Open Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial Studying Preoperative Systemic and Regional Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Platinum-Based Agents in Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

resectable cholangiocarcinoma
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
regional therapy
systemic therapy
radical liver resection
tumor response
pathomorphosis

How to Cite

Polyakov, A., Granov, D., Zagaynov, V., Lyadov , V., Efanov , M., Bazin, I., Polikarpov , A., Lyadova , M., Shumskaia , I., Frantsev , D., Shapoval , S., Tselousova, L., & Podluzhnyi , D. (2023). Open Prospective Phase II Randomized Trial Studying Preoperative Systemic and Regional Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Platinum-Based Agents in Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Voprosy Onkologii, 69(4), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-4-656-664

Abstract

Introduction. In a quarter of patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) relapse occurs within six months after surgery, and the life prognosis for such patients is comparable to that of chemotherapy. The presence of negative prognostic factors, including non-radical resection, adversely affects long-term outcomes. The positive role of adjuvant treatment in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma has been shown in only one prospective phase III study (BILCAP). According to retrospective data, preoperative therapy may improve long-term outcomes.

Aim. To improve the treatment outcomes of patients with resectable ICC through the use of preoperative chemotherapy.

Materials and methods. The presented clinical study protocol was initiated at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of Russia, and approved by the local ethics committee on December 22, 2022. In addition to the aforementioned institution, four other centers participated in the study. The clinical trial is registered on the portal https://db.oncoproct.ru (neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ICC).

It is a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial designed to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable ICC compared to the standard treatment of liver resection without preoperative therapy.

Primary endpoint: R0 resection rate (95 %). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate, pathologic response, long-term outcomes, tolerability of preoperative chemotherapy, frequency and extent of post-resection complications after preoperative chemotherapy, compliance rate.

94 patients with resectable ICC are planned to be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Some patients will receive three cycles of systemic gemcitabine/cisplatin therapy. Others will have the regional drug delivery by intra-arterial chemoinfusion, followed by systemic administration on the eighth day of the cycle. The historical control will be used as the сomparison group. It will consist of patients with resectable ICC identified through examination data who underwent resection without preoperative therapy, achieving an R0 resection rate of 81.3 % in this cohort.

Conclusion. The presented study protocol will determine the safety and feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy in resectable ICC using gemcitabine and platinum-based agents, including intrahepatic infusion.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-4-656-664
pdf (Русский)

References

Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663-673. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30915-X.

Yadav S, Xie H, Bin-Riaz I, et al. Neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matched analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1432-1438. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.023.

Tsilimigras DI, Sahara K, Wu L, et al. Very early recurrence after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: considering alternative treatment approaches. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(9):823-831. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1973.

Rizzo A, Brandi G. Neoadjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma: A comprehensive literature review. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;27:100354. doi:10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100354.

Zhang XF, Beal EW, Bagante F, et al. Early versus late recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after resection with curative intent. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):848-856. doi:10.1002/bjs.10676.

Yoh T, Cauchy F, Le Roy B, et al. Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy for long-term outcomes in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study. Surgery. 2019;166(6):975-982. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.025.

Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273-81. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.

Oh D-Y, Ruth He A, Qin S, et al. Durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(8). doi:10.1056/EVIDoa2200015.

Cho Y, Kim TH, Seong J. Improved oncologic outcome with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193(8):620-629. doi:10.1007/s00066-017-1128-7.

Kato A, Shimizu H, Ohtsuka M, et al. Surgical resection after downsizing chemotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced biliary tract cancer: a retrospective single-center study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(1):318-24. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2312-8.

Shroff RT, Javle MM, Xiao L, et al. Gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(6):824-830. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0270.

Ray CE Jr, Edwards A, Smith MT, et al. Metaanalysis of survival, complications, and imaging response following chemotherapy-based transarterial therapy in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(8):1218-26. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.019.

Holster JJ, El Hassnaoui M, Franssen S, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022;29(9):5528-5538. doi:10.1245/s10434-022-11439-x.

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228-47. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011;149(5):713-24. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001.

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

Патютко Ю.И., Поляков А.Н., Подлужный Д.В., и др. Холангиоцеллюлярный рак: состояние проблемы и пути улучшения хирургического лечения. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2018;(12):30-37 [Patyutko YuI, Polyakov AN, Podluzhnyĭ DV, et аl. Cholangiocellular cancer: the state of the problem and ways to improve the results of surgical treatment. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;(12):30-37 (In Russ.)].

Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, et al. The impact of surgical margin status on long-term outcome after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):4020-8. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4472-9.

Бредер В.В., Ледин Е.В., Чубенко В.А., и др. Место дурвалумаба в терапии рака желчевыводящей системы. Современная онкология. 2022;24(4):407-412 [Breder VV, Ledin EV, Chubenko VA, et al. Place of durvalumab in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: A review. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2023;24(4):407–12 (In Russ).]. doi:10.26442/18151434.2022.4.202006.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023