The use of SPECT-CT with 99mTc-labeled phosphates in patients with suspected skeletal metastases in planar bone scintigraphy
##article.numberofdownloads## 147
##article.numberofviews## 95
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

ОФЭКТ-КТ
ядерная медицина
онкология
остеосцинтиграфия

How to Cite

, , , , , , & . (2013). The use of SPECT-CT with 99mTc-labeled phosphates in patients with suspected skeletal metastases in planar bone scintigraphy. Voprosy Onkologii, 70(3), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-5-611-619

Abstract

We assessed the diagnostic capabilities of SPECT-CT in patients with unclear and suspicious on the secondary lesion with bone scintigraphy background in planar mode (227 patients (mean age — 57 years) with various primary malignancies). All patients underwent planar scintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled phosphates in the "whole body" mode and then — bizonal single-photon-emission computed tomography combined with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT). In patients with the presence of lesions in the skeleton, suspicious on metastases, there was conducted comparison with the data of SPECT-CT. During planar investigation the suspicion on metastases was detected in 41 patients (18%). The use of SPECT-CT allowed excluding metastases in 29 (71%) and confirmed in 7 (17%) of them. In 5 (12%) cases the nature of the changes remained unclear. Thus, in cancer patients with revealed by planar bone scintigraphy unclear or suspicious for metastatic foci in the skeleton, the use of SPECT-CT allowed in most cases (88%) to clarify the nature of these changes.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2013-59-5-611-619
##article.numberofdownloads## 147
##article.numberofviews## 95
PDF (Русский)

References

Веснин А.Г., Семенов И.И. Атлас лучевой диагностики опухолей опорно-двигательного аппарата. - СПб. — 2002. - C. 129-139.

Лишманов Ю.Б., Чернов В.И. Радионуклидная диагностика для практических врачей. - Томск. — 2004. — С. 280-285.

Abe K., Sasaki M., Kuwabara Y., et al. Comparison of 18FDG-PET with 99mTc-HDMP scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer // Ann. Nucl. Med. -2005. - Vol. 19. -P 573-579. Mar 1991. — Vol. 11. — № 2. — P. 219-232.

Berrettoni В., Carter J.R. Mechanisms of cancer metastasis to bone // J Bone Joint Surg Am. — 1986. — Vol. 68. — P. 308-312.

Bonakdarpour A., Reinus W.R., Khurana J.S. (Eds.) Diagnostic Imaging of Musculoskeletal Diseases. A Systematic Approach. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. — 2010. — P. 302-308.

Citrin D.L., Bessent R.G., Greig W.R. A comparison of the sensitivity and ac-curacy of the 99m Tc-phosphate bone scan and skeletal radiograph in the diagnosis of bone metastases // Clin Radiol. — 1977. — Vol. 28. — P. 107-117.

Claus-Peter A. Knochenkrankheiten // Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart. — New York: — 1983. — S. 216-226.

Dickinson F., Liddicoat A., Dhingsa R., Finlay D. Magnetic resonance imaging versus radionuclide scintigraphy for screening in bone metastases // Clin Radiol. — 2000. — Vol. 55. — P. 653.

Eustace S., Tello R., DeCarvalho V. et al. A comparison of whole-body tur-boSTIR MR imaging and planar 99m Tc-methylene diphosphonate scintigraphy in the examination of patients with suspected skeletal metastases // Am J Roentgenol. — 1997. — Vol. 169. — P. 1655-1661.

Evans A.J., Robertson J.F. Magnetic resonance imaging versus radionuclide scintigraphy for screening in bone metastases // Clin Radiol. — 2000. — Vol. 55. — № 8. — P. 653-654.

Galasko C.S.B. Mechanisms of lytic and blastic metastatic disease of bone // Clin Orthop. — 1982. — Vol. 69. — P. 20-27.

Gold R.I., Seeger L.L., Bassett L.W., Steckel R.J. An integrated approach to the evaluation of metastatic bone disease // Radiol Clin North Am. — 1990. — Vol. 28. — № 2. — P. 471-483.

Greenspan A., Jundt G., Remagen W. Differential Diagnosis in orthopaedic oncology // 2nd ed. — Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. — 2007. — P. 458-478.

Jambhekar N.A., Borges A. Metastases involving bone. In: Fletcher C.D.M., Unni K.K., Mertens F. eds. // World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and Genetics. Tumours of Soft Tissue and bone Lyon: IARS Press. — 2002. — P. 334-335.

Kido D.K., Gould R., Taati F. et al. Comparative sensitivity of CT scans, radiographs, and radionuclide bone scans in detecting metastatic calvarial lesions // Radiology. — 1978. — Vol. 128. — P. 371-375.

McDougall I.R., Kriss J.P. Screening for bone métastasés. Are only scans nec-essary? // JAMA. — 1975. — Vol. 231. — P. 46-50.

Meyers S.P. MRI of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions Thieme Stuttgart — New York, 2008. — P. 1-16.

Roodman G.D. Mechanisms of bone metastasis // N Engl J Med. — 2004. — Vol. 350. — P. 1655-1664.

Soderlund V. Radiological diagnosis of skeletal metastases // Eur Radiol. — 1996. — Vol. 6. — P. 587-595.

Unni K.K. Dahlin's Bone Tumors: General Aspects and Data on 11,087 Cases // 5nd ed. Lippincott — Raven. Philadelphia. — 1996. — P. 143-196.

All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...