Робот-ассистированные и лапароскопические операции при дистальном раке желудка: сравнение периоперационных и отдаленных результатов. Обзор литературы
Загрузок: 0
Просмотров: 2
pdf

Ключевые слова

рак желудка
робот-ассистированная хирургия
лапароскопическая хирургия;
дистальная резекция желудка
периоперационные исходы
выживаемость

Как цитировать

Цян, И., Ветшев, Ф. П., Осминин, С. В., Билялов , И. Р., Панина, Е. В., & Петухова, Н. В. (2026). Робот-ассистированные и лапароскопические операции при дистальном раке желудка: сравнение периоперационных и отдаленных результатов. Обзор литературы. Вопросы онкологии, 72(4), 2600. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2026-72-4-2600

Аннотация

Рак желудка сохраняет лидирующие позиции в структуре онкологической заболеваемости и смертности. Хирургическое лечение остается основным радикальным методом, при этом лапароскопический доступ, обладая доказанными преимуществами, имеет технические ограничения. Робот-ассистированная хирургия рассматривается как способ их преодоления. Целью данного обзора явился сравнительный анализ периоперационных и отдаленных результатов робот-ассистированной (РАДРЖ) и лапароскопической дистальной резекции желудка (ЛДРЖ) на основе современных научных данных. Был проведен систематический поиск публикаций в базах данных PubMed, Embase, Web of Science и Cochrane Library. Согласно данным рандомизированных исследований, РАДРЖ демонстрирует сопоставимые с ЛДРЖ или лучшие непосредственные результаты, включая уменьшение интраоперационной кровопотери и более быстрое послеоперационное восстановление. Вопрос о потенциальном превосходстве робот-ассистированной методики в отношении отдаленной онкологической эффективности (выживаемости) остается открытым и требует дальнейшего изучения в рамках крупных многоцентровых рандомизированных исследований.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2026-72-4-2600
Загрузок: 0
Просмотров: 2
pdf

Библиографические ссылки

Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74(3): 229–263.-DOI: 10.3322/caac.21834.

Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424.-DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.

Kitano S., Iso Y., Moriyama M., et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994; 4(2): 146–148.

Hashizume M., Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2003; 83(6): 1429–1444.-DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00158-0.

Brenkman H.J.F., Haverkamp L., Ruurda J.P., et al. Worldwide practice in gastric cancer surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2016; 22(15): 4041–4048.-DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i15.4041.

Gertsen E.C., Brenkman H.J.F., Haverkamp L., et al. Worldwide Practice in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A 6-Year Update. Dig Surg. 2021; 38(4): 266–274.-DOI: 10.1159/000515768.

Hu Y., Huang C., Sun Y., et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34(12): 1350–1357.-DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215.

Katai H., Mizusawa J., Katayama H., et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2017; 20(4): 699–708.-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9.

Kim W., Kim H.-H., Han S.-U., et al. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016; 263(1): 28–35.-DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.

Lee H.-J., Hyung W.J., Yang H.-K., et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. 2019; 270(6): 983–991.-DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217.

Park S.-H., Shin Y.-R., Hur H., et al. Exploring ideal operative time for best outcomes in gastric cancer surgery: A multi-institutional study based on KLASS-07 database. Chin J Cancer Res. 2023; 35(6): 660–674.-DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2023.06.10.

Ojima T., Nakamura M., Hayata K., et al. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156(10): 1–10.-DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3182.

Pan H.-F., Wang G., Liu J., et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017; 27(6): 428–433.-DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000469.

Lu J., Zheng C.-H., Xu B.-B., et al. Assessment of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2021; 273(5): 858–867.-DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004466.

Leanza S., Coco D. Learning Curve in Robotic D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative Proficiency and Postoperative Outcomes. Maedica (Bucur). 2025; 20(3): 471–478.-DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2025.20.3.471.

Misawa K., Kurokawa Y., Mizusawa J., et al. Negative impact of intraoperative blood loss on long-term outcome after curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: exploratory analysis of the JCOG1001 phase III trial. Gastric Cancer. 2022; 25(2): 459–467.-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01266-6.

Wang G., Jiang Z., Zhao J., et al. Assessing the safety and efficacy of full robotic gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis for gastric cancer: A randomized clinical trial. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113(4): 397–404.-DOI: 10.1002/jso.24146.

Guerrini G.P., Esposito G., Magistri P., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020; 82: 210–228.-DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053.

Yu X., Lei W., Zhu L., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2024; S1015-9584(24)01268–5.-DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.06.051.

Macalindong S.S., Kim K.H., Nam B.-H., et al. Effect of total number of harvested lymph nodes on survival outcomes after curative resection for gastric adenocarcinoma: findings from an eastern high-volume gastric cancer center. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18: 73.-DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3872-6.

Hayashi S., Kanda M., Ito S., et al. Number of retrieved lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after total gastrectomy for patients with stage III gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis of a multi-institution dataset. Gastric Cancer. 2019; 22(4): 853–863.-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-018-0902-2.

Ojima T., Nakamura M., Hayata K., et al. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2021; 156(10): 954–963.-DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3182.

Huang W., Tang G., Sun H. Robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies. Int J Surg. 2025; 111(2): 2240–2256.-DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002185.

Guerra F., Giuliani G., Iacobone M., et al. Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31(11): 4346–4356.-DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5507-z.

The Road to Curative Surgery in Gastric Cancer Treatment: A Different Path in the Elderly? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2012; 215(6): 858–867.-DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.021.

Suda K., Man-i M., Ishida Y., et al. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(3): 673–685.-DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0.

Seo H.S., Shim J.H., Jeon H.M., et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy. J Surg Res. 2015; 194(2): 361–366.-DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.022.

Lu J., Xu B.-B., Zheng H.-L., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1): 4668.-DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49013-6.

Gao G., Liao H., Jiang Q., et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score‑matched analysis of 1164 patients. World J Surg Oncol. 2022; 20(1): 315.-DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02778-w.

Hikage M., Fujiya K., Kamiya S., et al. Robotic Gastrectomy Compared with Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I/II Gastric Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. World J Surg. 2021; 45(5): 1483–1494.-DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05939-8.

hibasaki S., Suda K., Hisamori S., et al. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and future directions. Gastric Cancer. 2023; 26(3): 325–338.-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01389-y.

Jin T., Liu H.-D., Yang K., et al. Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients. Updates Surg. 2022; 74(1): 267–281.-DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01176-3.

Feng Q., Ma H., Qiu J., et al. Comparison of Long-Term and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of PSM and RCT Studies. Front Oncol. 2021; 11: 759509.-DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759509.

Shin H.-J., Son S.-Y., Wang B., et al. Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg. 2021; 274(1): 128–137.-DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003845.

Suda K., Sakai M., Obama K., et al. Three-year outcomes of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(4): 2858–2872.-DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09802-w.

Fu J., Li Y., Liu X., et al. Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and quality of life in the upper third of gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 1057496.-DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1057496.

Choi J.-H., Han S.-U., Yang H.-K., et al. The pattern of postoperative quality of life following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort from Korean multicenter robotic gastrectomy trial. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020; 99(5): 275–284.-DOI: 10.4174/astr.2020.99.5.275.

Cui H., Cao B., Liu G., et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes and quality of life in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and totally robotic distal gastrectomy for clinical stage I-III gastric cancer: study protocol for a multi-institutional randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(5): e043535.-DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043535.

Lu J., Wu D., Huang J.-B., et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective trial-based economic evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(10): 7472–7485.-DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10147-1.

Li Z.-Y., Zhou Y.-B., Li T.-Y., et al. Robotic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Cohort Study of 5402 Patients in China. Ann Surg. 2023; 277(1): e87–e95.-DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005046.

Kong Y., Cao S., Liu X., et al. Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020; 24(3): 531–539.-DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04158-4.

Li Z., Li J., Li B., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10: 705–714.-DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S161007.

Lu J., Zheng H.-L., Li P., et al. A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22(7): 1152–1162.-DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3785-y.

Yu X., Zhu L., Zhang Y., et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023; 13: 1158804.-DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158804.

Komatsu M., Kinoshita T., Akimoto E., et al. Advantages of robotic gastrectomy for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a comparison study of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg Today. 2023; 53(11): 1260–1268.-DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02681-1.

Park J.M., Kim H.I., Han S.U., et al. Who may benefit from robotic gastrectomy?: A subgroup analysis of multicenter prospective comparative study data on robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42(12): 1944–1949.-DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.012.

Guo H., Tian Y., Ding P., et al. Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted remote radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on 5G communication technology (FUTURE-04): a prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Gastric Cancer. 2025;-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01687-7.

Guo C., Zhou J., Hu M., et al. Clinical application and observation of 5G remote robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2025;-DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-12268-1.

Nakamura T., Kobayashi N., Kumazu Y., et al. Precise highlighting of the pancreas by semantic segmentation during robot-assisted gastrectomy: visual assistance with artificial intelligence for surgeons. Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(4): 869–875.-DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01495-5.

Choi S., Kim N.Y., Kim Y.N., et al. Fluorescence-guided Two-port Robotic Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg Open. 2023; 4(3): e318.-DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000318.

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2026