The Role of Nutritional Support on the Recovery of Patients with Hodgkin's Lymphoma during High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
##article.numberofdownloads## 119
##article.numberofviews## 243
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

Hodgkin's lymphoma
high-dose chemotherapy
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
nutritional support

How to Cite

Volchenkov, S. A., Filatova, L. V., Зюзгин, И. С., Ishmatova, I. V., Zverkova, A. A., Motalkina, M. S., Julia A. Nikulina, J. A., Dobrovolskaya , E. V., Elkhova, S. S., Koviazin, A. K., Kramynin, L. A., Kolupaev, N. S., Isimbaeva, A. A., & Semiglazova, T. (2023). The Role of Nutritional Support on the Recovery of Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma during High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Voprosy Onkologii, 69(4), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-4-722-731

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the role of combined nutritional support (NS) in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).

Materials and methods. The study included 138 patients. The control group consisted of 68 patients with HL who underwent HDCT with auto-HSCT and received NS using supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN). The experimental group included 70 patients who received NS using enteral nutrition (EN) and PN, following an internal NS protocol. The primary endpoints of the study were the engraftment time of the transplant and the hematopoietic recovery time, while the secondary endpoint was the risk of developing mucositis.

Results. The engraftment time of the bone marrow transplant did not show a statistically significant difference between the experimental group (median 10 days [IQR: 9-11]) and the control group (median 10 days [IQR: 9-11]), p = 0,771. Similarly, the hematopoietic recovery time did not differ significantly between the groups: median 12 days (IQR: 11-13) vs. 12 days (IQR: 10-14), p = 0.936. The duration of agranulocytosis also showed no statistical difference between the groups: median 6 days (IQR: 5-8) in the control group versus 7 days (IQR: 6-8) in the experimental group (p = 0.083). However, the median days of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-CSF) therapy in the control group were -13 (IQR: 12-14) days, while in the experimental group — 10 days (IQR: 9-12), with p < 0.001.

The frequency of severe mucositis was higher in the control group compared to the patients in the experimental group (31 vs. 20, respectively, p < 0.05), which resulted in a greater need for nasogastric tube placement (11 cases in the group without NS and 4 cases in the group with NS, p < 0.05).

Conclusion. The study results demonstrated that the addition of combined NS does not affect the transplant engraftment time and the hematopoietic recovery time. However, it does reduce the risk of developing severe mucositis.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-4-722-731
##article.numberofdownloads## 119
##article.numberofviews## 243
pdf (Русский)

References

Benekou K, Montoto S. Role of stem cell transplant in lymphoma in the era of new drugs. Current Opinion Oncology. 2017;29(6):455-459. doi:10.1097/cco.0000000000000403.

Mochkin NE, Sarzhevskii VO, Dubinina YuN, et al. Outcome of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma treatment based on highdose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the experience in the NI Pirogov Russian National Medical Center of Surgery. Clinical Oncohematology. 2018;11(3):234-40. doi:10.21320/2500-2139-2018-11-3-234-240.

Passweg J, Baldomero H, Basak GW, et al. The EBMT activity survey report 2017: a focus on allogeneic HCT for nonmalignant indications and on the use of non-HCT cell therapies. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2019;54(10):1575-1585. doi:10.1038/s41409-019-0465-9.

Baumgartner A, Hoskin K, Schuetz P. Optimization of nutrition during allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2018;21(3):152-158. doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000461.

Bechard L, Feldman H, Venick R, et al. Attenuation of resting energy expenditure following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2012;47(10):1301-1306. doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.19.

Bechard LJ, Feldman HA, Venick R, et al. Attenuation of resting energy expenditure following hematopoietic SCT in children. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2012;47(10):1301-6. doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.19.

Guièze R, Lemal R, Cabrespine A, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clinical Nutrition. 2014;33(3):533-8. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.07.012.

Baumgartner A, Hoskin K, Schuetz P. Optimization of nutrition during allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018;21(3):152-158. doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000461.

Andersen S. Banks M, Brown T, et al. J. Nutrition support during allogeneic stem cell transplantation: evidence versus practice. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(11):5441-5447. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05397-x.

Lazarow H, Nicolo M, Compher C, et al. Nutrition-related outcomes for autologous stem cell transplantation patients. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19(7):e393-e398. doi:10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.002.

Sommacal H, Gazal C, Jochims A, et al. Clinical impact of systematic nutritional care in adults submitted to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Rev Bras Hematol e Hemoterapia 2012;34(5):334-38. doi:10.5581/1516-8484.20120088.

Trifilio S, Helenowski I, Giel M, et al. Questioning the role of a neutropenic diet following hematopoetic stem cell transplantation. biol blood marrow transplantat. 2012;18(9):1385-1390. doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.02.015.

Guièze R, Lemal R, Cabrespine A, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Clinical Nutrition. 2014;33(3):533-8. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.07.012.

Zama D, Gori D, Muratore E, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition as nutritional support after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. transplantation and cellular therapy. 2021;27(2):180.e1-180.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2020.11.006.

Zama D, Gori D, Muratore E, et al. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition as nutritional support after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021;27(2):180.e1-180.e8. doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2020.11.006.

Baumgartner A, Bargetzi A, Zueger N, et al. Revisiting nutritional support for allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation-a systematic review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(4):506-513. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.310.

Sahin U, Toprak S, Atilla P, et al. An overview of infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Infect Chemother. (2016);22:505-14. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2016.05.006.

Dissanaike K, Gura K, Lee S, et al. Safety and efficacy of a fish-oil-based fat emulsion in the treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. Pediatrics. 2008;121(3):678-686. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2248.

Iyama S, Sato T, Tatsumi H, et al. Efficacy of enteral supplementation enriched with glutamine, fiber, and oligosaccharide on mucosal injury following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Case Rep Oncol. 2014;7(3):692-699. doi:10.1159/000368714.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023