Abstract
This study presents an analysis of the effectiveness of organ-preserving surgeries using various endoprostheses in patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic bones. Nine patients (male - 3, female - 7) with malignant tumors of the pelvic bones (chondrosarcoma - 7, osteosarcoma - 1, me-tastases - 2) underwent organ-preserving surgeries with endo-prosthetics of the postresection defect. The average age of the patients was 38 years (15-67 years). During the operation two patients were equipped with individual prostheses of Waldemar Link, one patient - a combined prosthesis with an individual pelvic component (from Biomedical) and a modular femoral component. In 7 patients modular structures of Implant-Сast were used. The pelvic component was cementless, femoral -more often (7 cases) on a cement basis. Patients were assessed by oncological, surgical and functional results. Anatomically-functional status was assessed on the MSTS scale. As a conclusion good functional and oncological results can be obtained even with the resection of three segments of the pelvic bones if the ileal bone volume is sufficient for a good fixation of the endoprosthesis. To achieve the most durable fixation of the femoral component of the endoprosthesis it is better to use bone cement.References
Алиев М.Д., Тепляков В.В., Мусаев Э.Р и др. Операции при опухолях опорно-двигательного аппарата, из Атласа онкологических операций / Под редакцией Чиссова В.И. - Москва, Геотар-Медиа, 2008. - С. 584585.
Гафтон Г.И., Гудзь Ю.В. Хирургическое лечение сарком таза. Отечественная школа онкологов // Ежеквартальный тематический журнал «Практическая онкология». - 2010. - Т. 11. - № 1. - С. 25-30.
Мусаев Э.Р. Современные подходы к хирургическому лечению больных опухолями костей таза. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени доктора медицинских наук. - Москва, РОНЦ им. Н.Н.Блохина, 2008. - 42 с.
Enneking W.F., Dunham W.K. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the in nominate bone // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. - 1978. - Vol. 60. - P. 731-46.
Falkinstein Y1, Ahlmann E.R., Menendez L.R. Reconstruction of type II pelvic resection with a new peri-acetabular reconstruction endoprosthesis // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. - 2008. - Vol. 90. - P 371-376.
Gebert C1, Wessling M., Hoffmann C. et al. Hip transposition as a limb salvage procedure following the resection of periacetabular tumors // J. Surg. Oncol. -2011. - Vol. 103. - P. 269-275.
Ji T1, Guo W., Yang R.L. et al. Modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction-experience in 100 patients with mid-term follow-up results // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2013. - Vol. 39. - P. 53-60.
Witte D1, Bernd L., Bruns J. et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2009. - Vol. 35. - P 1318-1325.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2017