Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction. To evaluate the efficiency of ileostomy and colostomy as a method of preventing and treating postoperative intra-abdominal complications in patients with colorectal cancer.
Materials and Methods. The treatment outcomes of 224 patients operated for colorectal cancer with localization in the left colon. The surgery was performed in the North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov in the period from 2014 to 2022. From this group we selected patients who had an ileostomy and colostomy (n = 57), protective colostomy (n = 24), protective ileostomy (n = 26), and therapeutic or deviating stoma stoma (n = 7).
Results. The study aimed to assess how the formation of a protective ileostomy or colostomy affects the development of intra-abdominal complications in the postoperative period in surgical treatment of colorectal cancer, and to determine the efficiency of postoperative stoma formation for prevention of peritonitis progression in case of interintestinal anastomosis failure. Postoperative intra-abdominal complications were observed during the formation of both protective colostomy and ileostomy, however, there were no statistically significant data on the dependence of complications on the type of stoma (p > 0.05). There were no unfavorable outcomes. The treatment of postoperative complications was complex. The most effective method of treatment of clinically significant failure of the colonic anastomosis was complete disconnection of the intestine by colostomy or ileostomy. These operations helped to control peritonitis. The dependence of complications development on the timing of stoma closure was also evaluated, showing that in the early postoperative phase (9-13 days) stoma removal leads to an increased incidence of complications associated with colonic anastomosis failure (p < 0.05).
Conclusion. Ileo- and colostomies have equal efficacy in both prevention and treatment of complications associated with colonic anastomosis failure, fully disconnecting the underlying bowel (p > 0.05). The selection of the type of intestinal stoma should be primarily related to the safety of formation in each case. Deviation stoma formation in case of anastomosis failure and associated complications is an effective treatment tool. In early postoperative period (9-13 days) stoma removal leads to an increased incidence of complications associated with colonic anastomosis failure (p < 0.05).
References
Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность). 2022 [Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shaxzadova AO. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). 2022 (in Russ.)].
Глушков Н.И., Беляев А.М., Горшенин Т.Л., и др. Мультидисциплинарный подход в лечении пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста с осложнениями рака ободочной кишки. Успехи геронтологии. 2022;35(2):255-262 [Glushkov NI, Belaev AM, Gorshenin TL, et. al. Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of elderly and senile patients with complications of colon cancer. Advances in Gerontology. 2022;35(2):255-262 (In Russ.)].
Kajmolli A, McGuirk M, Gachabayov M, et al. Evolution of the circular stapler in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2020;37:99-101.
Карачун А.М., Самсонов Д.В., Доманский А.А., и др. Малоинвазивная хирургия рака прямой кишки: проблемы и перспективы. Поволжский онкологический вестник. 2016;5(27):76-82 [Karachun AM, Samsonov DV, Domanskii AA, et. al. Minimally invasive surgery of rectal cancer: problems and prospects. Oncology bulletin of the Volga region. 2016;5(27):76-82 (In Russ.)].
Шелыгин Ю.А, Чернышов С.В., Казиева Л.Ю., и др. Сравнительный анализ открытой и трансанальной тотальной мезоректумэктомии при раке прямой кишки. Колопроктология. 2018;4:67-73 [Sheligin UA, Chernishov SV, Kazieva LU, et al. Comparative analysis of open and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Coloproctology. 2018;4:67-73 (In Russ.)]. doi:10.33878/2073-7556-2018-0-4-67-73.
Севостьянов С.И, Чернышов С.В. Сравнение качества жизни больных, перенесших превентивную трансверзостомию и илеостомию. Колопроктология. 2006;3(17):40-44 [Sevastianov SI, Chernishov SV. Comparison of the quality of life of patients who underwent preventive transversostomy and ileostomy. Coloproctology. 2006;3(17):40-44 (In Russ.)].
Топузов Э.Г., Ерохина Е.А., Шишкина Г.А., и др. Профилактика распространённого перитонита после операций по поводу рака толстой кишки. Колопроктология. 2009;1:27-31 [Topuzov EG, Erokhina EA, Shishkina GA et al. Measures of prevention of diffuse peritonitis after operations for colorectal cancer. Coloproctology. 2009;1:27-31 (In Russ.)].
Kanellos D, Pramateftakis MG, Vrakas G, et al. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14(1):S35-7. doi:10.1007/s10151-010-0620-1.
Degiuli M, Elmore U, De Luca R, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer (RALAR study): A nationwide retrospective study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative Group. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24(3):264-276. doi:10.1111/codi.15997.
Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):704-8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023