OPEN TECHNIQUE OF HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOPERFUSION IN TREATMENT OF PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS IN RATS WITH ASCITIC OVARIAN TUMOR
##article.numberofdownloads## 24
##article.numberofviews## 124
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

OVARIAN CANCER
HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOPERFUSION (HIPEC)
OPEN TECHNIQUE OF CHEMOPERFUSION
CLOSED TECHNIQUE OF CHEMOPERFUSION
CISPLATIN
MITOMYCIN C

How to Cite

Kireeva, G., Guseynov, K., Gafton, G., Semenov, A., Maydin, M., Stukov, A., Senchik, K., Belyaeva, O., Bespalov, V., & Belyaev, A. (2017). OPEN TECHNIQUE OF HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOPERFUSION IN TREATMENT OF PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS IN RATS WITH ASCITIC OVARIAN TUMOR. Voprosy Onkologii, 63(5), 792–798. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2017-63-5-792-798

Abstract

For the first time comparative study of open and closed techniques of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC) in terms of safety and efficacy was performed in a rat model of ascetic ovarian cancer transplanted intraperitoneally. Original device and implantation technique of the device into peritoneal cavity were developed and used in the study. All animals after tumor implantation were randomized into 4 groups: 1 - control, intraperitoneal administration of 0.5 ml of saline (n=19); 2 - closed HIPEC with cisplatin, 20 mg/ kg (n=15); 3 - open HIPEC with cisplatin, 16 mg/kg (n=16); 4 - open HIPEC with mitomycin C (n=10). In preliminary stage while working out the original open technique of HIPEC we established that it requires dose reduction for cisplatin from 20 to 16 mg/kg compared to closed technique of HIPEC. We didn't find significant difference between groups 1, 2 and 3 in terms of number of postoperative complications. According to the results of analysis of body weight changes in postoperative period open HIPEC was worse tolerated compared to close HIPEC. Median survival of rats in group 2 was 53 days which was significantly higher compared to median survival in group 2-25 days (p=0,044). Open HIPEC with mitomycin C turned out to be less effective than open HIPEC with cis-platin but equally effective compared to closed HIPEC with cisplatin. However this is preliminary result and more rats have to be included in group 4 in order to make confident conclusion. Overall open HIPEC with cisplatin in accordance with suggested technique seem to be more promising than closed HIPEC in terms of improving outcomes of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2017-63-5-792-798
##article.numberofdownloads## 24
##article.numberofviews## 124
PDF (Русский)

References

Беляева О.А. Беспалов В.Г., Киреева ГС. и др. Моделирование химиоперфузионного лечения канцероматоза брюшной полости // БЭБиМ. - 2015. - № 1. - С. 91-95.

Беляева О.А., Беспалов В.Г, Сенчик К.Ю. и др. Хими-оперфузионное лечение канцероматоза брюшной полости. - СПб: Т8 Издательские Технологии, 2016. - 145 с.

Интернет-ресурс: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Дата обращения: 10.09.2016.

Миронов А.Н., Бунятян Н.Д., Васильева А.Н. и др. Руководство по проведению доклинических исследований лекарственных средств. - М.: Гриф и К, 2012. - 944 с.

Bhatt A., Mittal S., Gopinath K.S. Safety considerations for Health care Workers involved in Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative chemotherapy // Indian J. Surg. Oncol. - 2016. - Vol. 7. - P. 249-257.

Elias D., Antoun S., Goharin A. et al. Research on the best chemohyperthermia technique of treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis after complete resection // Int. J. Surg. Investig. - 2000. - Vol. 1. - P. 431-439.

Facy O., Al Samman S., Magnin G. et al. High pressure enhances the effect of hyperthermia in intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin: an experimental study // Ann. Surg. - 2012. - Vol. 256. - P 1084-1088.

Glehen O., Cotte E., Kusamura S. et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: nomenclature and modalities of perfusion // J. Surg. Oncol. - 2008. - Vol. 98. - P. 242-246.

Glehen O., Kwiatkowski F, Sugarbaker P.H. et al. Cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a multiinstitutional study // J. Clin. Oncol. - 2004. - Vol.22. - P. 3284-3292.

Gonzalez-Moreno S., Gonzalez-Bayon L., Ortega-Perez G. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Methodology and safety considerations // Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. - 2012. - Vol. 21. - P 543-557.

Gouma E., Simos Y, Verginadis I. et al. A simple procedure for estimation of total body surface area and determination of a new value of Meeh's constant in rats // Lab. Anim. - 2012. - Vol. 46. - P 40-45.

Gremonprez F., Willaert W., Ceelen W. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: review of animal models // J. Surg. Oncol. - 2014. - Vol. 109. - P. 110-116.

Kyriazanos I., Kalles V., Stefanopoulos A. et al. Operating personnel safety during the administration of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) // Surg. Oncol. - 2016. - Vol. 25. - P 308-314.

Neuwirth M.G., Alexander H.R., Karakousis G.C. Then and now: cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), a historical perspective // J. Gastrointest. Оncol. - 2016. - Vol. 7. - P. 18-28.

Sugarbaker P.H., van der Speeten K. Surgical technology and pharmacology of hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy // J. Gastrointest. Oncol. - 2016. - Vol. 7. - P. 29-44.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2017