COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM STATE, BODY WEIGHT AND ASSOCIATED HORMONAL FACTORS IN VARIOUS MOLECULAR-BIOLOGICAL TYPES OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
MOLECULAR-BIOLOGICAL TYPES
HORMONAL-METABOLIC STATE

How to Cite

Bershteyn, L., Poroshina, T., Radzhabova, Z., Kovalenko, I., Ivantsov, A., Ievleva, A., & Berlev, I. (2018). COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM STATE, BODY WEIGHT AND ASSOCIATED HORMONAL FACTORS IN VARIOUS MOLECULAR-BIOLOGICAL TYPES OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER. Voprosy Onkologii, 64(3), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-3-394-399

Abstract

Aims: The tradition of dividing endometrial cancer (EC) into two types - which existed for many decades - has undergone significant changes over the past few years. The aim of this work was to collect data on important aspect of hormonal-metabolic status in patients having one of the four EC types which compose a modern molecular-biological classification of this tumor.

Materials and methods: The division of EC into types (234 tumors from patients predominantly of postmenopausal age) was based on the classification of this carcinoma, which includes cases with mutations in tumor tissue of DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE), signs of mismatch repair deficiency - microsatellite instability (MMR-D), expression of the multifunctional protein p53 and, finally, with the absence of these three features. In the studies of hormone-metabolic status, depending on the methodology, materials from a varying number of patients were involved.

Results and conclusions: It has been established that EC patients, carriers of the POLE mutations, are characterized by a lower body mass index (BMI), a decreased incidence of overt diabetes and a lower ratio of leptin/adiponectin in the serum. For patients with EC having signs of MMR-D, an increase in BMI and the most pronounced tendency to disturbances in carbohydrate metabolism were found, while for patients with increased expression of oncoprotein p53 were characteristic frequent detection of patients with low body weight (BMI <25.0) and a trend towards a decrease in the insulin resistance index. In conditionally “triply negative” type (not having three listed markers: POLE mutations, MMR-D signs and p53 hyperexpression), uterine body cancer patients revealed highest average BMI value and positive correlation of BMI with the level of leptinemia. The data obtained indicate the need for a selective approach to the prevention of different types of EC and for the study on the association of revealed type-specific features with the further course of the disease.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-3-394-399
PDF (Русский)

References

Бохман ЯВ. Рак тела матки. Кишинев: Штиинца. 1972, 202с

Sherman ME. Theories of endometrial carcinogenesis: a multidisciplinary approach. Mod. Pathol. 2000 Mar; 13, 295-308. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880051

Берштейн Л.М. Эпидемиология, патогенез и пути профилактики рака эндометрия: стабильность или эволюция? Практическая онкология. 2004, т.5(1), 1-8

Kandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD et al. for the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013 May; 497(7447): 67-73. DOI: 10.1038/nature12113

Murali R, Soslow RA, Weigelt B. Classification of endometrial carcinoma: more than two types. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun; 15(7): e268-e278. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70591-6

Berstein L.M. Renovated (nondual) approach to endometrial cancer typing: endocrine and inflammatory issues. Future Oncol. 2017;13(2):109-112.

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer. 2015; 113(2):299-310. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.190

Hoang LN, Kinloch MA, Leo JM et al. Interobserver Agreement in Endometrial Carcinoma Histotype Diagnosis Varies Depending on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-based Molecular Subgroup. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(2):245-252. 10.1097/ PAS. 0000000000000764. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000764

Вторушин С.В., Малых РД. Современные предпосылки для молекулярно-генетической классификации рака эндометрия. Архив патологии. 2017;79(3): 57-62.

Joehlin-Price AS, Perrino CM, Stephens J et al. Mismatch repair protein expression in 1049 endometrial carcinomas, associations with body mass index, and other clinicopathologic variables. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014 Apr; 133(1): 43-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.017

Roque DR, Makowski L, Chen TH et al. Association between differential gene expression and body mass index among endometrial cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Aug;142(2):317-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.06.006

Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S et al. Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics-based clinical classifier for endometrial Cancer. Cancer. 2017; 123(5): 802-813 (2017). DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30496

Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM et al. Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(16):4215-24. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2878

Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю., ред. Алгоритмы оказания специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. Вып. 8. Сахарный диабет. 2017; 20(1S):1-112. 10.14341/ DM20171S8 DOI: 10.14341/DM20171S8

American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2017; 40 (Suppl 1): S11-24, , PMID 27979889]. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-S005

Берштейн Л.М., Берлев И.В., Балтрукова А.Н., Иевлева А.Г, Иванцов А.О. Перестройка представлений о раке эндометрия: признаки и реальность. Вопр. онкол. 2018; 64(1): 144-150.

Edmondson RJ, Crosbie EJ, Nickkho-Amiry M et al. Markers of the p53 pathway further refine molecular profiling in high-risk endometrial cancer: A Trans PORTEC initiative. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146(2):327-333. 10.1016/j. ygyno.2017.05.014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.014

McAlpine JN, Temkin SM, Mackay HJ. Endometrial cancer: Not your grandmother’s Cancer. Cancer. 2016 Sep 15;122(18):2787-2798. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30094

Рак эндометрия. Под ред. И. В. Берлева, Л. М. Берштейна, А. Ф. Урманчеевой. - Санкт-Петербург: Эко-Вектор, 2017. - 260с. ISBN 978-5-906648-40

Luo J, Beresford S, Chen С et al. Association between diabetes, diabetes treatment and risk of developing endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(7):1432-1439. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.407

Коваленко И.М., Берштейн Л.М. Сравнительные гормон-ассоциированные и клинико-морфологические особенности рака молочной железы и эндометрия у больных, страдающих и не страдающих диабетом/ Вопросы онкологии, 2017; 63(5), 752-757

Чернышова А.Л., Коломиец Л.А., Юнусова Н.В. и др. Гормонально-метаболические особенности у больных гиперпластическими процессами и раком эндометрия. Медицинский альманах, 2012; 4(23): 36-38

Zeng F, Shi J, Long Y et al. Adiponectin and Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015; 36(4):1670-1678.

Setiawan VW, Yang HP, Pike MC et al. Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors? J. Clin. Oncol. 2013; 31(20), 2607-2018. 10.1200/ JCO.2012.48.2596. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2596

Busch EL, Crous-Bou M, Prescott J et al. Adiponectin, Leptin, and Insulin-Pathway Receptors as Endometrial Cancer Subtyping Markers. Horm Cancer. 2018; 9(1):33 39. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-017-0318-1

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2018