How to Cite
Abstract
Melanoma is on the first place in mortality among all skin tumors. Over the past 50 years, there has been a steady increase in the incidence of cutaneous melanoma compared to other types of tumors. Rates of 5-year survival are fairly high, if melanoma is diagnosed in the early stages, which requires adequate diagnostics and treatment. Melanoma diagnostic, especially in the early stages, can be problematic even for an experienced dermatologist. However, primary contact doctor can be any specialty. Melanoma and other skin tumors can be detected by physical examination during treatment for another disease. Phenotypic risks factors, anamnestic data, and physical examination data are important in cutaneous melanoma diagnostics. The sensitivity of clinical diagnosis during a visual examination by an experienced dermatologist is approximately 70 percent. However, dermascopy can significantly increase the accuracy of a clinical diagnostics. In recent years there has been an active research for new non-invasive methods and algorithms for cutaneous melanoma diagnostics. The main goal of non-invasive diagnostics is to determine need for biopsy. This decision should be based on a combination of clinical and dermascopic examinations and other information, including growth dynamics, symptoms and medical history. Thus, an adequate diagnostic of cutaneous melanoma, including non-invasive and invasive methods, is a simple and economically viable way to early detection of cutaneous melanoma and to reduce mortality from this aggressive disease.
References
National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Program Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2013 // Internet - Nov., 2015.
Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 11 // GLOBOCAN. - 2012. - V. 1.0.
Linos E., Swetter S.M., Cockburn M.G. et al. Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States // J. Investig. Dermatol. - 2009. - Vol. 129(7). - P 74.
Paek SC, Sober AJ, Tsao H, et al. Cutaneous melanoma // Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine. McGraw Hill Medical. - 2008. - Vol. I. - p.1134.
Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza M, et al. Meta-analisis of risk factors of cutaneous melanoma // Eur. J. Cancer -2005. - Vol. 41(14). - p.59.
Pampena R, Kyrgidis A, Lallas A et al. A meta-analysis of nevus-associated melanoma: Prevalence and practical implications // Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 2017. - Vol. 77. - P. 45.
Wehner M.R., Chren M.M., Nameth D. et al. International prevalence of indoor tanning: a systematic review and meta-analysis // JAMA Dermatol. - 2014. - Vol. 150(4). - P. 390-400.
Grob J.J., Gaudy-Marqueste C., Cha K.B. et al. Melanoma // Rook's Textbook of Dermatology. - 2016. - Ninth Edition.
Abbasi NR, Shaw HM, Rigel DS et al. Early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma: revisiting the ABCD criteria // JAMA Dermatol. - 2004. - Vol. 292(22). - P. 2771.
Grob JJ, Bonerandi JJ. The ‘ugly duckling' sign: identification of the common characteristics of nevi in an individual as a basis for melanoma screening // Arch Dermatol. - 1998. - Vol. 134(1). - P. 103.
Gachon J., Beaulieu P., Sei J.F. et al. First prospective study of the recognition process of melanoma in dermatological practice // Arch. Dermatol. - 2005. - Vol. 141. - P. 434-438.
Vestergaard M.E., Macaskill P., Holt P.E. et al. Dermos-copy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting // J. Dermatol. - 2008. -Vol. 159(3). - P. 669.
Argenziano G. et al. Algorithm for the determination of melanocytic versus non melanocytic lesions // Board of the Consensus Netmeeting. - 2003.
Гетьман А.Д. Дерматоскопия новообразований кожи // Учебное пособие. - Екатеринбург, 2015. - 158 с.
Nachbar F., Stolz W., Merkle T. et al. The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. High prospective value in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 1994. - Vol. 30 - p. 551.
Dolianitis C., Kelly J., Wolfe R., Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions // Arch Dermatol. - 2005. - Vol. 141(8). - P. 100.
Annessi G., Bono R., Sampogna F et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of three dermoscopic algorithmic methods in the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic lesions: the importance of light brown structureless areas in differentiating atypical melanocytic nevi from thin melanomas // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 2007. - Vol. 56(5). - P. 759.
Menzies S.W., Ingvar C., Crotty K.A., McCarthy W.H. Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features // Arch Dermatol. - 1996. - Vol. 132. - P. 1178.
Dolianitis C., Kelly J., Wolfe R., Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions // Arch Dermatol. - 2005. - Vol. 141(8). - P. 100.
Haenssle H.A., Korpas B., Hansen-Hagge C. et al. Seven-point checklist for dermatoscopy: performance during 10 years of prospective surveillance of patients at increased melanoma risk // Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 2010. - Vol. 62(5). - P. 785-793.
Argenziano G., Soyer H.P., Chimenti S. et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 2003. -Vol. 48. - P. 679.
Argenziano G., Fabbrocini G., Carli P. et al. Epilumines-cence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatos-copy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis // Arch Dermatol. - 1998. - Vol. 134(12). - P. 1563.
Henning J.S., Dusza S.W., Wang S.Q. et al. The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. -2007. - Vol. 56. - P. 45.
Henning JS, Stein JA, Yeung J et al. CASH algorithm for dermoscopy revisited // Arch Dermatol. - 2008 -Vol.144 (4). - p.554-555
Meyer L.E., Otberg N., Sterry W. et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy: comparison of the reflectance and fluorescence mode by imaging human skin // Journal of biomedical optics. - 2006. - Vol. 11.
Gerger A, Koller S, Kern T, et al. Diagnostic applicability of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in melanocytic skin tumors // The Journal of investigative dermatology. - 2005. - Vol. 124. - P. 493-498.
Moncrieff M., Cotton S., Claridge E. et al. Spectropho-tometric intracutaneous analysis: a new technique for imaging pigmented skin lesions // The British journal of dermatology. - 2002. - Vol. 146. - P. 448-457.
Малишевская Н.П., Соколова А.В. Современные методы неинвазивной диагностики меланомы кожи // Вестник дерматологии и венерологии. - 2014. - № 4. - C. 48-50.
Wachsman W., Morhenn V., Palmer T. et al. Noninvasive genomic detection of melanoma // The British journal of dermatology. - 2011. - Vol. 164. - P. 797-806.
Altamura D., Avramidis M., Menzies S.W. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma // Arch Dermatol. - 2008. - Vol. 144(4). - P. 502.
Liu W., Hill D., Gibbs A.F. et al. What features do patients notice that help to distinguish between benign pigmented lesions and melanomas? The ABCD(E) rule versus the seven-point checklist // Melanoma Res. - 2005. - Vol. 15(6). - P. 549.
Ng PC., Barzilai D.A., Ismail S.A. et al. Evaluating invasive cutaneous melanoma: is the initial biopsy representative of the final depth? // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. - 2003. -Vol. 48(3). - P. 420.
Fuller S.R., Bowen G.M., Tanner B. et al. Digital dermoscopic monitoring of atypical nevi in patients at risk for melanoma // Dermatol. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 33(10). - P. 1198.
Argenziano G., Mordente I., Ferrara G. et al. Dermoscopic monitoring of melanocytic skin lesions: clinical outcome and patient compliance vary according to follow-up protocols // Br. J. Dermatol. - 2008. - Vol. 159(2). - P. 331.
Menzies S.W., Gutenev A., Avramidis M. et al. Shortterm digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions // Arch Dermatol. - 2001. - Vol. 137(12). - P. 1583.
Marsden J.R., Newton-Bishop J.A., Burrows L. et al. Revised U.K. guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma // British Association of Dermatologists Clinical Standards Unit. Br. J. Dermatol. - 2010. - Vol. 163(2). - P 238.
Christenson L.J., Phillips PK., Weaver A.L., Otley C.C. Primary closure vs second-intention treatment of skin punch biopsy sites: a randomized trial // Arch. Dermatol. - 2005. - Vol. 141(9). - P. 1093.
NCCN Guidelines 2.2019.
Molenkamp B.G., Sluijter B.J., Oosterhof B., Meijer S., Van Leeuwen PA. [Low prognostic importance of non-radical melanoma excision and the presence of melanoma cells in the re-excision specimen to overall and disease-free survival of melanoma patients]. [Article in Dutch] // Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. - 2008. - Vol. 152(42). - P. 93.
Mohsin Rashid Mir, C Stanley Chan, Farhan Khan et al. The rate of melanoma transection with various biopsy techniques and the influence of tumor transection on patient survival // Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology - 2013. - Vol. 68 (3). - P. 452-458.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2019