Predicting Anaplastic Transformation of Low-Grade Gliomas Using Clinical, Radiological, and Molecular Markers: Intermediate Results of a Prospective Study
##article.numberofdownloads## 36
##article.numberofviews## 66
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

low-grade glioma
malignant transformation
astrocytoma
oligodendroglioma
IDH1/2 mutation
1p/19q codeletion

How to Cite

Matsko, M. V., Ulitin, A. Y., Ramenskiy, V. V., Kalmens, V. Y., Kolosova, M. S., Matsko, E. D., Baksheeva, A. O., Jeus, E. I., Kashko, K. A., & Imyanitov , E. N. (2026). Predicting Anaplastic Transformation of Low-Grade Gliomas Using Clinical, Radiological, and Molecular Markers: Intermediate Results of a Prospective Study. Voprosy Onkologii, 72(2), OF–2562. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2026-72-2-OF-2562

Abstract

Introduction. Despite an initially indolent clinical course, all low-grade gliomas (LGG, grade 2) inevitably undergo malignant transformation (MT) to higher grades (grade 3 or 4) over time.

Aim. To identify factors predictive of malignant transformation in LGG.

Materials and Methods. 116 patients with supratentorial LGG underwent surgery. All cases harbored confirmed IDH1/2 (100 %) mutations, and 69 (59.5%) were tested for 1p/19q codeletion. Disease relapse occurred in 47 patients (40,5 %; 47/116). The review according to WHO 2021 criteria was performed on tis-sue from both the surgeries, supplemented by immunohistochemistry (Ki-67, IDH1(R132H), GFAP, p53) and molecular testing (real-time PCR for IDH1/2 and TP53). 1p/19q status was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and PCR in all relapsed cases (100 %; 47/47).

Results. Among the 47 (40.5 %; 47/116) patients with disease progression, 32 (68%) had IDH-mutant astrocytoma grade 2 and 15 (32%) had IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma (ODG) grade 2. The rate of malignant transformation was 19% higher in astrocytoma than in ODG (65.6%; 21/32 vs. 46.6%; 7/15). Factors significantly associated with earlier relapse and MT were: Karnofsky Performance Status < 70% (p= 0.034), tumor growth rate ≥ 5 mm/year (p= 0.04), maximum tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (p= 0.031), tumor volume ≥ 100 cm³ (p= 0.008), involvement of the subventricular zone (p= 0.041), and presence of TP53 mutation (p= 0.035). Factors associated with longer time to progression and MT (protective effects) were: preoperative epileptic seizures (p= 0.02), circumscribed tumor growth pattern (p= 0.039), extent of resection > 90% (p= 0.018), presence of 1p/19q codeletion (p= 0.014), and adjuvant therapy (RT, CT, or both) after initial surgery (p< 0.05).

Conclusion. Malignant transformation with the onset of relapse in patients with astrocytoma grade 2 is 19 % more common compared to ODG grade 2 (65.6 vs 46.6 %). Factors that had a greater impact on the frequency of MT were identified.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2026-72-2-OF-2562
##article.numberofdownloads## 36
##article.numberofviews## 66
pdf (Русский)

References

Ostrom Q.T., Price M., Neff C., et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2015-2019. Neuro Oncol. 2022; 24(Suppl 5): v1-v95.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac202.

Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P., et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23(8): 1231-1251.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106.

Satar Z., Hotton G., Samandouras G. Systematic review-Time to malignant transformation in low-grade gliomas: Predicting a catastrophic event with clinical, neuroimaging, and molecular markers. Neurooncol Adv. 2021; 3(1): vdab101.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab101.

Lemaitre A.L., Herbet G., Ng S., et al. Cognitive preservation following awake mapping-based neurosurgery for low-grade gliomas: A longitudinal, within-patient design study. Neuro Oncol. 2022; 24(5): 781-793.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab275.

Sanai N., Berger M.S. Surgical oncology for gliomas: the state of the art. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018; 15(2): 112-125.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.171.

Claus E.B., Walsh K.M., Wiencke J.K., et al. Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 38(1): E6.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS12367.

Smits A., Jakola A.S. Clinical presentation, natural history, and prognosis of diffuse low-grade gliomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2019; 30(1): 35-42.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2018.08.002.

Hervey-Jumper S.L., Zhang Y., Phillips J.J., et al. Interactive effects of molecular, therapeutic, and patient factors on outcome of diffuse low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(11): 2029-2042.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02929.

Duffau H., Taillandier L. New concepts in the management of diffuse low-grade glioma: Proposal of a multistage and individualized therapeutic approach. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 17(3): 332-342.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou153.

Duffau H. A Personalized longitudinal strategy in low-grade glioma patients: Predicting oncological and neural interindividual variability and its changes over years to think one step ahead. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10): 1621.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101621.

Lasica A.B., Jaunmuktane Z., Fersht N., et al. Genomic prognosticators and extent of resection in molecularly subtyped world health organization grade II and III gliomas-a single-institution, nine-year data. World Neurosurg. 2021; 151: e217-e233.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.026.

Murphy E.S., Leyrer C.M., Parsons M., et al. Risk factors for malignant transformation of low-grade glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 100(4): 965-971.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.258.

Sanai N., Chang S., Berger M.S. Low-grade gliomas in adults. J Neurosurg. 2011; 115(5): 948-965.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.JNS101238.

Louis D.N., Perry A., Reifenberger G., et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016; 131(6): 803-820.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.

Jiang H., Zhu Q., Wang X., et al. Characterization and clinical implications of different malignant transformation patterns in diffuse low-grade gliomas. Cancer Sci. 2023; 114(9): 3708-3718.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15889.

Cai K., Han D., Deng D., et al. Analysis of prognostic factors of low-grade gliomas in adults using time-dependent competing risk models: A population study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Cancer Control. 2022; 29: 10732748221143388.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748221143388.

Nakasu S., Nakasu Y. Malignant progression of diffuse low-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis on incidence and related factors. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022; 62(4): 177-185.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2021-0313.

Pallud J., Audureau E., Blonski M., et al. Epileptic seizures in diffuse low-grade gliomas in adults. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 2): 449-462.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt345.

Gousias K., Schramm J., Simon M. Extent of resection and survival in supratentorial infiltrative low-grade gliomas: analysis of and adjustment for treatment bias. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014; 156(2): 327-337.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1945-0.

Fukuya Y., Ikuta S., Maruyama T., et al. Tumor recurrence patterns after surgical resection of intracranial low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2019; 144(3): 519-528.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03250-8.

Wen B., Fu F., Hu L., et al. Subventricular zone predicts high velocity of tumor expansion and poor clinical outcome in patients with low grade astrocytoma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018; 168: 12-17.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.036.

Ius T., Isola M., Budai R., et al. Low-grade glioma surgery in eloquent areas: volumetric analysis of extent of resection and its impact on overall survival. A single-institution experience in 190 patients: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012; 117(6): 1039-1052.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.8.JNS12393.

Jansen E., Hamisch C., Ruess D., et al. Observation after surgery for low grade glioma: long-term outcome in the light of the 2016 WHO classification. J Neurooncol. 2019; 145(3): 501-507.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03316-7.

Zeng L., Mei Q., Li H., et al. A survival analysis of surgically treated incidental low-grade glioma patients. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 8522.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88023-y.

Rossi M., Gay L., Ambrogi F., et al. Association of supratotal resection with progression-free survival, malignant transformation, and overall survival in lower-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23(5): 812-826.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaa225.

Ständer M., Peraud A., Leroch B., Kreth F.W. Prognostic impact of TP53 mutation status for adult patients with supratentorial World Health Organization Grade II astrocytoma or oligoastrocytoma: a long-term analysis. Cancer. 2004; 101(5): 1028-1035.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20432.

Tom M.C., Park D.Y.J., Yang K., et al. Malignant transformation of molecularly classified adult low-grade glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 105(5): 1106-1112.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.025.

Vecht C.J., Kerkhof M., Duran-Pena A. Seizure prognosis in brain tumors: new insights and evidence-based management. Oncologist. 2014; 19(7): 751-759.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0060.

Blonski M., Obara T., Brzenczek C., et al. Initial PCV chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy is associated with a prolonged response but late neurotoxicity in 20 diffuse low-grade glioma patients. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 827897.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.827897.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2026