Results of the Study of Two Fractionation Regimens in Grade 4 Gliomas
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 2
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

gliomas of grade 4 malignancy
fractionation regimen
overall survival

How to Cite

Chuguev, A. S., Gerasimov, V. A., Kaprin, A. D., & Datsenko, P. V. (2025). Results of the Study of Two Fractionation Regimens in Grade 4 Gliomas. Voprosy Onkologii, 71(5), OF–2206. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-5-OF-2206

Abstract

Introduction. The article presents the final results of a study of two fractionation regimens for grade 4 gliomas.

Materials and Methods. A total of 140 patients had morphologically confirmed grade 4 glioma. In patients younger than 50 years and in the older age group (≥ 50 years), fractionation with a prescribed dose of 2 and 3 Gy was used alternately. As a result, thanks to the pairwise selection strategy, 23 patients younger than 50 years and 47 patients older than 50 years were recruited in the groups with two fractionation regimens, respectively.

Results. In the group with the fractionation regime of 2 Gy, a fatal outcome was recorded in 61 out of 70 patients (87.1 %), of the 52 patients with the fractionation regime of 3 Gy, 70 (74.3 %) died. In the group with the prescribed dose of 3 Gy, the median overall survival was 22.34 months (95 % Cl: 12.4-32.3), with the standard fractionation regimen (2 Gy) — 18.50 months (p = 0.039). Hypofractional regimen with a prescribed dose of 3 Gy was more effective in patients with grade 4 glioma over the age of 45 years (p = 0.007), with methylation of the MGMT promoter (p = 0.0009), and the absence of rapid early progression (REP) between microsurgery and radiation therapy (p = 0.014). The median overall survival for the hypofractionation regimen with a dose of 3 Gy in the «NonREP» group aged ≥ 45 years was 42.32 months (95 % CL: 25.7-58.9), with standard fractionation (2 Gy) — 19.68 months (95 % CL: 8.5-30.8; p = 0.005). In the remaining 76 patients there were no differences in survival depending on the fractionation regime, the median was 18.82 and 17.21 months in the 3/2 Gy groups, respectively (p = 0.793).

Conclusion. The hypo fraction regimen with a prescribed dose of 3 Gy is not inferior to the standard radiation therapy program, and in some subgroups exceeds it.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-5-OF-2206
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 2
pdf (Русский)

References

Walker M.D., Strike T.A., Sheline G.E. An analysis of dose-effect relationship in the radiotherapy of malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979; 5(10): 1725-31.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(79)90553-4.

Chan J.L., Lee S.W., Fraass B.A., et al. Survival and failure patterns of high-grade glioma after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2002; 20(6): 1635-42.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1635.

Stupp R., Hegi M.E., Mason W.P., et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 10(5):459-66.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7.

Улитин А.Ю., Желудкова О.Г., Иванов П.И., et al. Практические рекомендации по лекарственному лечению первичных опухолей центральной нервной системы. Злокачественные опухоли: Практические рекомендации RUSSCO #3s2. 2022; 12(3s2-1): 113-140.- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-113-140. [Ulitin A.Yu., Zheludkova O.G., Ivanov P.I., et al. Practical Guidelines for the Drug Treatment of Primary Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Malignant tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2. 2022; 12(3s2-1): 113-140.- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18027/2224-5057-2022-12-3s2-113-140. (In Rus)].

Horbinski C., Nabors L.B., Portnow J., et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: central nervous system cancers, version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023; 21(1): 12-20-DOI: https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2023.0002.

Hingorani M., Colley W.P., Dixit S., Beavis A.M. Hypofractionated radiotherapy for glioblastoma: strategy for poor-risk patients or hope for the future? Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1017): 770-781.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/83827377.

Khan, L., Soliman H., Sahgal A., et al. External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (8): CD011475.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011475.pub2.

Roa W., Brasher P.M.A., Bauman G., et al. Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(9): 1583-8.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.06.082.

Malmström A., Grønberg B.H., Marosi C., et al. Temozolomide versus standard 6-week radiotherapy versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients older than 60 years with glioblastoma: the Nordic randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(9): 916-26.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70265-6.

Roa W., Kepka L., Narendra Kumar N., et al. International Atomic Energy Agency randomized phase III study of radiation therapy in elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 10; 33(35): 4145-50.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.6606.

Дружинин В.Н. Экспериментальная психология: Учебное пособие. М.: ИНФРА-М. 1997: 256.-eLIBRARY ID: 20446570. [Druzhinin V.N. Experimental Psychology: Textbook. M.: INFRA-M. 1997: 256s.-eLIBRARY ID: 20446570. (In Rus)].

Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P., et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021; 23(8): 1231-1251.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106.

Даценко П.В., Кобылецкая Т.М., Чугуев А.С., et al. Раннее прогрессирование до лучевой терапии при глиобластоме. Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2023; 87(3): 40-46.- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238703140. [Datsenko P.V., Kobyletskaya T.M., Chuguev A.S., et al. Early progression of glioblastoma before radiotherapy. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2023; 87(3): 40-46.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238703140. (In Rus)].

Кобылецкая Т.М., Чугуев А.С., Герасимов В.А., et al. Ранняя химиотерапия между хирургическим вмешательством и лучевой терапией при глиомах 4-й степени злокачественности. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2024; 13(5): 12-17.- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20241305112. [Kobyletskaya T.M., Chuguev A.S., Gerasimov V.A., et al. Early chemotherapy between surgery and radiotherapy in grade 4 gliomas. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2024; 13(5): 12-17.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/onkolog20241305112. (In Rus)].

Louis D.N., Perry A., Wesseling P., et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021; 23(8): 1231-1251.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106.

Iuchi T., Hatano K., Kodama T., et al. Phase 2 trial of hypofractionated high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88(4): 793-800.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.011.

Shenouda G.A., Souhami L., Petrecca K., et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant temozolomide followed by hypofractionated accelerated radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 97(3): 487-494.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.006.

Даценко П.В., Измайлов Т.Р., Паньшин Г.А. Выбор программ лечения при глиомах высокой степени злокачественности с учетом адаптированной версии классификации RPA. Онкология. Журнал им. П.А. Герцена. 2014; 2(6): 19-27.- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oncolog2014619-27. [Datsenko P.V., Izmailov T.R., G.A. Panshin G.A. Selection of treatment of programs for high-grade gliomas having regard to an adapted version of the RPA classification. P.A. Herzen Journal of Oncology. 2014; 2(6): 19-27.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/oncolog2014619-27. (In Rus)].

Чугуев А.С., Кобылецкая Т.М., Герасимов В.А. et al. Выбор режима фракционирования при глиомах IV степени злокачественности в зависимости от быстрого раннего прогрессирования (REP). Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н.Н. Бурденко. 2024; 88(5): 23-29.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248805123. [Chuguev A.S., Kobyletskaya T.M., Gerasimov V.A. et al. Choice of fractionation regimen for Grade IV gliomas depending on rapid early progression. Burdenko's Journal of Neurosurgery. 2024; 88(5): 23-29.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20248805123. (In Rus)].

Чугуев А.С, Герасимов В.А., Беликова А.А., et al. Выбор режима фракционирования при глиомах 4 степени злокачественности в зависимости от возраста пациентов. Радиация и риск. 2024; 33(3): 143-153.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2024-33-3-143-153. [Chuguev A.S., Gerasimov V.A., Belikova A.A., et al. The choice of dose fractionation regimen for grade 4 gliomas, depending on the age of patients. Radiation and Risk. 2024; 33(3): 143-153.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.21870/0131-3878-2024-33-3-143-153. (In Rus)].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2025