ОДНОМОМЕНТНАЯ РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ И ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦИОННАЯ ЛУЧЕВАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ: РАЗВИТИЕ КАПСУЛЯРНОЙ КОНТРАКТУРЫ
##article.numberofdownloads## 148
##article.numberofviews## 309
PDF (Русский)

关键词

РАК МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ
ОДНОМОМЕНТНАЯ РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ
АЦЕЛЛЮЛЯРНЫЙ ДЕРМАЛЬНЫЙ МАТРИКС
АДМ
СЕТЧАТЫЙ ИМПЛАНТАТ
МАСТЭКТОМИЯ
ЛУЧЕВАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ
КАПСУЛЯРНАЯ КОНТРАКТУРА
ПОЛИУРЕТАНОВЫЙ ИМПЛАНТ

How to Cite

Зикиряходжаев, А., Широких, И., Аблицова, Н., Ермощенкова, М., Хакимова, Ш., Хакимова, Г., & Тукмаков, А. (2019). ОДНОМОМЕНТНАЯ РЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ МОЛОЧНОЙ ЖЕЛЕЗЫ И ПОСЛЕОПЕРАЦИОННАЯ ЛУЧЕВАЯ ТЕРАПИЯ: РАЗВИТИЕ КАПСУЛЯРНОЙ КОНТРАКТУРЫ. VOPROSY ONKOLOGII, 65(3), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-3-374-385

摘要

Хирургический этап остается основным в комбинированном и комплексном лечении рака молочной железы (РМЖ), а радикальная мастэктомия является по-прежнему основным вариантом хирургического лечения в большинстве клиник России. Отсутствие молочной железы (МЖ) является как физической, так и психологической травмой для женщины и приводит к глубокой деформации личности, значительно ухудшая качество жизни. Таким образом, реконструктивно-пластическая хирургия МЖ стала неотъемлемой частью современной клинической онкологии. Лучевая терапия может привести к развитию осложнений после реконструкции МЖ, и наоборот, реконструированная МЖ может вызвать технические сложности для радиолога для правильного подведения необходимой дозы облучения. Таким образом, перед хирургом и радиологом возникла задача выбора оптимальной последовательности реконструкции и снижения риска развития осложнений в послеоперационном периоде после проведения лучевой терапии на эндопротез без ущерба для онкологических или косметических результатов реконструированной железы.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-3-374-385
##article.numberofdownloads## 148
##article.numberofviews## 309
PDF (Русский)

参考

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В. Заболеваемость и смертность в 2016 году. - Москва, 2017г.

Захарков Л.И. Подкожные радикальные мастэктомии с первичной реконструкцией при лечении больных раком молочной железы: диссертация.. кандидата медицинских наук 2006г.

Gieni M., Avram R., Dickson L. et al. Local Breast cancer recurrence after mastectomy and immediate Breast reconstruction for invasive cancer: a metaanalysis // Breast. - 2012. - Vol. 21. - P. 230-236.

Park S.H., Han W., Yoo T.K. et al. Oncologic Safety of Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Invasive Breast Cancer Patients: A Matched Case Control Study // J. Breast Cancer. - 2016. - Vol. 19 (1). - P. 68-75.

Meretoja T.J., von Smitten K.A., Leidenius M.H. et al. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15 year series // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2007. - Vol.33. - P. 1142-1145.

Truong P.T., Woodward W.A., Bucholz T.A. Optimizing lo-coregional control and survival for women with breast cancer: a review of current developments in postmastectomy radiation // Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. - 2006. - Vol. 6. - P. 205-216.

Barry M., Kell M.R. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis // Breast Cancer Res Treat. - 2011. - Vol. 127. - P. 15-22.

Thomson H.J., Potter S., Greenwood R.J. et al. A prospective longitudinal study of cosmetic outcome in immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and the influence of radiotherapy // Ann Surg. Oncol. - 2008. - Vol. 15(4). - P. 1081-1091.

Chevray P.M. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed // Cancer J. - 2008. - Vol. 14(4). - P. 223-229.

Kronowitz S.J., Robb G.L. Breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy: current issues // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 114(4). - P. 950-960.

Tsoi B., Ziolkowski N.I., Thoma A. et al. Safety of tissue expander/implant versus autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2014. - Vol. 133. - P. 234-249.

Shah C., Kundu N., Arthur D., Vicini F. Radiation therapy following postmastectomy reconstruction: a systematic review // Ann Surg. Oncol. - 2013. - Vol. 20. - P. 1313-1322.

Jagsi R., Momoh A.O., Qi J. et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction // JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. - 2018. - Vol. 110(2). - DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx148

Nava M.B., Pennati A.E., Lozza L. et al. Outcome of different timings of radiotherapy in implant-based breast reconstructions // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2011. - Vol. 128. - P. 353-359.

Cordeiro P.G., Albornoz C.R., McCormick B. et al. What is the optimum timing of postmastectomy radiotherapy in two-stage prosthetic reconstruction: radiation to the tissue expander or permanent implant? // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 135. - P. 1509-1517.

Santosa K.B., Chen X., Qi J. et al. Postmastectomy radiation therapy and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: is there a better time to irradiate? // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. - 2016. - Vol. 138. - P. 761-769.

Ohri N., Cordeiro P.G., Keam J. et al. Quantifying the impact of immediate reconstruction in postmastectomy radiation: a large, dose-volume histogram-based analysis // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. - 2012. - Vol. 84. - P. e153-159.

Ho A.Y, Patel N., Ohri N. et al. Bilateral implant reconstruction does not affect the quality of postmastectomy radiation therapy // Med. Dosim. - 2014. - Vol. 39. - P. 18-22.

Alice Y Ho, Zishuo I. Hu, Babak J. Mehrara, Edwin G. Wilkins. Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. Review // Lancet Oncol. - 2017. - Vol. 18. - P e742-753.

Khan A.J., Poppe M.M., Goyal S. et al. Hypofractionated postmastectomy radiation therapy is safe and effective: first results from a prospective phase II trial // J. Clin. oncol. - 2017. - Vol. 35. - P. 2037-2043.

Casella D. et al. TiLoop® Bra mesh used for immediate breast reconstruction: comparison of ret-ropectoral and subcutaneous implant placement in a prospective single-institution series // European Journal of Plastic Surgery. - 2014. - № 11 (37). -P. 599-604.

Dieterich M. et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (Ti-LOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. -2013. - № 1 (132). - P. 8e-19e.

Salzberg C.A. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (Allo-Derm) // Annals of plastic surgery. - 2006. - № 1 (57). - P. 1-5.

Forsberg C.G. et al. Aesthetic Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction // Annals of Plastic Surgery. - 2014. - Vol. 72. - P. S116-S120.

Tessler O. et al. Beyond Biologics // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2014. - № 2 (133). - P. 90e-99e.

Logan Ellis H. et al. Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. - 2016. - № 1 (14). - P. 121.

Becker H., Lind J.G., Hopkins E.G. Immediate Implant-based Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Using a Vertical Incision. // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2015. - № 6 (3). - P. e412.

Becker S. et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. - 2009. - №1 (123). - P. 1-6-108.

Bernini M. et al. Subcutaneous Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Surgical, Functional, and Aesthetic Results after Long-Term Follow-Up // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2015. - № 12 (3). - P. e574.

Gamboa-Bobadilla G.M. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix // Annals of plastic surgery. - 2006. - № 1 (56). - P. 22-25.

Hartzell T.L. et al. The use of human acellular dermal matrix for the correction of secondary deformities after breast augmentation: results and costs // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. -2010. - № 5 (126). - P. 17111720.

Ibrahim A.M.S. et al. Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database in 19,100 Patients Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2013. - № 5 (132). - P. 1057-1066.

Vardanian A.J. et al. Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix // Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. -2011. - № 5 (128). - P. 403e-410e.

Salibian A.A. et al. Subcutaneous Implant-based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix/Mesh: A Systematic Review // Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open. - 2016. - № 11 (4). - P. e1139.

Stefano Pompei, Floriana Arelli, Lara Labardi et al. Polyurethane Implants in 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction: 9-Year Clinical Experience. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 2016, 1-6 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw183

Ashley F.L. A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. -1970. - Vol. 45(5). - P. 421-424.

Handel N. Managing local implant-related problems. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. - Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998. - P. 953968.

Handel N., Gutierrez J. Long-term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants // Aesthet. Surg. J. - 2006. - Vol. 26(3). - P. 265-274.

Gasperoni C., Salgarello M., Gargani G. Polyurethane-covered mammary implants: a 12-year experience // Ann. Plast. Surg. - 1992. - Vol. 29(4). - P. 303-308.

Mirr A.L. Polyurethane-coated silicone breast implants: evaluation of 14 years' experience // Rev. Bras. Cir. Plast. - 2009. - Vol. 24. - P. 296-303.

Pompei S., Arelli F., Labardi L. et al. Breast reconstruction with polyurethane implants: preliminary report // Eur. J. Plast. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 35(6). - P. 441-447.

Vzquez G. A ten-year experience using polyurethane-covered breast implants // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 1999. - Vol. 23(3). - P. 189- 196.

Vzquez G., Peltyn A. Polyurethane-coated silicone gel breast implants used for 18 years // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 31(4). - P. 330-336.

Rancati A., Soderini A., Dorr J. et al. One-step breast reconstruction with polyurethane-covered implants after skin-sparing mastectomy // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. - 2013. - Vol. 66(12). - P. 1671-1675.

Castel N., Soon-Sutton T., Deptula P. et al. Polyurethane-coated breast implants revisited: a 30-year fol -low-up // Arch. Plast. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 42(2). - P. 186-193.

Frame J., Kamel D., Olivan M., Cintra H. The in vivo peri-capsular tissue response to modern polyurethane breast implants // Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. - 2015. - Vol. 39(5). - P. 713-723.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2019