Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The study is based on data on 1756 patients with cervical cancer treated as combined (remote + contact) and only the contact exposure with low, medium and high dose rate. For comparative radiobiological evaluation of reactions of irradiated tissues there were used the following radiobiological models: factor time-dose-fractionation, the cumulative radiation effect, linear- quadratic model in the variant of biologically effective dose. Survival of cervical cancer patients undergone combined radiation treatment was determined by the stage of disease. In particular, the survival of patients with Stage IB cervical cancer was significantly higher than in Stages IIB and IIIB., while in Stage IIB was significantly higher than in Stage IIIB. Long-term results of radiation treatment of patients with Stage IB1 (T1b1N0M0) and Stage IIB (T2bN0M0) cervical cancer did not depend on whether the contact radiation exposure was combined or single. The most preferred component of radiotherapy in women suffering from cervical cancer was brachytherapy with high dose rate.References
Бохман Я.В. Руководство по онкогинекологии. - СПб.: Фолиант. - 2002. - 542 с.
Двойрин В.В., Клименков А.А. Методика контролируемых клинических испытаний. - М. Медицина. - 1985. - 144 с.
Киселева В.Н., Марьина Л.А., Чехонадский В.Н. и др. Сравнительная оценка эффективности облучения рака шейки матки на различных брахитерапевтических аппаратах // Вопр. онкол. - 2004. - Т. 50. - С. 55-60.
Кравец О.А., Марьина Л.А., Нечушкин М.И. и др. Результаты лучевой терапии рака шейки матки с использованием иридия-192 для контактного облучения // Опухоли женской репродуктивной системы. - 2009. - № 3-4. - С. 99 - 101.
Крикунова Л.И. Лучевая терапия рака шейки матки // Практ. онкол. - Т. 3. - № 3. - 2002. - С. 194-199.
Крикунова Л.И., Мкртчян Л.С., Шентерева Н.И., Сыченкова Н.И. Рак шейки матки. Руководство для врачей. / Под ред. Цыба А.Ф., Мардынского Ю.С. - М.,ООО «МК». - 2010. - С. 347-382.
Чиссов В.И. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2009 году // Ред. Чиссов В.И., Старинский Г.В., Петрова Г.В. - М. - 2010. -196 с.
Arbyn M., Castellsague X., Sanjose S. et al. Worldwide burden of cervical cancer in 2008 // Ann.Oncol. -2011. - Vol. 22. - P. 2675-2686.
Ferrigno R., Nishimoto I.N., Novaes P.E., et al. Comparison of low and high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Retrospective analysis of two sequential series // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 2005. - Vol. 62. - P. 1108 - 1116.
Fowler J.F. The radiobiology of brachytherapy. Brachytherapy HDR and LDR. Proceeding Brachytherapy Meeting Remote afterloading: Edited by A.A. Martinez, C.G. Orton, R.F. Mould. Published by: Nucletron Corporation. - 1990. - P. 121-137.
Hareyama M., Sakata K., Oouchi A., et al. High dose-rate versus low dose-rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized trial // Cancer. - 2002. - Vol. 94. - P. 117-124.
Hellebust T.P., Mirza M.R. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer // Textbook of gynaecological oncology. (ESGO) Ed. Ayhan A. at al. - Gunes Publishing. - 2012. - P. 857-862.
Joslin C.A.F. High dose-rate brachytherapy for treating cervix cancer / In Joslin C.A.F., Flynn A., Hall E. (eds) Principles and practice of brachytherapy using afterloading systems. - Arnold. - London. - 2001. - P. 354-372.
Kirk J., Grey W., Watson E. Cumulative Radiation Effect. Part 1: Fractionated treatment regimes // Clin. Radiol. - 1971. - Vol. 22. - P. 145-155.
Kucera H., Potter R., Knocke T.H. et al. High dose versus low dose rate brachytherapy in definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer // Wien Klin. Wochenschr. - 2001. - Vol. 113. - P. 58-62.
Lertsanguansinchai P., Lertbutsayanukul C., Shotelersuk K., et al. Phase III randomized trial comparing LDR and HDR brachytherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 2004. - Vol. 59. - P. 1424-1431.
Lorvidhaya V., Tonusin A., Changwiwit W. et al. High-doserate afterloading brachytherapy in carcinoma of the cervix: an experience of 1992 patients. - Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. - 2000. - Vol. 46. - P. 1185-1191.
Orton C.G.,Cohen L. A Unified approach to dose-effect relationships in radiotherapy: I. Modified TDF and linear quadratic equations // Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biology. Physic. - 1988. - Vol. 14. - P. 549-556.
Pötter R., Knocke T.H., Fellner C. et al. Definitive radiotherapy based on HDR brachytherapy with Iridum-192 in cervix cancer - report on the recent Vienna University Hospital experience (1993-1997) compared to the preceding period, referring to ICRU 38 recommendations // Bull. Cancer Radiother. - 2000. - Vol. 4. - P. 159-172.
Perez C.A., Breaux S., Bedwinek J.M. et al. Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Analysis of complications // Cancer. - 1984. - Vol. 54. - P. 235-246.
Perez C.A., Fox S., Lockett M.A., et al. Impact of dose in outcome of irradiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: analysis of two different methods // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 1991. - Vol. 21. - P. 885-898.
Pernot M., Hoffstetter S., Peiffert D. et al. Statistical study of a series of 672 cases of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Results and complications according to age and modalities of treatment // Bull Cancer. - 1995. - Vol. 82. - P. 568-581.
Petereit D.G., Sarkaria J.N., Potter D.M. et al. High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence-the University of Wisconsin experience // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 1999. - Vol. 45. - P. 1267-1274.
Stewart A.J., Viswanathan A.N. Current controversies in high-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer // Cancer (Philad.). - 2006. - Vol. 107. - P. 908-915.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Fifth Edition, UICC, Wiley-Liss, Inc. -1997. - 227 p.
All the Copyright statements for authors are present in the standart Publishing Agreement (Public Offer) to Publish an Article in an Academic Periodical 'Problems in oncology' ...