Ключевые слова
Как цитировать
Аннотация
Хирургический этап остается основным в комбинированном и комплексном лечении рака молочной железы (РМЖ), а радикальная мастэктомия является по-прежнему основным вариантом хирургического лечения в большинстве клиник России. Отсутствие молочной железы (МЖ) является как физической, так и психологической травмой для женщины и приводит к глубокой деформации личности, значительно ухудшая качество жизни. Таким образом, реконструктивно-пластическая хирургия МЖ стала неотъемлемой частью современной клинической онкологии. Лучевая терапия может привести к развитию осложнений после реконструкции МЖ, и наоборот, реконструированная МЖ может вызвать технические сложности для радиолога для правильного подведения необходимой дозы облучения. Таким образом, перед хирургом и радиологом возникла задача выбора оптимальной последовательности реконструкции и снижения риска развития осложнений в послеоперационном периоде после проведения лучевой терапии на эндопротез без ущерба для онкологических или косметических результатов реконструированной железы.
Библиографические ссылки
Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В. Заболеваемость и смертность в 2016 году. - Москва, 2017г.
Захарков Л.И. Подкожные радикальные мастэктомии с первичной реконструкцией при лечении больных раком молочной железы: диссертация.. кандидата медицинских наук 2006г.
Gieni M., Avram R., Dickson L. et al. Local Breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate Breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a metaanalysis // Breast. - 2012. - Vol. 21. - P. 230-236.
Park S.H., Han W., Yoo T.K. et al. Oncologic Safety of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: A Matched Case Control Study // J. Breast Cancer. - 2016. - Vol. 19 (1). - P. 68-75.
Meretoja T.J., von Smitten K.A., Leidenius M.H. et al. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15 year series // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2007. - Vol.33. - P. 1142-1145.
Truong P.T., Woodward W.A., Bucholz T.A. Optimizing lo-coregional control and survival for women with breast cancer: a review of current developments in postmastectomy radiation // Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. - 2006. - Vol. 6. - P. 205-216.
Barry M., Kell M.R. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis // Breast Cancer Res Treat. - 2011. - Vol. 127. - P. 15-22.
Thomson H.J., Potter S., Greenwood R.J. et al. A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy // Ann Surg. Oncol. - 2008. - Vol. 15(4). - P. 1081-1091.
Chevray P.M. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed // Cancer J. - 2008. - Vol. 14(4). - P. 223-229.
Kronowitz S.J., Robb G.L. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 114(4). - P. 950-960.
Tsoi B., Ziolkowski N.I., Thoma A. et al. Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2014. - Vol. 133. - P. 234-249.
Shah C., Kundu N., Arthur D., Vicini F. Radiation therapy following postmastectomy reconstruction: a systematic review // Ann Surg. Oncol. - 2013. - Vol. 20. - P. 1313-1322.
Jagsi R., Momoh A.O., Qi J. et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction // JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 2018. - Vol. 110(2). - DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx148
Nava M.B., Pennati A.E., Lozza L. et al. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2011. - Vol. 128. - P. 353-359.
Cordeiro P.G., Albornoz C.R., McCormick B. et al. What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 135. - P. 1509-1517.
Santosa K.B., Chen X., Qi J. et al. Postmastectomy radiation therapy and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: is there a better time to irradiate? // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2016. - Vol. 138. - P. 761-769.
Ohri N., Cordeiro P.G., Keam J. et al. Quantifying the impact of immediate reconstruction in postmastectomy radiation: a large, dose-volume histogram-based analysis // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 2012. - Vol. 84. - P. e153-159.
Ho A.Y, Patel N., Ohri N. et al. Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy // Med. Dosim. - 2014. - Vol. 39. - P. 18-22.
Alice Y Ho, Zishuo I. Hu, Babak J. Mehrara, Edwin G. Wilkins. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Review // Lancet Oncol. - 2017. - Vol. 18. - P e742-753.
Khan A.J., Poppe M.M., Goyal S. et al. Hypofractionated postmastectomy radiation therapy is safe and effective: first results from a prospective phase II trial // J. Clin. oncol. - 2017. - Vol. 35. - P. 2037-2043.
Casella D. et al. TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of ret-ropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series // European Journal of Plastic Surgery. - 2014. - № 11 (37). -P. 599-604.
Dieterich M. et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (Ti-LOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. -2013. - № 1 (132). - P. 8e-19e.
Salzberg C.A. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (Allo-Derm) // Annals of plastic surgery. - 2006. - № 1 (57). - P. 1-5.
Forsberg C.G. et al. Aesthetic Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction // Annals of Plastic Surgery. - 2014. - Vol. 72. - P. S116-S120.
Tessler O. et al. Beyond Biologics // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2014. - № 2 (133). - P. 90e-99e.
Logan Ellis H. et al. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. - 2016. - № 1 (14). - P. 121.
Becker H., Lind J.G., Hopkins E.G. Immediate Implant-based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using a Vertical Incision. // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2015. - № 6 (3). - P. e412.
Becker S. et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. - 2009. - №1 (123). - P. 1-6-108.
Bernini M. et al. Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2015. - № 12 (3). - P. e574.
Gamboa-Bobadilla G.M. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix // Annals of plastic surgery. - 2006. - № 1 (56). - P. 22-25.
Hartzell T.L. et al. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. -2010. - № 5 (126). - P. 17111720.
Ibrahim A.M.S. et al. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database in 19,100 Patients Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2013. - № 5 (132). - P. 1057-1066.
Vardanian A.J. et al. Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. -2011. - № 5 (128). - P. 403e-410e.
Salibian A.A. et al. Subcutaneous Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix/Mesh: A Systematic Review // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2016. - № 11 (4). - P. e1139.
Stefano Pompei, Floriana Arelli, Lara Labardi et al. Polyurethane Implants in 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 9-Year Clinical Experience. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2016, 1-6 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw183
Ashley F.L. A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. -1970. - Vol. 45(5). - P. 421-424.
Handel N. Managing local implant-related problems. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. - Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998. - P. 953968.
Handel N., Gutierrez J. Long-term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants // Aesthet. Surg. J. - 2006. - Vol. 26(3). - P. 265-274.
Gasperoni C., Salgarello M., Gargani G. Polyurethane-covered mammary implants: a 12-year experience // Ann. Plast. Surg. - 1992. - Vol. 29(4). - P. 303-308.
Mirr A.L. Polyurethane-coated silicone breast implants: evaluation of 14 years' experience // Rev. Bras. Cir. Plast. - 2009. - Vol. 24. - P. 296-303.
Pompei S., Arelli F., Labardi L. et al. Breast reconstruction with polyurethane implants: preliminary report // Eur. J. Plast. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 35(6). - P. 441-447.
Vzquez G. A ten-year experience using polyurethane-covered breast implants // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 1999. - Vol. 23(3). - P. 189- 196.
Vzquez G., Peltyn A. Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 31(4). - P. 330-336.
Rancati A., Soderini A., Dorr J. et al. One-step breast reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants after skin-sparing mastectomy // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. - 2013. - Vol. 66(12). - P. 1671-1675.
Castel N., Soon-Sutton T., Deptula P. et al. Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year fol -low-up // Arch. Plast. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 42(2). - P. 186-193.
Frame J., Kamel D., Olivan M., Cintra H. The in vivo peri-capsular tissue response to modern polyurethane breast implants // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 39(5). - P. 713-723.
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2019