Clinical Evaluation of the Significance of FGFR2/3 Genomic Alterations in Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

urothelial cancer
bladder cancer
FGFR3
mutation
translocation

How to Cite

Berkut, M., Imyanitov, E. N., Tiurin, V., Mitiushkina , N., Artemyeva, A., & Nosov, A. (2024). Clinical Evaluation of the Significance of FGFR2/3 Genomic Alterations in Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis. Voprosy Onkologii, 70(4), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-4-685-695

Abstract

Introduction. The selection of the optimal pharmacological treatment for urothelial cancer (UC) depends on the clinical and morphological characteristics of the tumor as well as the somatic status of the patient. Predictive biomarkers that can reduce overtreatment of patients and identify cases that will not respond to chemotherapy are currently lacking in medical practice.

Aim. This study aims to retrospectively evaluate recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with UC based on fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations and neo- and/or adjuvant drug therapy.

Materials and Methods. Molecular genetic testing was performed on 24 samples of surgical material obtained after radical cystectomy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). All formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples were subjected to manual microdissection of tumor cells. Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) were extracted from the sections using phenol-chloroform extraction. The presence of mutations in the FGFR3 gene and translocations involving the FGFR2 and FGFR3 genes in the samples tested was determined using a proprietary test system developed based on highly sensitive methods - digital droplet PCR and real-time PCR.

Results. The group of clinically significant mutations/translocations of FGFR genes included 6 cases (25.0 %): mutations in the FGFR3 gene accounted for 4 cases and 2 cases of FGFR3 translocation. The second group included patients without FGFR2/3 mutational burden (n = 18). Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) was given in 50.0 % of cases in the FGFR aberration group and in 72.2 % of cases in the non-mutation group (p = 0.362). Adjuvant therapy (AT) was administered in half of the cases in each patient group (p = 1.0). The recurrence rate of MIBC with NT did not depend on mutation status and did not affect DFS and OS. When evaluating the relationship between DFS and AT using Cox regression, postoperative therapy alone was associated with a 4.687-fold reduction in the risk of MIBC recurrence (HR 0.213, 95 % CI: 0.062-0.734; p = 0.014), independent of clinical and morphological indicators, including FGFR aberration status.

Conclusion. This retrospective analysis of the efficacy of perioperative drug therapy did not show any dependence of aberration rates in the FGFR2/3 genes on clinical and morphological parameters or oncological survival.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-4-685-695
pdf (Русский)

References

Sung H., Ferlay J, Siegel R.L., et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3): 209-249.-DOI:10.3322/caac.21660.– URL: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21660.

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2022 году. Под ред. Каприна А.Д., Старинского В.В., Шахзадовой А.О. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2022; 239.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/sop-2022-el.versiya_compressed.pdf. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. The State of Oncological Care to the Population of Russia in 2022. Ed. by Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. M: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Research Institute - a branch of FSBI «National Medical Research Radiological Centre» of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2022; 239.-URL: https://oncology-association.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/sop-2022-el.versiya_compressed.pdf. (in Rus)].

Witjes J.A., Bruins M.H., Carrión A., et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2023 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2024; 85(1): 17-31.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.016.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283823030737?via%3Dihub.

Stein J.P., Lieskovsky G., Cote R., et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(3): 666-675.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2001.19.3.666.

Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г., Сергеев А.В., et al. Выживаемость больных раком мочевого пузыря после радикальной цистэктомии. Онкоурология. 2016; 12 (1): 29-35.-EDN WALWIB.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-1-29-35.-URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/468?locale=ru_RU. [Komyakov B.K., Guliev B.G., Sergeev A.V., et al. Survival of patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Cancer Urology. 2016; 12 (1): 29-35.-EDN WALWIB.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2016-12-1-29-35.-URL: https://oncourology.abvpress.ru/oncur/article/view/468?locale=ru_RU. (in Rus)].

Перепечай В.А., Васильев О.Н., Спицын И.М., Коган М.И. Анализ достоверности факторов прогноза выживаемости после радикальной цистэктомии. ЭКУ. 2016; 1: 28-35-EDN: ZEHONB.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29899514_24673287.pdf. [Perepechay V.A., Vasiliev O.N., Spitsyn I.M., Kogan M.I. Analysis of the reliability of predictive factors for survival after radical cystectomy. ECU. 2016; 1: 28-35-EDN: ZEHONB.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29899514_24673287.pdf. (in Rus)].

Vale C.L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data: Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration. Eur Urol. 2005; 48: 202-206.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.006.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283805002137?via%3Dihub.

Grossman H.B., Bellmunt, J., Black P.C. Can biomarkers guide the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in T2 bladder cancer? Eur Urol Oncol. 2019; 2(5): 597-602.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.002.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258893111930077X?via%3Dihub.

Kamoun A., de Reyniès A., Allory Y., et al. A consensus molecular classification of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2020; 77(4): 420-433.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.006.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819306955?via%3Dihub.

Chomczynski P., Sacchi N. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat Protoc. 2006; 1(2): 581-585.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.83.-URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nprot.2006.83.

Анускина А.А., Митюшкина Н.В., Тюрин В.И., et al. Анализ клинически значимых изменений в генах FGFR2/3при уротелиальном раке. Вопросы онкологии. 2024; 70(1): 69-75.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-1-69-75-URL: https://voprosyonkologii.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/1-24-analysis/1805. [Anuskina A.A., Mitiushkina N.V., Tiurin V.I., et al. Analysis of clinically significant FGFR3 genomic alterations in urothelial cancer. Voprosy Onkologii = Problems in Oncology. 2024; 70(1): 69-75.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2024-70-1-69-75-URL: https://voprosyonkologii.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/1-24-analysis/1805. (in Rus)].

Hayashi T., Fujita K., Hayashi Y., et al. Mutational landscape and environmental effects in bladder cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(17): 6072.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176072.-URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/17/6072.

Loriot Y., Necchi A., Park S.H., et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(4): 338-348.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1817323.-URL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1817323?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed.

Turner N., Grose R. Fibroblast growth factor signaling: from development to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 10: 116-129.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2780.-URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrc2780.

Helsten T., Schwaederle M., Kurzrock R. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling in hereditary and neoplastic disease: biologic and clinical implications. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015; 34(3): 479-96.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-015-9579-8.-URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4573649.

Dienstmann R., Rodon J., Prat A., et al. Genomic aberrations in the FGFR pathway: opportunities for targeted therapies in solid tumors. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25: 552-563.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt419.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419342589.

Babina I.S., Turner N.C. Advances and challenges in targeting FGFR signalling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017; 17: 318-332.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.8.-URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrc.2017.8.

Katoh M. FGFR inhibitors: effects on cancer cells, tumor microenvironment and whole-body homeostasis (review). Int J Mol Med. 2016; 38:3-15.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2620.-URL: https://www.spandidos-publications.com/ijmm/38/1/3.

Ролевич А.И., Смаль М.П., Красный С.А., Гончарова Р.И. Роль мутационного статуса гена FGFR3 в предсказании прогрессирования рака мочевого пузыря без мышечной инвазии. Онкоурология. 2015; 11 (3): 62-70.-EDN: UZGCPV.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-62-70.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_24915914_15764748.pdf. [Rolevich A.I., Smal M.P., Krasnyi S.A., Goncharova R.I. Role of the FGFR3 gene mutation status in predicting progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Urology. 2015; 11 (3): 62-70.-EDN: UZGCPV.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2015-11-3-62-70.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_24915914_15764748.pdf. (in Rus)].

Олюшина Е.М., Завалишина Л.Э., Алексеенок Е.Ю., et al. Исследование мутационного статуса гена FGFR3 в уротелиальной карциноме мочевого пузыря. Архив патологии. 2023; 85 (2):5–12.-EDN: STXYON.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/patol2023850215.-URL: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/arkhiv-patologii/2023/2/1000419552023021005. [Oliushina E.M., Zavalishina L.E., Alekseenok E.Yu., et al. Investigation of the mutational status of the FGFR3 gene in urothelial bladder carcinoma. Russian Journal of Archive of Pathology. 2023; 85 (2):5–12.-EDN: STXYON.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/patol2023850215.-URL: https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/arkhiv-patologii/2023/2/1000419552023021005. (In Rus)].

Кельн А.А., Зотов П.Б., Купчин А.В., et al. Частота встречаемости аберрации гена FGFR при раке мочевого пузыря. Университетская медицина Урала. 2022; 1 (28): 21-22.-EDN: FIXQGU.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48158795_86088235.pdf. [Kеln A.A., Zotov P.B., Kupchin A.V., et al. Frequency of occurrence of FGFR gene aberration in bladder cancer. University medicine of the Urals. 2022; 1 (28): 21-22.-EDN: FIXQGU.-URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_48158795_86088235.pdf. (In Rus)].

Rosenberg J.E., Hoffman-Censits J., Powles T., et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016; 387: 1909-1920.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00561-4.-URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(16)00561-4/abstract.

Sharma P., Retz M., Siefker-Radtke A., et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18: 312-322.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30065-7.-URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(17)30065-7/abstract.

Siefker-Radtke A.O., Powles T., Moreno V., et al. Erdafitinib (ERDA) vs ERDA plus cetrelimab (ERDA+CET) for patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and fibroblast growth factor receptor alterations (FGFRa): Final results from the phase 2 Norse study. JCO. 2023; 41(16_suppl): 4504-4504.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4504.-URL: https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4504.

Bajorin D.F., Witjes J.A., Gschwend J.E., et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus placebo in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384 (22): 2102-2114.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2034442.-URL: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034442.

Sjödahl G., Abrahamsson J., Holmsten K., et al. Different responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma molecular subtypes. Eur Urol. 2022; 81(5): 523-532.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.10.035.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283821021382?via%3Dihub.

Esteban-Villarrubia J., Torres-Jiménez J., Bueno-Bravo C., et al. Current and future landscape of perioperative treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15 (3): 566.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030566.-URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/15/3/566.

Yang Z., Zhang R., Ge Y., et al. Somatic FGFR3 mutations distinguish a subgroup of muscle-invasive bladder cancers with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. EBioMedicine. 2018; 35: 198-203.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.06.011.-URL: https://www.thelancet.com/article/S2352-3964(18)30218-4/fulltext.

McConkey D.J., Choi W., Shen Y., et al. A prognostic gene expression signature in the molecular classification of chemotherapy-naive urothelial cancer is predictive of clinical outcomes from neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a phase 2 trial of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin with bevacizumab in urothelial cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; 69: 855-862.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.034.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283815007794?via%3Dihub.

Seiler R., Ashab H.A.D., Erho N., et.al. Impact of molecular subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol. 2017; 72: 544-554.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.030.-URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283817302518?via%3Dihub

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2024