Study of the Effectiveness of Personalized Rehabilitation for Resectable Lung Cancer Patients
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

resectable non-small cell lung cancer
quality of life
personalized rehabilitation model

How to Cite

Kasparov, B. S., Kovlen, D. V., Semiglazova, T. Y., Kondratieva, K. O., Ponomarenko, G. N., Filatova, L. V., Kluge, V. A., Donskih, R. V., Semiglazov, V. V., Levchenko, E. V., & Belyaev, A. M. (2023). Study of the Effectiveness of Personalized Rehabilitation for Resectable Lung Cancer Patients. Voprosy Onkologii, 69(5), 908–916. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-5-908-916

Abstract

 An increase in the life expectancy of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after complex treatment is associated with psychological and physical impairments that reduce the overall quality of life. The article evaluates the efficacy of rehabilitation programs in NSCLC patients, considering recommended technologies (RT) of physical and rehabilitation medicine (personalized approach) in comparison to standard rehabilitation methods.

Materials and methods. The study included 240 patients with resectable NSCLC aged 45 to 71 years (median 60.2 years) who underwent rehabilitation as part of combined/complex treatment at the N.N. Petrov NMRC of Oncology between 2017 and 2022. Patients in the experimental group received personalized rehabilitation, while the control group underwent standard rehabilitation. The control group patients were paired based on key characteristics, including gender, age, functional status, histological subtype, disease stage, and treatment volume. The dynamics of patient parameters were evaluated in the pre-/post-operative period, immediately after implementing the rehabilitation programs, and one year later. The evaluation included an assessment of clinical status indicators (mMRC scale, COMP scale, VAS, 6-minute walk test), functional (PFTs) and psychophysiological parameters (MFI-20 scale, HADS scale), as well as quality of life indicators (EORTC-QLQ30).

Results. Analysis of rehabilitation effectiveness in NSCLC patients showed that the personalized rehabilitation model in the experimental group was effective in 86 % of cases, whereas standard rehabilitation programs in the control group were effective in 76 % of cases. The main determinants influencing the therapeutic effect following the application of rehabilitation programs tailored to the selected RTs are: the parameters of external respiration function (VC – vital capacity, PEFR – peak expiratory flow rate, MEF – mean expiratory flow rate), the 6-minute walk test, dyspnea severity scales (Modified Medical Research Council, mMRC), and activities of daily living (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COMP).

Conclusion. Identified determinants will allow for the early prediction of the effectiveness of rehabilitation technologies in specific models of resectable NSCLC patients, taking into account initial parameters.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-5-908-916
pdf (Русский)

References

Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2021 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена − филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России. 2022:252 [Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova AO. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2021 (morbidity and mortality). M.: P.A. Herzen MNIOI − branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution «NMIC of Radiology» of the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2022:252 (In Russ.)].

Мерабишвили В.М., Беляев А.М. Состояние онкологической помощи в России: однолетняя выживаемость больных злокачественными новообразованиями и летальность на первом году жизни по всем локализациям опухолей. Вопросы онкологии. 2023;69(1):55-66 [Merabishvili VM, Belyaev AM. The state of oncological care in Russia: one-year survival of patients with malignant neoplasms and mortality in the first year of life for all tumor localities. Voprosy Onkologii. 2023;69(1):55-66 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-1-55-66.

Юркова Ю.П., Мерабишвили В.М., Левченко Е.В. Эпидемиология и выживаемость больных раком легкого, влияние COVID-19 (клинико-популяционное исследование). Вопросы онкологии. 2022;68(5):576-588 [Yurkova YuP, Merabishvili VM, Levchenko EV. Epidemiology and survival of lung cancer patients, the impact of COVID-19 (clinical and population-based study). Voprosy Onkologii. 2022;68(5):576-588 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2022-68-5-576-588.

Shannon VR. Role of pulmonary rehabilitation in the management of patients with lung cancer. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2010;16(4):334-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32833a897d.

Kenny PM, King MT, Viney RC, et al. Quality of life and survival in the 2 years after surgery for non small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):233-41. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.07.7230.

Лактионов К.К., Артамонова Е.В., Борисова Т.Н., и др. Злокачественное новообразование бронхов и легкого. Современная онкология. 2022;24(3):269-304 [Laktionov KK, Artamonova EV, Borisova TN, et al. Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung: Russian clinical guidelines. J Mod Oncol. 2022;24(3):269-304 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2022.3.201848.

Zhang T, Guo Q, Zhang Y, et al. Meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone in T2aN0 stage IB non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(1):139-144. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_862_17

Li S, Zhou K, Che G, et al. Enhanced recovery programs in lung cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cancer Manag Res. 2017;9:657-670. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S150500.

Rogers LJ, Bleetman D, Messenger DE, et al. The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(4):1843-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.151.

Cavalheri V, Burtin C, Formico VR, et al. Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6(6):CD009955. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009955.pub3.

Клинические рекомендации. Злокачественное новообразование бронхов и легкого. Общероссийский национальный союз «Ассоциация онкологов России». Протокол от «18» января 2021 г. № 1/ЗП/2021 [Clinical recommendations. Malignant neoplasm of the bronchi and lung. All-Russian National Union "Association of Oncologists of Russia". Protocol No. 1/PO/2021 dated January 18, 2021. (In Russ.)].

Каспаров Б.С., Ковлен Д.В., Семиглазова Т.Ю., и др. Комплексный анализ эффективности персонализированных программ реабилитации больных раком молочной железы. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2023;100(2):31-38 [Kasparov BS, Kovlen DV, Semiglazova TYu, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the efficacy of personalized rehabilitation programs in patients with breast cancer. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2023;100(2):31-38 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort202310002131.

Каспаров Б.С., Ковлен Д.В., Семиглазова Т.Ю., и др. Исследование эффективности персонализированной реабилитации больных операбельным раком предстательной железы. Вопросы онкологии. 2023;69(3):422-428 [Kasparov BS, Kovlen DV, Semiglazova TYu, et al. Study of the effectiveness of personalized rehabilitation of patients with operable prostate cancer. Voprosy Onkologii. 2023;69(3):422-428 (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2023-69-3-422-428.

Mainini C, Rebelo PF, Bardelli R, et al Perioperative physical exercise interventions for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: what is the evidence? SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116673855. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312116673855.

Crandall K, Maguire R, Campbell A, et al. Exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review. Surg Oncol. 2018;23(1):17-30. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.suronc.2014.01.001.

Brocki BC, Andreasen J, Nielsen LR, et al. Short and long-term effects of supervised versus unsupervised exercise training on health-related quality of life and functional outcomes following lung cancer surgery - a randomized controlled trial. Lung Cancer. 2014;83(1):102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.10.015.

Edvardsen E, Skjonsberg OH, Borchsenius F, et al. Effect of training on maximal oxygen uptake and muscular strength after lung cancer surgery - a randomized controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2016;42(57):369. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205944.

Arbane G, Douiri A, Hart N, et al. Effect of postoperative physical training on activity after curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(2):100-107. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.physio.2013.12.002.

Sebio GR, Yáñez MI, Giménez ME, et al. Functional and postoperative outcomes after preoperative exercise training in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:486-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivw152.

Morano MT, Mesquita R, Da Silva GP, et al. Comparison of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation with chest physical therapy on the levels of fibrinogen and albumin in patients with lung cancer awaiting lung resection: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-121.

Gao K, Yu PM, Su JH, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing screening and pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation reduce postoperative complications and improve fast-track recovery after lung cancer surgery: a study for 342 cases. Thorac Cancer. 2015;6:443-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12199.

Bradley A, Marshall A, Stonehewer L, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation programme for patients undergoing curative lung cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 213;44:266-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt381.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2023