Molecular Features of Endometrial Cancer: Entering the Era of Precision Medicine. Review.
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

endometrial cancer
molecular classification
literature review
POLE
MMRd
p53

How to Cite

Zabolotnaya , M. S., Levitskaya, N. V., Ivanov, S. A., & Kaprin, A. D. (2023). Molecular Features of Endometrial Cancer: Entering the Era of Precision Medicine. Review. Voprosy Onkologii, 69(6), 971–976. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-6-971-976

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the third most common cancer in women in Russia, with a prevalence of 191.6 cases per 100,000 persons in 2021. This disease is extremely rare before the age of 40, it rarely occurs from 40 to 50, and gradually increases with age, peaking at the age of 63. Generally, endometrial cancer is diagnosed on early stages, with an overall 5-year survival rate of over 95 %. However, survival declines significantly with regional or distant metastasis, amounting to 68 % and 17 %, respectively. Historically, endometrial carcinoma has been classified into two main clinicopathologic types: endometrioid adenocarcinomas and non-endometrioid carcinomas such as serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinomas, and carcinosarcomas. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) has expanded our understanding of the molecular landscape of endometrial cancer by presenting four molecular subtypes: tumors with mutations in the POLE gene, microsatellite instable carcinomas, tumors with mutations in the TP53 gene, and carcinomas of the non-specific molecular subtype. The integration of molecular classification into clinical practice has changed patient risk grouping, which, in turn, affected the choice of adjuvant therapy. Patient rehabilitating and ensuring a high quality of life is a complex issue that requires striking a balance between reducing the risk of relapse and preventing side effects associated with unjustifiable escalation of treatment. The review provides the data on endometrial cancer molecular subtypes, surrogate markers, and determination methods. The predictive value of molecular classification has been discussed, along with its potential use in further clinical trial designs.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-6-971-976
pdf (Русский)

References

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2022:239 [Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO. The state of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2021. M.: P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute - branch of the National Medical Research Radiology Center the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2022:239 (In Russ.)].

Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(1):16-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv484.

Goebel EA, Vidal A, Matias-Guiu X, et al. The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future. Virchows Archiv. 2017;472(6):885-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2279-8.

Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1983;15(1):10-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(83)90111-7.

Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Kandoth C, Schultz N, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497(7447):67-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12113.

Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM, et al. Improved risk assessment by integrating molecular and clinicopathological factors in early-stage endometrial cancer-combined analysis of the PORTEC cohorts. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(16):4215-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2878.

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer. 2015;113(2):299-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.190.

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, et al. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(5):802-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30496.

Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(1):12-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230.

Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, et al. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(9):860-877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.009.

Vermij L, Smit V, Nout R, et al. Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial cancer management. Histopathology. 2020;76(1):52-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14015.

McAlpine J, Leon‐Castillo A, Bosse T. The rise of a novel classification system for endometrial carcinoma; integration of molecular subclasses. The Journal of Pathology. 2018;244(5):538-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5034.

McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Leung S, et al. Endometrial carcinomas with POLE exonuclease domain mutations have a favorable prognosis. Сlinical cancer research. 2016;22(12):2865-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2233.

van Gool IC, Eggink FA, Freeman-Mills L, et al. POLE Proofreading Mutations Elicit an Antitumor Immune Response in Endometrial Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(14):3347-3355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0057.

Mitric C, Bernardini MQ. Endometrial cancer: transitioning from histology to genomics. Current Oncology. 2022;29(2):741-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020063.

Umar A, Boland CR, Terdiman JP, et al. Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(4):261-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh034.

Stelloo E, Jansen AML, Osse EM, et al. Practical guidance for mismatch repair-deficiency testing in endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(1):96-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw542.

McConechy MK, Talhouk A, Li-Chang HH, et al. Detection of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiencies by immunohistochemistry can effectively diagnose the microsatellite instability (MSI) phenotype in endometrial carcinomas. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(2):306-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.541.

Cho KR, Cooper K, Croce S, et al. International Society of Gynecological Pathologists (ISGyP) endometrial cancer project: guidelines from the special techniques and ancillary studies group. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019;38(Suppl 1):S114-S122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000496.

Köbel M, Piskorz AM, Lee S, et al. Optimized p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate predictor of TP53 mutation in ovarian carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res. 2016;2(4):247-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.53.

Singh N, Piskorz AM, Bosse T, et al. p53 immunohistochemistry is an accurate surrogate for TP53 mutational analysis in endometrial carcinoma biopsies. J Pathol. 2020;250(3):336-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5375.

deSouza NM, Choudhury A, Greaves M, et al. Imaging hypoxia in endometrial cancer: How and why should it be done? Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1020907

Talhouk A, Hoang LN, McConechy MK, et al. Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143(1):46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.090.

de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2018;19(3):295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30079-2.

León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, et al. Molecular classification of the PORTEC-3 trial for high-risk endometrial cancer: impact on prognosis and benefit from adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(29):3388-3397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.00549.

Jamieson A, Bosse T, McAlpine JN. The emerging role of molecular pathology in directing the systemic treatment of endometrial cancer. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology. 2021;13:175883592110359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17588359211035959.

Reijnen C, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Prinsen CF, et al. Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2019;154(1):124-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.097.

N.C.I. Drugs Approved for Endometrial Cancer [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/ drugs/endometrial [Cited 21.05.2023].

Slomovitz BM, Jiang Y, Yates MS, et al. Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(8):930-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.3401.

Mitric C, Bernardini MQ. Endometrial cancer: transitioning from histology to genomics. Current Oncology. 2022;29(2):741-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020063.

van den Heerik ASVM, Horeweg N, Nout RA, et al. PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020;30(12):2002-2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-001929.

RAINBO Research Consortium. Refining adjuvant treatment in endometrial cancer based on molecular features: the RAINBO clinical trial program. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022;33(1):109-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2022-004039.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023