites for the creation of a program to preserve fertility in children with cancer. Voprosy Onkologii = Problems in Oncology. 2024; 6: 1017-26 (In Rus)].
Panasiuk A., Nussey S., Veys P., et al. Gonadal function and fertility after stem cell transplantation in childhood: comparison of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen containing melphalan with a myeloablative regimen containing busulfan. Br J Haematol. 2015; 170: 719–726.
Poganitsch-Korhonen M., Masliukaite I., Nurmio M., et al. Decreased spermatogonial quantity in prepubertal boys with leukaemia treated with alkylating agents. Leukemia. 2017; 31: 1460–1463.
Кулева С.А., Курочкина Д.Н., Иванова С.В. Факторный анализ преконцептивных переменных у детей и подростков с лимфомой Ходжкина. Евразийский Союз Ученых. 2019; 4 (61): 31–37. [Kuleva S.A., Kurochkina D.N., Ivanova S.V. Factor analysis of preconceptive variables in children and adolescents with Hodgkin's lymphoma. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2019; 4(61): 31-7 (In Rus)].
Колыгин Б.А., Кулева С.А. Диагностика и лечение лимфомы Ходжкина. СПб.: Гиппократ. 2009; 208. [Kolygin B.A., Kuleva S.A. Diagnosis and treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Saint Petersburg: Hippocrates. 2009; 208 (In Rus)].
Kelsey T.W., McConville L., Edgar A.B., et al. Follicle stimulating hormone is an accurate predictor of azoospermia in childhood cancer survivors. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0181377.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2025