SEARCHING FOR MISSING HERITABILITY FOR BREAST CANCER BY WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING: EVALUATION OF VARIANT PATHOGENICITY AND SELECTION OF CANDIDATE MUTATIONS
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

BREAST CANCER
WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING
CANDIDATE MUTATIONS
BRCA1 P.GLN356ARG MUTATION

How to Cite

Kuligina, Y., Sokolenko, A., Bizin, I., Ivantsov, A., Imyanitov, Y., Romanko, A., & Anisimova, M. (2018). SEARCHING FOR MISSING HERITABILITY FOR BREAST CANCER BY WHOLE EXOME SEQUENCING: EVALUATION OF VARIANT PATHOGENICITY AND SELECTION OF CANDIDATE MUTATIONS. Voprosy Onkologii, 64(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-3-310-318

Abstract

Approximately 10 % of breast cancer (BC) incidence is attributed to inherited germ-line mutations in tumor suppressor genes, and about a half of all hereditary BC cases remain unexplained by known genetic determinants. Whole exome sequencing (WES) offers great promise for the identification of novel hereditary cancer genes, however the interpretation of disease-causing significance for newly identified variants presents a challenge. Here we present the results of WES analysis of 32 hereditary BC patients with unknown causative mutations. In total, 52070 germ-line genetic variants were identified. We designed a special selection algorithm, which uses a sequence of filtering steps for highlighting probably pathogenic mutations. The pipeline is capable to compute minor allele frequencies (MAF) based on public databases; to estimate the potential pathogenicity of mutation according to CADD-database; to summarize the data regarding the gene functions, its pattern of expression and protein interactions networks. As a result we assembled the list of 245 potentially deleterious germ-line mutations probably associated with increased risk of BC. Some of these variants were validated in a case-control study. For example, homozygous missense substitution BRCA1 p.Gln356Arg was detected in 0.9 % of consecutive BC cases; it was associated with 7-fold increased BC risk (95 % CI: 0.83 - 54.83). This finding supports the existence of recessive inheritance of breast cancer predisposition.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-3-310-318
PDF (Русский)

References

1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A., Brooks L.D. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation//Nature. -2015. -Vol. 526. -P. 68-74.

Adzhubei I.A., Schmidt S., Peshkin L. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations//Nat. Methods. -2010. -Vol. 7. -P. 248-249.

Amendola L.M., Jarvik G.P, Leo M.C. et al. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium//Am J. Hum Genet. -2016. -Vol. 98. -P 1067-1076.

Bogdanova N., Enssen-Dubrowinskaja N., Feshchenko s. et al. Association of two mutations in the CHEK2 gene with breast cancer//Int. J. Cancer. -2005. -Vol. 116. -P. 263-266.

Baynes C., Healey C.S., Pooley K.A. et al. Common variants in the ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2 and TP53 cancer susceptibility genes are unlikely to increase breast cancer risk//Breast Cancer Res. -2007. -Vol. 9. -P. R27.

Buslov K.G., Iyevleva A.G., Chekmariova E.V. et al. NBs1 657del5 mutation may contribute only to a limited fraction of breast cancer cases in Russia//Int. J. Cancer. -2005. -Vol. 114. -P. 585-589.

Couch F.J., shimelis H., Hu C. et al. Associations Between Cancer Predisposition Testing Panel Genes and Breast Cancer//JAMA oncol. -2017. -Vol. 3. -P. 1190-1196.

Desmet F.O., Hamroun D., Lalande M. et al. Human splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals//Nucleic. Acids Res. -2009. -Vol. 37. -P e67.

Cybulski C., Carrot-Zhang J., Kluzniak W. et al. Germline RECQL mutations are associated with breast cancer susceptibility//Nat. Genet. -2015. -Vol. 47. -P 643-646.

Easton D.F., Pharoah P.D., Antoniou A.C. et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk//N. Engl. J. Med. -2015. -Vol. 372. -P 2243-2257.

Gorodnova T.V., Kuligina E.sh., Yanus G.A. et al. Distribution of FGFR2, TNRC9, MAP3K1, LsP1, and 8q24 alleles in genetically enriched breast cancer patients versus elderly tumor-free women//Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. -2010. -Vol. 199. -P 69-72.

Gracia-Aznarez F.J., Fernandez V., Pita G. et al. Whole exome sequencing suggests much of non-BRCA1/BRCA2 familial breast cancer is due to moderate and low penetrance susceptibility alleles//PLos one. -2013. -Vol. 8. -P. e55681.

Fachal L., Dunning A.M. From candidate gene studies to GWAs and post-GWAs analyses in breast cancer//Curr. opin. Genet Dev. -2015. -Vol. 30. -P. 32-41.

Ferlaino M., Rogers M.F., shihab H.A. et al. An integrative approach to predicting the functional effects of small in-dels in non-coding regions of the human genome//BMC Bioinformatics. -2017. -Vol. 18. -P 442.

Hilbers F.S., Wijnen J.T., Hoogerbrugge N. et al. Rare variants in XRCC2 as breast cancer susceptibility alleles//J. Med. Genet. -2012. -Vol. 49. -P. 618-620.

Hoang LN, Gilks BC. Hereditary Breast and ovarian Cancer syndrome: Moving Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2//Adv. Anat. Pathol. -2017. -sep 13.

Johnson N., Fletcher o., Palles C. et al. Counting potentially functional variants in BRCA1, BRCA2 and ATM predicts breast cancer susceptibility//Hum Mol. Genet. -2007. -Vol. 16. -P. 1051-1057.

Karczewski KJ, Weisburd B, Thomas B, et al. The ExAC browser: displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes//Nucleic. Acids Res. -2017. -Vol. 45. -P. D840-D845.

Kiiski J.I., Tervasmäki A., Pelttari L.M. et al. FANCM mutation c.5791C>T is a risk factor for triple-negative breast cancer in the Finnish population//Breast Cancer Res Treat. -2017. -Vol. 166. -P 217-226.

Kircher M., Witten D.M., Jain P. et al. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants//Nat. Genet. -2014. -Vol. 46. -P. 310-315.

Kuligina E., Reiner A., Imyanitov E.N., Begg C. Evaluating cancer epidemiologic risk factors using multiple primary malignancies//Epidemiology. -2010. -Vol. 21. -P. 366-372.

Kuligina E.Sh., Sokolenko A.P, Mitiushkina N.V. et al. Value of bilateral breast cancer for identification of rare recessive at-risk alleles: evidence for the role of homozygous GEN1 c.2515_2519delAAGTT mutation//Fam Cancer. -2013. -Vol. 12. -P 129-132.

Li M.M., Datto M., Duncavage E.J. et al. standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American society of Clinical oncology, and College of American Pathologists//J. Mol. Diagn. -2017. -Vol. 19. -P. 4-23.

Liang X., Huuskonen J., Hajivandi M. et al. Identification and quantification of proteins differentially secreted by a pair of normal and malignant breast-cancer cell lines//Proteomics. -2009. -Vol. 9. -P. 182-193.

Mantere T., Winqvist R., Kauppila S., Grip M. et al. Targeted Next-Generation sequencing Identifies a Recurrent Mutation in MCPH1 Associating with Hereditary Breast Cancer susceptibility//PLos Genet. -2016. -Vol. 12. -P e1005816.

Masica D.L., Karchin R. Towards Increasing the Clinical Relevance of In silico Methods to Predict Pathogenic Missense Variants//PLos Comput Biol. -2016. -Vol. 12. -P e1004725.

Mather C.A., Mooney S.D., salipante s.J. et al. CADD score has limited clinical validity for the identification of pathogenic variants in noncoding regions in a hereditary cancer panel//Genet. Med. -2016. -Vol. 18. -P. 1269-1275.

Mavaddat N., Antoniou A.C., Easton D.F., Garcia-Closas M. Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer//Mol. oncol. -2010. -Vol. 4. -P. 174-191.

Melloni GEM, Mazzarella L., Bernard L. et al. A knowledge-based framework for the discovery of cancer-predisposing variants using large-scale sequencing breast cancer data//Breast Cancer Res. -2017. -Vol. 19. -P 63.

Michailidou K., Hall P., Gonzalez-Neira A. et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk//Nat. Genet. -2013. -Vol. 45. -P 353-361.

Mularoni L., Sabarinathan R., Deu-Pons J. et al. on-codriveFML: a general framework to identify coding and non-coding regions with cancer driver mutations//Genome Biol. -2016. -Vol. 17. -P 128.

NCCN Guidelines genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian (2016) V.2.

Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function//Nucleic. Acids Res. -2003. -Vol. 31. -P 3812-3814.

Noskowicz M., Bogdanova N., Bermisheva M. et al. Prevalence of PALB2 mutation c.509_510delGA in unselected breast cancer patients from Central and Eastern Europe//Fam Cancer. -2014. -Vol. 13. -P. 137-142

Pagano M., Gauvreau K. (2000) Principles of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole

Pelttari L.M., Kiiski J.I., Ranta S. et al. RAD51, XRCC3, and XRCC2 mutation screening in Finnish breast cancer families//Springerplus. -2015. -Vol. 4. -P. 92

Pertea M., Lin X., Salzberg S.L. GeneSplicer: a new computational method for splice site prediction//Nucleic. Acids Res. -2001. -Vol. 29. -P. 1185e1190.

Rahman N., Seal S., Thompson D. et al. PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene//Nat. Genet. -2007. -Vol. 39. -P. 165-167.

Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology//Genet. Med. -2015. -Vol. 17. -P. 405-424.

Ripperger T., Gadzicki D., Meindl A., Schlegelberger B. Breast cancer susceptibility: current knowledge and implications for genetic counseling//Eur. J. Hum Genet. -2009. -Vol. 17. -P. 722-731.

Rogers M.F., Shihab H.A., Gaunt T.R., Campbell C. CS-cape: a tool for predicting oncogenic single-point mutations in the cancer genome//Sci. Rep. -2017. -Vol. 7. -P. 11597.

Sadowski C.E., Kohlstedt D., Meisel C. et al. BRCA1/2 missense mutations and the value of in-silico analyses//Eur. J. Med. Genet -2017. -Vol. 60. -P. 572-577.

Satagopan J.M., Offit K., Foulkes W. et al. The lifetime risks of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations//Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. -2001. -Vol. 10. -P. 467-473.

Schwarz J.M., Rödelsperger C., Schuelke M., Seelow D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations//Nat. Methods. -2010. -Vol. 7. -P. 575-576.

Slavin T.P., Maxwell K.N., Lilyquist J. et al. The contribution of pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes to familial breast cancer risk//NPJ Breast Cancer. -2017. -Vol. 3. -P. 22.

Sokolenko A.P., lyevleva A.G., Preobrazhenskaya E.V. et al. High prevalence and breast cancer predisposing role of the BLM c.1642 C>T (Q548X) mutation in Russia//Int. J. Cancer. -2012. -Vol. 130. -P. 2867-2873.

Sokolenko A.P., Mitiushkina N.V., Buslov K.G. et al. High frequency of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in Russian breast cancer patients//Eur. J. Cancer. -2006. -Vol. 42. -P. 1380-1384.

Teng H., Zhang W.Y., Zhu F.Q. A study on the serum pregnancy zone protein levels in pregnant women and patients with gynecological tumors//Chin Med J. (Engl). -1994. -Vol. 107. -P. 910-914.

Tennessen J.A., Bigham A.W., O'Connor T.D. et al. Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes//Science. -2012. -Vol. 337. -P. 64-69.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2018