Interlaboratory Quality Control of BRAF Mutation Testing: The Experience of the Russian Organization of Molecular Geneticists in Oncology and Oncohematology
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 1
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

BRAF gene mutations
molecular oncology
quality control

How to Cite

Demidova, I. A., Aleksakhina, S. N., Druy А. E., Kekeeva, T. V., Martianov, A. S., Tretiakova, Y. I., Firsova, N. A., Filipenko, M. L., Tsaur, G. A., Tsukanov, A. S., & Imyanitov, E. N. (2025). Interlaboratory Quality Control of BRAF Mutation Testing: The Experience of the Russian Organization of Molecular Geneticists in Oncology and Oncohematology . Voprosy Onkologii, 71(6), OF–2485. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2485

Abstract

Introduction. Tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations demonstrate sensitivity to BRAF kinase inhibitors. Molecular genetic testing for this mutation represents an essential diagnostic component for cutaneous melanoma, colorectal, lung, and thyroid carcinomas, among other malignancies. Reported BRAF mutation frequencies In Russian cutaneous melanoma patients range from 28 to 60 %, suggesting substantial interlaboratory variability in testing procedures.

Aim. To assess the quality of BRAF mutation testing across various diagnostic laboratories.

Materials and Methods. A quality control panel comprised 15 melanoma samples with concordant BRAF status confirmed by two reference laboratories of the Russian Organization of Molecular Geneticists in Oncology and Oncohematology.

Results. The samples were distributed to 13 laboratories expressing preliminary interest in participation. Ten laboratories accepted the samples for analysis. Four demonstrated satisfactory performance: one laboratory achieved 100 % concordance, while three made a single testing error. No false-positive results were recorded. Primary reasons for unsatisfactory performance included failure to meet the predefined 2-week testing deadline (two laboratories), ≥ 2 false-negative results (three laboratories), and refusal to process >50 % of samples due to unavailable tumor dissection capabilities (one laboratory).

Conclusion. This initiative reveals significant quality variations in molecular genetic testing across laboratories, highlighting the need for further efforts to reduce diagnostic errors in mutation analysis.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2025-71-6-OF-2485
##article.numberofdownloads## 0
##article.numberofviews## 1
pdf (Русский)

References

Davies H., Bignell G.R., Cox C., et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002; 417(6892): 949-54.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00766.

Roa P., Bremer N.V., Foglizzo V., Cocco E. Mutations in the serine/threonine kinase BRAF: oncogenic drivers in solid tumors. Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(6): 1215.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061215.

Halle B.R., Johnson D.B. Defining and targeting BRAF mutations in solid tumors. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021; 22(4): 30.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-021-00827-2.

Gouda M.A., Subbiah V. Precision oncology for BRAF-mutant cancers with BRAF and MEK inhibitors: from melanoma to tissue-agnostic therapy. ESMO Open. 2023; 8(2): 100788.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100788.

Aleksakhina S.N., Ivantsov A.O., Imyanitov E.N. Agnostic Administration of targeted anticancer drugs: Looking for a balance between hype and caution. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7): 4094.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25074094.

Imyanitov E.N., Mitiushkina N.V., Kuligina E.S., et al. Pathways and targeting avenues of BRAF in non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2024; 28(7): 613-622.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2024.2374742.

Heinzerling L., Kühnapfel S., Meckbach D., et al. Rare BRAF mutations in melanoma patients: implications for molecular testing in clinical practice. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(10): 2164-71.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.143.

Qu K., Pan Q., Zhang X., et al. Detection of BRAF V600 mutations in metastatic melanoma: comparison of the Cobas 4800 and Sanger sequencing assays. J Mol Diagn. 2013; 15(6): 790-5.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.07.003.

Bauer J., Büttner P., Murali R., et al. BRAF mutations in cutaneous melanoma are independently associated with age, anatomic site of the primary tumor, and the degree of solar elastosis at the primary tumor site. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2011; 24(2): 345-51.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-148X.2011.00837.x.

Frank G.A., Aleksakhina S.N., Zavalishina L.E., et al. BRAF and NRAS mutations In Russian melanoma patients: results of a nationwide study. Melanoma Res. 2016; 26(5): 442-7.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000278.

Кит О.И., Водолажский Д.И., Ефимова И.Ю., et al. Связь клинико-морфологических особенностей и мутационного статуса гена BRAF в качестве прогностического фактора у больных меланомой кожи. Медицинская генетика. 2016; 15(6): 19-24. [Kit O.I., Vodolazhsky D.I., Efimova I.Yu., et al. Relationship of clinical and morphological features and mutational status of the BRAF gene as a prognostic factor in patients with skin melanoma. Medical Genetics. 2016; 15(6): 19-24 (In Rus)].

Орлова К.В., Демидов Л.В. Распространенность различных подтипов мутации в гене BRAF у пациентов с метастатической меланомой в России на основании собственных исследований. Эффективная фармакотерапия. 2024; 20(22): 38-40.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2024-20-22-38-40. [Orlova K.V., Demidov L.V. Prevalence of various subtypes of mutation in the BRAF gene in patients with metastatic melanoma In Russia based on their own research. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2024; 20(22): 38-40.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2024-20-22-38-40 (In Rus)].

Титов К.С., Сорокина М.В., Лебедев С.С., et al. Взаимосвязь клинико-морфологических параметров с BRAF-статусом опухоли у пациентов с меланомой кожи I стадии. Вестник медицинского института «РЕА-ВИЗ»: Реабилитация, Врач и Здоровье. 2024; 14(3): 74-82.-URL: https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2024.3.CLIN.2. [Titov K.S., Sorokina M.V., Lebedev S.S., et al. The relationship of clinical and morphological parameters with the BRAF status of the tumor in patients with stage I skin melanoma. Bulletin of the Medical Institute REAVIZ (Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health). 2024; 14(3): 74-82.-DOI: https://doi.org/10.20340/vmi-rvz.2024.3.CLIN.2 (In Rus)].

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2023 году (заболеваемость и смертность). Под ред. Каприна А.Д., Старинского В.В., Шахзадовой А.О. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2024; 276. [Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Shakhzadova A.O., Malignant neoplasms In Russia in 2023 (morbidity and mortality). Ed. by Kaprina A.D., Starinsky V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Medical Research Institute — branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution ‘NMRC of Radiology’ of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2024; 276 (In Rus)].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2025