THE MODERN ASPECTS OF THE BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER CT1-3N0-3M0
##article.numberofdownloads## 35
##article.numberofviews## 95
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

BREAST CANCER
NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY
BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY
ONCOPLASTIC BREAST SURGERY
RESECTION MARGINS

How to Cite

Volchenko, N., Bosieva, A., Zikiryakhodzhayev, A., & Ermoshchenkova, M. (2020). THE MODERN ASPECTS OF THE BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER CT1-3N0-3M0. Voprosy Onkologii, 66(4), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-4-376-380

Abstract

Introduction. While the “no tumor on ink” approach is generally accepted for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patient with breast cancer, it remains unclear whether it is oncologically safe for BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy therapy (NACT). The aim of the study is to investigate the optimal width of the resection edges in BCS after NALT and the influence on disease-free and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. Materials and methods. Retrospectively, the medical documentation of 76 patients with breast cancer, who were performed BCS after NACT, was studied. The distribution by stage of breast cancer was as follows: I St. -5 patients, II St. - 55, III St. - 16 (excluded IIIB St.). Invasive cancer of non-specific type was diagnosed in 81.6% of cases, in 6.5% - lobular cancer, in 1.3% - combined breast cancer. Radical breast resections in the classic version were performed in 28 cases, and oncoplastic resections in various modifications were performed in 48 Cases. Results. We present the retrospective data of 76 patients with breast cancer who underwent OSA after NALT in the Department of breast and skin cancer OF the Moscow Institute of medical research. P. A. Herzen. The results of our study demonstrated the oncological safety of OSO with respect to new sizes of tumor nodes after NALT followed by remote radiotherapy. The method of “absence of tumor cells” at the edges of resection demonstrated a high percentage of 1, 3, 5-year relapse - free and overall survival, the frequency of relapse was 2.6%. There was no statistically significant difference in 1, 3, 5-year relapse-free and overall survival when the width of the resection edges was more or less than 1 mm. Conclusion. The results of numerous studies have demonstrated that the breast- conserving surgery is the safe method of surgical treatment from an oncological point of view and is an alternative for radical mastectomies for patients with the breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2020-66-4-376-380
##article.numberofdownloads## 35
##article.numberofviews## 95
PDF (Русский)

References

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2018 году (заболеваемость и смертность). 2019:с. 250.

Chen A.M. et al. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The M.D. Anderson cancer center experience // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004. № 12 (22). Р. 2303-2312.

Boughey J.C. et al. Impact of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy on the extent and number of surgical procedures in patients treated in randomized clinical trials for breast cancer //Annals of Surgery. 2006. Т. 244. № 3. Р. 464-469.

Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1507-15.

Morrow M, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. Surgical margins in lumpectomy for breast cancer-bigger is not better. New Engl J Med. 2012;367(1):79-82.

Untch M, Huober J, Jackisch C, et al. Initial treatment of patients with primary breast cancer: evidence, controversies, consensus: spectrum of opinion of German specialists at the 15th International St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2017). Geburt shilf Frauen heilkund. 2017; 77 (6):633-44.

Wang S, Zhang X Yang X, et al. Shrink pattern of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and its correlation with clinical pathological factors. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11(1):166.

Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Longterm outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(1):27-39.

K. Wimmer et al. Impact of Surgical Margins in Breast Cancer After Preoperative Systemic Chemotherapy on Local Recurrence and Survival//Annals of Surgical oncology. 2019; 1-8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08089-x

Choi J. et al. Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery After Neoadjuvant Therapy // Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2018. № 12 (25). Р. 3541-3547.

Volders J.H. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery -Consequences on margin status and excision volumes: A nationwide pathology study // European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016. № 7 (42). Р. 986-993.

Mauri D. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: A meta-analysis // Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2005. № 3 (97). Р. 188-194.

Mieog J.S.D. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer // British Journal of Surgery. 2007. № 10 (94). Р. 1189-1200.

Rouzier R. et al. Primary chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: Incidence and prognostic significance of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2001. № 18 (19). Р. 3828-3835.

Chen A.M. et al. Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The M.D. Anderson cancer center experience // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004. № 12 (22). Р. 2303-2312.

Valachis A. et al. Risk factors for locoregional disease recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in patients with breast Cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An international collaboration and individual patient meta-analysis // Cancer. 2018. № 14 (124). Р. 2923-2930.

Mamounas E.P et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Results from combined analysis of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project B-18 and B-27 // Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2012. № 32 (30). Р 3960-3966.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2020