OPTIMIZATION IN DIEP FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTION (DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP) WITH THE HELP OF CT(A) AND 3D MAPPING
##article.numberofdownloads## 50
##article.numberofviews## 203
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

BREAST CANCER
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

How to Cite

Pesotskiy, R., Kalinin, P., Krivorotko, P., Mishchenko, A., Zernov, K., Kozyreva, K., Yemelyanov, A., Boyko, N., Chernaya, A., Bessonov, A., Gigolaeva, L., Yereshchenko, S., Shishova, A., Tabagua, T., Ivanova, O., & Semiglazov, V. (2019). OPTIMIZATION IN DIEP FLAP BREAST RECONSTRUCTION (DEEP INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC ARTERY PERFORATOR FLAP) WITH THE HELP OF CT(A) AND 3D MAPPING. Voprosy Onkologii, 65(4), 603–607. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-4-603-607

Abstract

Introduction: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP-flap) reconstruction provides the most acceptable aesthetic result among autologous breast reconstruction. However, a thorough preoperative assessment of the individual vascular anatomy of the deep lower epigastric vessels (DIEA/V) is still challlenging. Usage of CT(a) allows define individual anatomical features such as: intramuscular stroke, tortuosity of vessels and their branches which is an essential thing for reducing of the operation time, flap ischemia time, decreasing the complication rate.

Material and methods: with the help of Radiology Department, we have launched a new protocol for planning of the DIEP flap surgery. As a preoperative preparation, we perform CT angiography (CTA) according to a specific protocol, which allows us to reduce the trauma of aponeurosis and the rectus abdominis muscle.

Сonclusion: preoperative CT angiography, performed according to a special scanning and post-processing protocol, allows us to optimize the planning of the surgical intervention and improving the results of breast reconstruction. Detailed study of the topography of the vessels of the anterior abdominal wall leads to a decrease in tissue injury of the anterior abdominal wall. This article describes the importance of CT angiography, for the preoperative preparation (visualization) as a crucial step in preparing for the DIEP reconstruction of the breast.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-4-603-607
##article.numberofdownloads## 50
##article.numberofviews## 203
PDF (Русский)

References

Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLoBoCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2018. 68: 394-424.

Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M. et al. sEER Cancer statistics Review, 1975-2014, national Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, based on November 2016 sEER data submission, posted to the sEER web site, April 2017.

national Comprehensive Cancer network (NCCN). Practice Guidelines in oncology: Breast Cancer. Version 2.2017.

Arroyo J. M. G., Lpez M. L. Psychological problems derived from mastectomy: a qualitative study. International journal of surgical oncology. 2011. 2011: 132461.

Yang R. L., Kelz R. R., Czerniecki B. J. Immediate reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: one option for young breast cancer patients with early stage disease. Journal of thoracic disease. 2013. 3: 200.

Chen W., Lv X., Xu X. et al. Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018. 4: 464-469.

Qin Q., Tan Q., Lian B. et al. Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study. Medicine. 2018. 5: 9766.

Pirro O., Mestak O., Vindigni V. et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 2017. 1: 1217.

Pollhammer M.S., Duscher D., Schmidt M. et al. Recent advances in microvascular autologous breast reconstruction after ablative tumor surgery. World journal of clinical oncology. 2016. 7: 114.

Zhong T., McCarthy C., Min S. et al. Patient satisfaction and health related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: A prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer. 2012. 118: 1701-1709.

Matros E., Albornoz C.R., Razdan S.N. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q //Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015. 135: 937-946.

Molina A.R., Jones M.E., Hazari A. et al. Correlating the deep inferior epigastric artery branching pattern with type of abdominal free flap performed in a series of 145 breast reconstruction patients. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2012. 94: 493-495.

Kim H., Lim S.Y, Pyon J.K. et al. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2012. 130: 11-20.

Tong W.M., Dixon R., Ekis H. et al. The impact of preoperative CT angiography on breast reconstruction with abdominal perforator flaps. Annals of plastic surgery. 2012. 68: 525-530.

Anstett P. Breast Cancer Surgery and Reconstruction: What's Right For You. - Rowman

Karunanithy N., Rose V., Lim A.K. et al. CT angiography of inferior epigastric and gluteal perforating arteries before free flap breast reconstruction. Radiographics. 2011. 31: 1307-1319.

Greenspun D., Vasile J., Levine J. et al. Anatomic imaging of abdominal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance imaging angiography. Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. 2010. 26: 37-44.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2019