EXPERIENCE OF ENDOPROSTHETICS OF PATIENTS WITH PELVIC TUMORS
##article.numberofdownloads## 56
##article.numberofviews## 119
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

PELVIC TUMORS
BONE CEMENT
ENDOPROSTHETICS

How to Cite

Gafton, G., Gudz, Y., Gafton, I., Zinovev, G., Semiglazov, V., & Petrov, V. (2017). EXPERIENCE OF ENDOPROSTHETICS OF PATIENTS WITH PELVIC TUMORS. Voprosy Onkologii, 63(2), 309–315. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2017-63-2-309-315

Abstract

This study presents an analysis of the effectiveness of organ-preserving surgeries using various endoprostheses in patients with malignant tumors of the pelvic bones. Nine patients (male - 3, female - 7) with malignant tumors of the pelvic bones (chondrosarcoma - 7, osteosarcoma - 1, me-tastases - 2) underwent organ-preserving surgeries with endo-prosthetics of the postresection defect. The average age of the patients was 38 years (15-67 years). During the operation two patients were equipped with individual prostheses of Waldemar Link, one patient - a combined prosthesis with an individual pelvic component (from Biomedical) and a modular femoral component. In 7 patients modular structures of Implant-Сast were used. The pelvic component was cementless, femoral -more often (7 cases) on a cement basis. Patients were assessed by oncological, surgical and functional results. Anatomically-functional status was assessed on the MSTS scale. As a conclusion good functional and oncological results can be obtained even with the resection of three segments of the pelvic bones if the ileal bone volume is sufficient for a good fixation of the endoprosthesis. To achieve the most durable fixation of the femoral component of the endoprosthesis it is better to use bone cement.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2017-63-2-309-315
##article.numberofdownloads## 56
##article.numberofviews## 119
PDF (Русский)

References

Алиев М.Д., Тепляков В.В., Мусаев Э.Р и др. Операции при опухолях опорно-двигательного аппарата, из Атласа онкологических операций / Под редакцией Чиссова В.И. - Москва, Геотар-Медиа, 2008. - С. 584585.

Гафтон Г.И., Гудзь Ю.В. Хирургическое лечение сарком таза. Отечественная школа онкологов // Ежеквартальный тематический журнал «Практическая онкология». - 2010. - Т. 11. - № 1. - С. 25-30.

Мусаев Э.Р. Современные подходы к хирургическому лечению больных опухолями костей таза. Автореферат диссертации на соискание степени доктора медицинских наук. - Москва, РОНЦ им. Н.Н.Блохина, 2008. - 42 с.

Enneking W.F., Dunham W.K. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the in nominate bone // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. - 1978. - Vol. 60. - P. 731-46.

Falkinstein Y1, Ahlmann E.R., Menendez L.R. Reconstruction of type II pelvic resection with a new peri-acetabular reconstruction endoprosthesis // J. Bone Joint. Surg. Br. - 2008. - Vol. 90. - P 371-376.

Gebert C1, Wessling M., Hoffmann C. et al. Hip transposition as a limb salvage procedure following the resection of periacetabular tumors // J. Surg. Oncol. -2011. - Vol. 103. - P. 269-275.

Ji T1, Guo W., Yang R.L. et al. Modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis reconstruction-experience in 100 patients with mid-term follow-up results // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2013. - Vol. 39. - P. 53-60.

Witte D1, Bernd L., Bruns J. et al. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvic endoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. - 2009. - Vol. 35. - P 1318-1325.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2017