Comparative Analysis of Standard and Split-Dose Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 2
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

bladder cancer
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
cisplatin
split-dose regimen
radical cystectomy
pathological complete response

How to Cite

Berkut, M. V., Semenova, A. I., Novik, A. V., Latiphova, D. K., Teletaeva, G. M., hishaeva, E. A., & Nosov, A. K. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Standard and Split-Dose Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer. Voprosy Onkologii, 71(6), OF–2308. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2308

Abstract

Introduction. Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) reduces mortality from tumor progression by 33% and achieves complete pathological response (pCR) in one-third of patients. However, the comparative efficacy of different cisplatin dosing regimens remains understudied.

Aim. To evaluate pCR rates following NACT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients comparing two cisplatin dosing regimens (40 mg/m² vs 70 mg/m²).

Materials and Methods. We analyzed 60 NACT cases preceding RC at the Department of Oncourology of the N.N. Petrov National Medicine Research Center of Oncology (January 2015-September 2024). Patients were stratified into two groups: Group A (n=39): split-dose cisplatin (40 mg/m² over 2 days) and group B (n=21): standard cisplatin (70 mg/m² single dose). All patients were scheduled for RC upon completion of NACT. The cohort included patients with stage II (36.7%, n=22), stage IIIA (46.7%, n=28), locally advanced stage IIIB (10.0%, n=6), and stage IVB disease (6.7%, n=4) with M1b bone metastases identified during NACT and managed within a multimodal treatment approach. Analysis followed intent-to-treat principles.

Results. The groups were compared by baseline characteristics. Mean treatment duration for both groups: 10.76±4.38 weeks (95% CI 9.63-11.89; p=0.085). Median cycles: 3 (range 1-6); Group B required more cycles (median 4, p=0.032). Comparable cisplatin dose density (Group A: 42 mg/week vs Group B: 35 mg/week, p=0.061). RC performed in 40 patients: pCR rate: 10.0% (n=6); downstaging to <ypT2N0: 25.0% (n=15). No significant differences in pathological staging (pTNM) between groups.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2308
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 2
pdf (Русский)

References

Patel V.G., Oh W.K., Galsky M.D. Treatment of muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer in 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020; 70(5): 404-423.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21631.

Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(3): 666-675.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666.

Lee H.W., Kwon W.A., Nguyen L.N.T., et al. Approaches to clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Possibilities and limitations. Cancers. 2023; 15(4): 1323.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041323.

Witjes J.A., Bruins H.M., Carrión A., et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Summary of the 2023 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2024; 85(1): 17-31.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016.

Карякин О.Б., Попов А.М. Неоадъювантная химиотерапия рака мочевого пузыря: за и против. Онкоурология. 2006; 2(2): 31-34.-URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1181/1066. [Karjakin O.B., Popov A.M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer: pros and cons. Oncourology. 2006; 2(2): 31-34.-URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/1181/1066 (In Rus)].

Gakis G. Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the 2020s: Challenges and perspectives. Eur Urol Focus. 2020; 6(4): 632-638.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.007.

Grossman H.B., Natale R.B., Tangen C.M., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(9): 859-866.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022148.

Sherif A., Holmberg L., Rintala E., et al. Neoadjuvant cisplatinum based combination chemotherapy in patients with invasive bladder cancer: A combined analysis of two nordic studies. Eur Urol. 2004; 45(3): 297-303.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.019.

Трякин А.А., Бесова Н.С., Волков Н.М., et al. Практические рекомендации по общим принципам проведения противоопухолевой лекарственной терапии. Злокачественные опухоли. 2021; 10(3S2-1): 26-39.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2020-10-3s2-01. [Tryakin A.A., Besova N.S., Volkov N.M., et al. Practical recommendations on the general principles of antitumor drug therapy. Malignant Tumors. 2021; 10(3S2-1): 26-39.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2020-10-3s2-01 (In Rus)].

von der Maase H., Hansen S.W., Roberts J.T., et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(17): 3068-3077.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.17.3068.

Dash A., Pettus J.A., Herr H.W., et al. A role for neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective experience. Cancer. 2008; 113(9): 2471-2477.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23848.

Sternberg C.N., de Mulder P.H., Schornagel J.H., et al. Randomized phase III trial of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) chemotherapy and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus classic MVAC in advanced urothelial tract tumors: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol no. 30924. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(10): 2638-2646.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.10.2638.

Osterman C.K., Babu D.S., Geynisman D.M., et al. Efficacy of split schedule versus conventional schedule neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Oncologist. 2019; 24(5): 688-690.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0561.

Brierley J., Gospodarowicz M.K., Wittekind C.H. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 8th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017; 272. Union for International Cancer Control.-URL: https://www.uicc.org/resources/tnm-classification-malignant-tumours-8th-edition.

РОО «Ассоциация онкоурологов России». Клинические рекомендации по лечению рака мочевого пузыря. Российское общество урологов. 2024.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/rak-mochevogo-puzyrya_23.pdf. [NGO Association of oncourologists of Russia. Clinical guidelines for the treatment of bladder cancer. Russian Society of Urologists. 2024.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/rak-mochevogo-puzyrya_23.pdf (In Rus)].

Hanna N., Trinh Q.D., Seisen T., et al. Effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the current real world setting in the USA. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018; 1(1): 83-90.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.001.

Scher H.I., Yagoda A., Herr H.W., et al. Neoadjuvant M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin) effect on the primary bladder lesion. J Urol. 1988; 139(3): 470-474.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42495-5.

Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Eur Urol. 2005; 48(2): 202-205.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006.

Meeks J.J., Bellmunt J., Bochner B.H., et al. A systematic review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2012; 62(3): 523-533. -DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.048.

Harik L., Paner G., Al-Ahmadie H., et al. Protocol for the examination of cystectomy specimens from patients with carcinoma of the urinary bladder. College of American Pathologists; 2023.-URL: https://documents.cap.org/protocols/Bladder_4.2.0.0.REL_CAPCP.pdf.

Ковылина М.В., Прилепская Е.А., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Патоморфологическая диагностика рака предстательной железы, рака мочевого пузыря и рака почки: методические рекомендации № 55. Москва: АБВ-пресс. 2017; 52 .-URL: https://uroweb.ru/sites/default/files/patom.pdf. [Kovylina M.V., Prilepskaya E.A., Pushkar D.Yu. Pathomorphological diagnosis of prostate cancer, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer: Methodological recommendations No. 55. Moscow: ABV-Press. 2017; 52 .-URL: https://uroweb.ru/sites/default/files/patom.pdf (In Rus)].

Лушников Е.Ф., Абросимов А.Ю., Двинских Н.Ю. Патоморфоз опухолей человека. Москва: СИМК. 2021; 224. [Lushnikov E.F., Abrosimov A.Yu., Dvinskikh N.Yu. Tumor pathomorphosis in humans. Moscow: SIMK. 2021; 224 (In Rus)].

Wang H.J., Solanki S., Traboulsi S., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy-related histologic changes in radical cystectomy: assessment accuracy and prediction of response. Hum Pathol. 2016; 53: 35-40.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.011.

Pfister C., Gravis G., Fléchon A., et al. Randomized phase III trial of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, or gemcitabine and cisplatin as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Analysis of the GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER trial secondary endpoints: chemotherapy toxicity and pathological responses. Eur Urol. 2021; 79(2): 214-221.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.024.

Карякин О.Б., Воробьев Н.В., Заборский И.Н., et al. Неоадъювантная химиотерапия и радикальная цистэктомия у больных раком мочевого пузыря. Онкоурология. 2022; 18(3): 92-98.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-92-98. [Karyakin O.B., Vorobyov N.V., Zaborsky I.N., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Oncourology. 2022; 18(3): 92-98.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2022-18-3-92-98 (In Rus)].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2025