COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS METHODS OF REGIONAL INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS
STOMACH CANCER
REGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY
AEROSOL CHEMOTHERAPY
PIPAC
HIPAC
HIPЕC

How to Cite

Zakharenko, A., Vovin, K., Kupenskaya, T., Rybalchenko, V., Natkha, A., Ten, O., Zaytsev, D., Trushin, A., Belyaev, M., & Bagnenko, S. (2018). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS METHODS OF REGIONAL INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY. Voprosy Onkologii, 64(2), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-2-266-271

Abstract

The main effective method of treatment for implantation metastases remains the regional treatment strategy. Systemic chemotherapy is ineffective. The standard treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis is cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemo-hyperthermal perfusion (HIPEC), which is performed in an open, closed or laparoscopic way. In recent years a new method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been developed: laparoscopic aerosol intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIPAC). An experimental study is made to compare the efficacy and safety of various methods of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-2-266-271
PDF (Русский)

References

Захаренко А.А., Натха А.С., Беляев М.А. и др. Экспериментальное обоснование максимально эффективного режима лапароскопической аэрозольной внутрибрюшинной химиотерапии (PIPAC) // Вопросы онкологии. - 2017. - Т. 63. -№ 3. - С. 490-496.

Захаренко А.А., Натха А.С., Трушин А.А. и др. Аэрозольная внутрибрюшинная химиотерапия - новый эффективный способ лечения канцероматоза брюшины // Medline. ru. - 2015. - Т. 16. - С. 834-849.

Facchiano E., Risio D., Kianmanesh R. et al. Laparoscopic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: indications, aims, and results: a systematic review of the literature // Ann Surg. Oncol. - 2012. - Vol. 19. - № 9. - P. 2946-2950.

Fagotti A., Gallotta V., Romano F. et al. Peritoneal carcinosis of ovarian origin // World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. - 2010. - Vol. 2. - № 2. - P 102-108.

Grass F., Vuagniaux A., Teixeira-Farinha H. et al. Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis // Br. J. Surg. - 2017. - Vol. 104. - № 6. - P. 669-678.

Isobe Y., Nashimoto A., Akazawa K. et al. Gastric Cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry // Gastric Cancer. - 2011. - Vol. 14. - № 4. - P 301-316.

Macri' A., Fortugno A., Saladino E. Rationale and techniques of cytoreductive surgery and peritoneal chemohyperthermia // World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. - 2011. - Vol. 3. -№ 12. - P 169-174.

P. Ortega-Deballon, O. Facy., S. Jambet et al. Which method to deliver hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin? An experimental comparison of open and closed techniques // Annals of Surgical Oncology. - 2010. - Vol. 17. - № 7. - 1957-1963.

Segelman J., Granath F., Holm T. et al. Incidence, prevalence and risk factors for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer // British Journal of Surgery. - 2012. - Vol. 99. - P 699-705.

Seitz G., Fuchs J., Knigsrainer I. et al. Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancies in children // Chir. - 2014. - Vol. 139. - № 6. - P. 607-612.

Van der Speeten K., Stuart O.A., Sugarbaker PH. Pharmacology of perioperative intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal surface malignancy // Surgical oncology clinics of North America. - 2012. - Vol. 21. - № 4. - P 577-597.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

© АННМО «Вопросы онкологии», Copyright (c) 2018